Literature DB >> 24760542

A room with a view of integrity and professionalism: personal reflections on teaching responsible conduct of research in the neurosciences.

Emily Bell1.   

Abstract

Neuroscientists are increasingly put into situations which demand critical reflection about the ethical and appropriate use of research tools and scientific knowledge. Students or trainees also have to know how to navigate the ethical domains of this context. At a time when neuroscience is expected to advance policy and practice outcomes, in the face of academic pressures and complex environments, the importance of scientific integrity comes into focus and with it the need for training at the graduate level in the responsible conduct of research (RCR). I describe my experience teaching RCR in a graduate neuroscience program and identify three personal reflections where further dialogue could be warranted: (1) mobilizing a common set of competencies and virtues standing for professionalism in the neurosciences; (2) tailoring RCR for the neurosciences and empowering students through the active engagement of mentors; (3) soliciting shared responsibility for RCR training between disciplines, institutions and governmental or funding agencies.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24760542     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9545-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  15 in total

1.  A brief history of RCR education.

Authors:  Michael Kalichman
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Neuroethical responsibilities.

Authors:  Eric Racine; Judy Illes
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  A code of ethics for the life sciences.

Authors:  Nancy L Jones
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Promoting responsible conduct of research: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Susan V Zimmerman; Karen Wallace
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Reported goals of instructors of responsible conduct of research for teaching of skills.

Authors:  Dena K Plemmons; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Teaching ethical aptitude to graduate student researchers.

Authors:  Laura S Weyrich; Eric T Harvill
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Teaching and Assessing the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Consensus Panel Report.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Jeffrey M Dueker
Journal:  J Res Adm       Date:  2009

8.  Developing a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum for professionalism and scientific integrity training for biomedical graduate students.

Authors:  Nancy L Jones; Ann M Peiffer; Ann Lambros; Martin Guthold; A Daniel Johnson; Michael Tytell; April E Ronca; J Charles Eldridge
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 9.  Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research.

Authors:  Judy Illes; Mary Anne Moser; Jennifer B McCormick; Eric Racine; Sandra Blakeslee; Arthur Caplan; Erika Check Hayden; Jay Ingram; Tiffany Lohwater; Peter McKnight; Christie Nicholson; Anthony Phillips; Kevin D Sauvé; Elaine Snell; Samuel Weiss
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 10.  Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Valley of death: A proposal to build a "translational bridge" for the next generation.

Authors:  Nao J Gamo; Michelle R Birknow; Danielle Sullivan; Mari A Kondo; Yasue Horiuchi; Takeshi Sakurai; Barbara S Slusher; Akira Sawa
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 3.304

2.  Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Daniel Pizzolato; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.