Literature DB >> 23661109

Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.

Hiroya Takeuchi1, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Yuko Kitagawa.   

Abstract

Technical advancements and development of endoscopic equipment in thoracoscopic surgery have resulted in increase in the popularity of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). However, advantages with regard to short-term outcome and oncological feasibility of MIE have not been adequately established. To date, a number of single-institution studies and several meta-analyses have demonstrated acceptable short-term outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, and the outcomes are comparable to those of conventional open esophagectomy (OE). A study group recently reported the results of the first multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared MIE and OE. The incidence of pulmonary infection after surgery was markedly lower in the MIE group than in the OE group. Additional benefits of MIE included less operative blood loss, better postoperative patients' quality of life, and shorter hospital stay. However, the oncological benefit to patients undergoing MIE has not been scientifically proven because there have been no RCTs to verify the equivalency in long-term survival of patients undergoing MIE compared with that of patients undergoing OE. If future prospective studies indicate oncological benefits, MIE could truly become the standard care for patients with esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23661109     DOI: 10.1007/s11748-013-0258-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1863-6705


  45 in total

Review 1.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.

Authors:  Omar A Jarral; Sanjay Purkayastha; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; George B Hanna; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Validation study of radio-guided sentinel lymph node navigation in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroya Takeuchi; Hirofumi Fujii; Nobutoshi Ando; Soji Ozawa; Yoshiro Saikawa; Koichi Suda; Takashi Oyama; Makio Mukai; Tadaki Nakahara; Atsushi Kubo; Masaki Kitajima; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Ines Gockel; Arnold Radtke; Thomas J Musholt; Stephan Timm; Andreas Rink; Achilleas Tsiamis; Constantine Karaliotas; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yousuke Kinjo; Noriaki Kurita; Fumiaki Nakamura; Hiroshi Okabe; Eiji Tanaka; Yoshiki Kataoka; Atsushi Itami; Yoshiharu Sakai; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Abhishek Sundaram; Juan C Geronimo; Brittany L Willer; Masato Hoshino; Zachary Torgersen; Arpad Juhasz; Tommy H Lee; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  J D Luketich; P R Schauer; N A Christie; T L Weigel; S Raja; H C Fernando; R J Keenan; N T Nguyen
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  K Kawahara; T Maekawa; K Okabayashi; T Hideshima; T Shiraishi; Y Yoshinaga; T Shirakusa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection.

Authors:  Rajeev Parameswaran; Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Rakesh Krishnadas; Martin Cooper; Richard Berrisford; Shahjehan Wajed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  17 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgical techniques are safe in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric malignancies.

Authors:  Shannon N Acker; Jennifer L Bruny; Timothy P Garrington; David A Partrick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Two-lung ventilation in the prone position: is it the standard anesthetic management for thoracoscopic esophagectomy?

Authors:  Hiroya Takeuchi; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-04

Review 3.  Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: approaches and outcomes.

Authors:  Danica N Giugliano; Adam C Berger; Ernest L Rosato; Francesco Palazzo
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection in minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Miao Lin; Yaxing Shen; Hao Wang; Mingxiang Feng; Lijie Tan
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-10-20

Review 5.  Hybrid and total minimally invasive esophagectomy: how I do it.

Authors:  Luigi Bonavina; Emanuele Asti; Andrea Sironi; Daniele Bernardi; Alberto Aiolfi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Determination of the optimal surgical procedure by identifying risk factors for pneumonia after transthoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Masato Hayashi; Hiroya Takeuchi; Rieko Nakamura; Koichi Suda; Norihito Wada; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.230

7.  Changes in oncological outcomes: comparison of the conventional and minimally invasive esophagectomy, a single institution experience.

Authors:  Misbah Khan; Anam Muzaffar; Aamir Ali Syed; Shahid Khatak; Ali Raza Khan; Muhammad Ijaz Ashraf
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-09-15

8.  Mediastinal Adiposity Influences the Technical Difficulty of Thoracic Procedure in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Akihiko Okamura; Masayuki Watanabe; Takanori Kurogochi; Yu Imamura; Koujiro Nishida; Shinji Mine
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Akihiko Okamura; Masayuki Watanabe; Shinji Mine; Koujiro Nishida; Yu Imamura; Takanori Kurogochi; Yuko Kitagawa; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic gastric tube formation with pyloromyotomy for reconstruction in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jin Won Lee; Sook Whan Sung; Jae Kil Park; Cho Hyun Park; Kyo Young Song
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 1.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.