Jin Won Lee1, Sook Whan Sung2, Jae Kil Park2, Cho Hyun Park1, Kyo Young Song1. 1. Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze the benefit and feasibility of this procedure compared with those of open method. METHODS: Abdominal procedure includes laparoscopic gastric mobilization, celiac axis lymph node dissection, formation of the gastric tube, and pyloromyotomy. The actual procedure performed during open surgery is the same as those of laparoscopic surgery except for the main incision. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was performed on 54 patients with esophageal cancer. The short-term outcomes, including postoperative complications were analyzed and compared with 44 cases of open method. RESULTS: Although the total operative time was not different between 2 groups (349.8 minutes vs. 374.8 minutes, P = 0.153), the operation time of abdominal procedure was shorter in laparoscopic group (90.6 minutes vs. 162.1 minutes, P < 0.001). Operation related complications and hospital stay were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The number of transfused patients was significantly smaller in laparoscopic group (11.1% vs. 27.9%, P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic gastric tubing with pyloromyotomy is a feasible and safe treatment option for patients with esophageal cancer.
PURPOSE: To analyze the benefit and feasibility of this procedure compared with those of open method. METHODS: Abdominal procedure includes laparoscopic gastric mobilization, celiac axis lymph node dissection, formation of the gastric tube, and pyloromyotomy. The actual procedure performed during open surgery is the same as those of laparoscopic surgery except for the main incision. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was performed on 54 patients with esophageal cancer. The short-term outcomes, including postoperative complications were analyzed and compared with 44 cases of open method. RESULTS: Although the total operative time was not different between 2 groups (349.8 minutes vs. 374.8 minutes, P = 0.153), the operation time of abdominal procedure was shorter in laparoscopic group (90.6 minutes vs. 162.1 minutes, P < 0.001). Operation related complications and hospital stay were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The number of transfused patients was significantly smaller in laparoscopic group (11.1% vs. 27.9%, P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic gastric tubing with pyloromyotomy is a feasible and safe treatment option for patients with esophageal cancer.
Authors: James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-01-28 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Hyung-Ho Kim; Sang-Uk Han; Min-Chan Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Wook Kim; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Seung Wan Ryu; Gyu Seok Cho; Chan Young Kim; Han-Kwang Yang; Do Joong Park; Kyo Young Song; Sang Il Lee; Seong Yeob Ryu; Joo Ho Lee Journal: J Korean Surg Soc Date: 2013-01-29