Literature DB >> 17717736

Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study.

Sean T Powell1, Matthew A Allison, Michael W Kalichman.   

Abstract

Training in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) is required for many research trainees nationwide, but little is known about its effectiveness. For a preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of a short-term course in RCR, medical students participating in an NIH-funded summer research program at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) were surveyed using an instrument developed through focus group discussions. In the summer of 2003, surveys were administered before and after a short-term RCR course, as well as to alumni of the courses given in the summers of 2002 and 2001. Survey responses were analyzed in the areas of knowledge, ethical decision-making skills, attitudes about responsible conduct of research, and frequency of discussions about RCR outside of class. The only statistically significant improvement associated with the course was an increase in knowledge, while there was a non-significant tendency toward improvements in ethical decision-making skills and attitudes about the importance of RCR training. The nominal impact of a short-term training course should not be surprising, but it does raise the possibility that other options for delivering information only, such as an Internet-based tutorial, might be considered as comparable alternatives when longer courses are not possible.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17717736     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-007-9012-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  6 in total

1.  Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: a survey of graduate students in experimental sciences.

Authors:  Sarah Brown; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Ethical issues in biomedical research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey.

Authors:  Susan Eastwood; Pamela Derish; Evangeline Leash; Stephen Ordway
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics.

Authors:  M W Kalichman; P J Friedman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research.

Authors:  Raymond de Vries; Melissa S Anderson; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses.

Authors:  Michael W Kalichman; Dena K Plemmons
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Dena K Plemmons; Suzanne A Brody; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.525

  6 in total
  28 in total

1.  The effectiveness of ethics education: a quasi-experimental field study.

Authors:  Douglas R May; Matthew T Luth
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  A retrospective analysis of the trend of retracted publications in the field of biomedical and life sciences.

Authors:  Jong Yong Abdiel Foo
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Using Insights from Applied Moral Psychology to Promote Ethical Behavior Among Engineering Students and Professional Engineers.

Authors:  Scott D Gelfand
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  The development and assessment of an NIH-funded research ethics training program.

Authors:  James M DuBois; Jeffrey M Dueker; Emily E Anderson; Jean Campbell
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Reported goals of instructors of responsible conduct of research for teaching of skills.

Authors:  Dena K Plemmons; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences.

Authors:  Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2016-05-27

7.  Connecting Past with Present: A Mixed-Methods Science Ethics Course and its Evaluation.

Authors:  Ioanna Semendeferi; Panagiotis Tsiamyrtzis; Malcolm Dcosta; Ioannis Pavlidis
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Research Agenda: The Effects of Responsible-Conduct-of-Research Training on Attitudes.

Authors:  Michael W Kalichman; Dena K Plemmons
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 9.  Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.

Authors:  Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Stephen T Murphy; Ethan P Waples; Michael D Mumford; Ryan P Brown; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2009-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.