Literature DB >> 23148973

An assessment of linkage disequilibrium in Holstein cattle using a Bayesian network.

G Morota1, B D Valente, G J M Rosa, K A Weigel, D Gianola.   

Abstract

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) is defined as a non-random association of the distributions of alleles at different loci within a population. This association between loci is valuable in prediction of quantitative traits in animals and plants and in genome-wide association studies. A question that arises is whether standard metrics such as D' and r(2) reflect complex associations in a genetic system properly. It seems reasonable to take the view that loci associate and interact together as a system or network, as opposed to in a simple pairwise manner. We used a Bayesian network (BN) as a representation of choice for an LD network. A BN is a graphical depiction of a probability distribution and can represent sets of conditional independencies. Moreover, it provides a visual display of the joint distribution of the set of random variables in question. The usefulness of BN for linkage disequilibrium was explored and illustrated using genetic marker loci found to have the strongest effects on milk protein in Holstein cattle based on three strategies for ranking marker effect estimates: posterior means, standardized posterior means and additive genetic variance. Two different algorithms, Tabu search (a local score-based algorithm) and incremental association Markov blanket (a constraint-based algorithm), coupled with the chi-square test, were used for learning the structure of the BN and were compared with the reference r(2) metric represented as an LD heat map. The BN captured several genetic markers associated as clusters, implying that markers are inter-related in a complicated manner. Further, the BN detected conditionally dependent markers. The results confirm that LD relationships are of a multivariate nature and that r(2) gives an incomplete description and understanding of LD. Use of an LD Bayesian network enables inferring associations between loci in a systems framework and provides a more accurate picture of LD than that resulting from the use of pairwise metrics.
© 2012 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23148973     DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  7 in total

1.  Bayesian Networks Illustrate Genomic and Residual Trait Connections in Maize (Zea mays L.).

Authors:  Katrin Töpner; Guilherme J M Rosa; Daniel Gianola; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.154

2.  Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium in wheat with an L1-regularized sparse Markov network.

Authors:  Gota Morota; Daniel Gianola
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Multiple quantitative trait analysis using bayesian networks.

Authors:  Marco Scutari; Phil Howell; David J Balding; Ian Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Modelling and visualizing fine-scale linkage disequilibrium structure.

Authors:  David Edwards
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Genomic Bayesian Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Bayesian Network To Characterize a Wide Spectrum of Rice Phenotypes.

Authors:  Haipeng Yu; Malachy T Campbell; Qi Zhang; Harkamal Walia; Gota Morota
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Predicting complex traits using a diffusion kernel on genetic markers with an application to dairy cattle and wheat data.

Authors:  Gota Morota; Masanori Koyama; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel; Daniel Gianola
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Utilizing trait networks and structural equation models as tools to interpret multi-trait genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Mehdi Momen; Malachy T Campbell; Harkamal Walia; Gota Morota
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.993

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.