Literature DB >> 12168991

Technological medicine and the autonomy of man.

Bjørn Hofmann1.   

Abstract

Is technology value-free or is it value-laden? How does technology affect human autonomy? These questions, viewed within the context of medicine, are the focus of attention in this article. The central argument is that we need neither to subscribe to the value-neutrality dictum nor to the all-encompassing value-ladenness thesis to explain the pertinent position of technology in medicine. Technology is constitutive of and strongly implicated in difficult questions of value. This, however, does not mean that technology is identical to (or neutral to) these value-laden questions. Technology poses issues of value, but only some of these relate to technology qua technology. Hence, it makes a difference whether we discuss general questions of value posed by technology or whether we discuss the value-ladenness of technology. Admitting technological value-ladenness does not imply that we are subject to a technological imperative that reduces our autonomy, on the contrary, it explains how technology increases our responsibility. This is particularly prominent in medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12168991     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016070531526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  9 in total

Review 1.  The role of science in medicine.

Authors:  I Nordin
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1999-06

2.  Interpreting the notion that technology is value-neutral.

Authors:  P Sundström
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  1998

3.  Technology, medicine & health, Part 4. Technological cancer: its causes & treatment.

Authors:  S N Davidson
Journal:  Healthc Forum J       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr

4.  The imperative character of medical technology and the meaning of "anticipated decision regret".

Authors:  T Tymstra
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Overdosing on medical technology.

Authors:  D Hellerstein
Journal:  Technol Rev       Date:  1983 Aug-Sep

6.  Avoiding the unintended consequences of growth in medical care: how might more be worse?

Authors:  E S Fisher; H G Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The goals of medicine. Setting new priorities.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

8.  The technological invention of disease.

Authors:  B Hofmann
Journal:  Med Humanit       Date:  2001-06

9.  The sorcerer's broom. Medicine's rampant technology.

Authors:  E J Cassell
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Why not integrate ethics in HTA: identification and assessment of the reasons.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  GMS Health Technol Assess       Date:  2014-11-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.