Literature DB >> 23661079

Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium in wheat with an L1-regularized sparse Markov network.

Gota Morota1, Daniel Gianola.   

Abstract

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) is defined as a stochastic dependence between alleles at two or more loci. Although understanding LD is important in the study of the genetics of many species, little attention has been paid on how a covariance structure between many loci distributed across the genome should be represented. Given that biological systems at the cellular level often involve gene networks, it is appealing to evaluate LD from a network perspective, i.e., as a set of associated loci involved in a complex system. We applied a Markov network (MN) to study LD using data on 1,279 markers derived from 599 wheat inbred lines. The MN attempts to account for association between two markers, conditionally on the remaining markers in the network model. In this study, the recovery of the structure of a LD network was done through two variants of pseudo-likelihoods subject to an L1 penalty on the MN parameters. It is shown that, while the L1-regularized Markov network preserves features of a Bayesian network (BN), the nodes in the resulting networks have fewer links. The resulting sparse network, encoding conditional independencies, provides a clearer picture of association than marginal LD metrics, and a sparse graph eases interpretation markedly, since it includes a smaller number of edges than a BN. Thus, an L1-regularized sparse Markov network seems appealing for representing conditional LD with high-dimensional genomic data, where variables, e.g., single nucleotide polymorphism markers, are expected to be sparsely connected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23661079     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-013-2112-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  23 in total

1.  Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using linkage disequilibria with closely linked marker loci.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.

Authors:  C R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Graphical modeling of the joint distribution of alleles at associated loci.

Authors:  Alun Thomas; Nicola J Camp
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Hugo Naya; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Andrés Legarra; Eduardo Manfredi; Kent Weigel; José Miguel Cotes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  An assessment of linkage disequilibrium in Holstein cattle using a Bayesian network.

Authors:  G Morota; B D Valente; G J M Rosa; K A Weigel; D Gianola
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

9.  Partial Correlation Estimation by Joint Sparse Regression Models.

Authors:  Jie Peng; Pei Wang; Nengfeng Zhou; Ji Zhu
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  On measures of association among genetic variables.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Eduardo Manfredi; Henner Simianer
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Genomic Bayesian Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Bayesian Network To Characterize a Wide Spectrum of Rice Phenotypes.

Authors:  Haipeng Yu; Malachy T Campbell; Qi Zhang; Harkamal Walia; Gota Morota
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.154

2.  MeSH-Informed Enrichment Analysis and MeSH-Guided Semantic Similarity Among Functional Terms and Gene Products in Chicken.

Authors:  Gota Morota; Timothy M Beissinger; Francisco Peñagaricano
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.154

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.