Literature DB >> 25159642

Minimally invasive surgical techniques are safe in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric malignancies.

Shannon N Acker1, Jennifer L Bruny, Timothy P Garrington, David A Partrick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have become an established part of the care of the adult oncology patient. As surgeons have become more experienced with these advances in technique, MIS has recently seen an expanding role in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric malignancies. We hypothesize that MIS techniques can be used to provide reliable diagnosis and safe therapeutic resection of many pediatric malignancies. PROCEDURE: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent a minimally invasive operation for diagnosis or treatment of a malignant solid tumor at the Children's Hospital Colorado over a ten-year period.
RESULTS: A total of 105 minimally invasive procedures were performed in 98 patients, 61% of which were male. The majority of cases, 78 (74%) were thoracoscopic procedures and the remaining 27 (26%) were laparoscopic procedures. Twenty-one (27%) thoracoscopic procedures were performed for complete resection of primary tumor or metastases, with only three cases (14%) converted to open thoracotomy. Tumors that were successfully removed thoracoscopically include neuroblastomas (n = 8), metastatic disease (n = 7), and a schwannoma. Of the 28 laparoscopic procedures, nine were performed for tumor resection with one case converted to open. Tumors that were successfully removed laparoscopically include 6 adrenal neuroblastomas and one pseudopapillary pancreatic tumor. There were no major surgical complications. No port site or surgical site recurrences were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: MIS techniques can be used safely and effectively for the diagnosis and resection of pediatric malignancies and treatment decisions can be made accurately based on tissue obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25159642     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3795-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  26 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection for cancer: a meta-analysis of results of randomized controlled trials on recurrence.

Authors:  Y Liang; G Li; P Chen; J Yu
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Video: laparoscopic Whipple procedure with a two-layered pancreatojejunostomy.

Authors:  Andrew A Gumbs; Brice Gayet; John P Hoffman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a single center experience of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  O Stănciulea; M Eftimie; L David; V Tomulescu; C Vasilescu; I Popescu
Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

4.  Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Ka Lau Leung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Steve C W Lam; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Simon S M Ng; Paul B S Lai; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Implementation and applications of robotic surgery within gynecologic oncology and gynecology; analysis of the first thousand cases.

Authors:  C Lönnerfors; J Persson
Journal:  Ceska Gynekol       Date:  2013-01

7.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic management of anterior mediastinal masses. Preliminary experience and results.

Authors:  A P Yim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Thoracoscopy in the management of anterior mediastinal masses.

Authors:  D J Sugarbaker
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  John A Howington; Matthew G Blum; Andrew C Chang; Alex A Balekian; Sudish C Murthy
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  4 in total

1.  Abdominal tumors in children: Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery.

Authors:  Chaeyoun Oh; Joong Kee Youn; Ji-Won Han; Hyun-Young Kim; Sung-Eun Jung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  Pediatric minimally invasive surgery for malignant abdominal tumor: Single center experience.

Authors:  Hee-Beom Yang; Hyun-Young Kim; Sung Eun Jung; Young Hun Choi; Ji Won Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Two-stage laparoscopic resection of giant hepatoblastoma in infants combined with liver partial partition and artery ligation.

Authors:  Yaohao Wu; Lexiang Zeng; Ronglin Qiu; Jie Zhang; Jianhang Su; Minyi Liao; Xiaogeng Deng
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Laparoscopic surgery for stage III neuroblastoma: A case report.

Authors:  Guizhen Huang; Guozhu Yang; Wenqian Huang; Mingxue Liu; Yi Su; Suolin Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.751

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.