Literature DB >> 23651933

Reported goals of instructors of responsible conduct of research for teaching of skills.

Dena K Plemmons1, Michael W Kalichman.   

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) training grant requirement to provide training in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) is now more than 20 years old. Implicit in the requirement is that this training will have an impact not only on what trainees know, but on what they know how to do. There is, however, a range of responses about what skills are seen to be necessary for the ethical practice of science. As part of a larger, earlier study examining RCR instructors' overall goals in teaching RCR, we asked 50 RCR instructors from 37 different institutions what their goals were for teaching skills in their RCR courses. The responses about what constituted necessary skills were wide ranging, from a focus on teaching the skill of ethical decision making to the perceived importance of ensuring that trainees understand the importance of the community in some research relationships. This diversity in responses about what skills should be taught in RCR courses is not especially surprising, given the variation in instructors, formats, instruction, goals, and outcome measures for RCR courses, but it does reinforce the necessity of giving more thought to what goals are to be achieved. This is true not only of skills to be learned, but of any other objectives one might have for research ethics teaching and learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23651933      PMCID: PMC3705638          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.2.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  9 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Sean T Powell; Matthew A Allison; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses.

Authors:  Michael W Kalichman; Dena K Plemmons
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Fostering a culture of responsible lab conduct.

Authors:  Ann M Peiffer; Paul J Laurienti; Christina E Hugenschmidt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Reported Goals For Knowledge to be Learned in Responsible Conduct of Research Courses.

Authors:  Dena K Plemmons; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Ethics instruction increases graduate students' responsible conduct of research knowledge but not moral reasoning.

Authors:  Karen B Schmaling; Arthur W Blume
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Xiaoqian Wang; Michael D Mumford; Ryan P Brown; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Dena K Plemmons; Suzanne A Brody; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training Effectiveness.

Authors:  Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly; Ryan P Brown; Stephen T Murphy; Jason H Hill; Alison L Antes; Ethan P Waples; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2008-10-01
  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Research Agenda: The Effects of Responsible-Conduct-of-Research Training on Attitudes.

Authors:  Michael W Kalichman; Dena K Plemmons
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Evolution of an innovative approach to the delivery of in-person training in the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Karen L Schmidt; Laurel Yasko; Michael Green; Jane Alexander; Christopher Ryan
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  A room with a view of integrity and professionalism: personal reflections on teaching responsible conduct of research in the neurosciences.

Authors:  Emily Bell
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Mentoring for Responsible Research: The Creation of a Curriculum for Faculty to Teach RCR in the Research Environment.

Authors:  Dena K Plemmons; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Making Professional Decisions in Research: Measurement and Key Predictors.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; John T Chibnall; Kari A Baldwin; Raymond C Tait; Jillon S Vander Wal; James M DuBois
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  A randomized trial of a lab-embedded discourse intervention to improve research ethics.

Authors:  Dena K Plemmons; Erica N Baranski; Kyle Harp; David D Lo; Courtney K Soderberg; Timothy M Errington; Brian A Nosek; Kevin M Esterling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Navigating ethical challenges in the development and translation of biomaterials research.

Authors:  Michael D Hunckler; Aaron D Levine
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.