Literature DB >> 22197241

Children's development of self-regulation in speech production.

Ewen N MacDonald1, Elizabeth K Johnson, Jaime Forsythe, Paul Plante, Kevin G Munhall.   

Abstract

Species-specific vocalizations fall into two broad categories: those that emerge during maturation, independent of experience, and those that depend on early life interactions with conspecifics. Human language and the communication systems of a small number of other species, including songbirds, fall into this latter class of vocal learning. Self-monitoring has been assumed to play an important role in the vocal learning of speech and studies demonstrate that perception of your own voice is crucial for both the development and lifelong maintenance of vocalizations in humans and songbirds. Experimental modifications of auditory feedback can also change vocalizations in both humans and songbirds. However, with the exception of large manipulations of timing, no study to date has ever directly examined the use of auditory feedback in speech production under the age of 4. Here we use a real-time formant perturbation task to compare the response of toddlers, children, and adults to altered feedback. Children and adults reacted to this manipulation by changing their vowels in a direction opposite to the perturbation. Surprisingly, toddlers' speech didn't change in response to altered feedback, suggesting that long-held assumptions regarding the role of self-perception in articulatory development need to be reconsidered.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22197241      PMCID: PMC3267900          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  31 in total

1.  Vowel acoustic space development in children: a synthesis of acoustic and anatomic data.

Authors:  Houri K Vorperian; Ray D Kent
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.

Authors:  Virgilio M Villacorta; Joseph S Perkell; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback.

Authors:  T A Burnett; M B Freedland; C R Larson; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: evidence from real-time formant manipulation.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  11-month-olds' knowledge of how familiar words sound.

Authors:  Daniel Swingley
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2005-09

Review 6.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms.

Authors:  A J Doupe; P K Kuhl
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks.

Authors:  C L Stager; J F Werker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-07-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Control of vocal intensity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): differential reinforcement of vocal intensity and the Lombard effect.

Authors:  K Manabe; E I Sadr; R J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Infant vocalizations in response to speech: vocal imitation and developmental change.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; A N Meltzoff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  W T Fitch; J Giedd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  23 in total

1.  A trade-off between somatosensory and auditory related brain activity during object naming but not reading.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier; Thomas M H Hope; Susan Prejawa; 'Ōiwi Parker Jones; Melanie Vitkovitch; Cathy J Price
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Can perceptual training alter the effect of visual biofeedback in speech-motor learning?

Authors:  Adam Klaus; Daniel R Lametti; Douglas M Shiller; Tara McAllister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  What Acoustic Studies Tell Us About Vowels in Developing and Disordered Speech.

Authors:  Ray D Kent; Carrie Rountrey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Language dependent vowel representation in speech production.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Fabienne Samson; Lucie Ménard; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory-perceptual learning improves speech motor adaptation in children.

Authors:  Douglas M Shiller; Marie-Lyne Rochon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Dissociations among linguistic, cognitive, and auditory-motor neuroanatomical domains in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ai Leen Choo; Evamarie Burnham; Kristin Hicks; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  The impact of brief restriction to articulation on children's subsequent speech production.

Authors:  Amanda Seidl; Françoise Brosseau-Lapré; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory-motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Elizabeth A Wieland; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-03-02

9.  Increased Response to Altered Auditory Feedback in Dyslexia: A Weaker Sensorimotor Magnet Implied in the Phonological Deficit.

Authors:  Mark R van den Bunt; Margriet A Groen; Takayuki Ito; Ana A Francisco; Vincent L Gracco; Ken R Pugh; Ludo Verhoeven
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Sensorimotor adaptation of speech in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Fatemeh Mollaei; Douglas M Shiller; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 10.338

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.