Literature DB >> 23640002

On pelvic reference lines and the MR evaluation of genital prolapse: a proposal for standardization using the Pelvic Inclination Correction System.

C Betschart1, L Chen, J A Ashton-Miller, J O L Delancey.   

Abstract

Five midsagittal pelvic reference lines have been employed to quantify prolapse using MRI. However, the lack of standardization makes study results difficult to compare. Using MRI scans from 149 women, we demonstrate how use of existing reference lines can systematically affect measurements in three distinct ways: in oblique line systems, distances measured to the reference line vary with antero-posterior location; soft issue-based reference lines can underestimate organ movement relative to the pelvic bones; and systems defined relative to the MR scanner are affected by intra- and interindividual differences in the pelvic inclination angle at rest and strain. Thus, we propose a standardized approach called the Pelvic Inclination Correction System (PICS). Based on bony structures and the body axis, the PICS system corrects for variation in pelvic inclination, at rest of straining, and allows for the standardized measurement of organ displacement in the direction of prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23640002      PMCID: PMC3986860          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2100-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of pelvic organ descent by use of functional cine-MRI: which reference line should be used?

Authors:  Andreas Lienemann; Dorothée Sprenger; Udo Janssen; Eva Grosch; Christoph Pellengahr; Christoph Anthuber
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for grading pelvic organ prolapse according to the International Continence Society classification: which line should be used?

Authors:  Arnaud Fauconnier; Elise Zareski; Joseph Abichedid; Georges Bader; Bruno Falissard; Xavier Fritel
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  The SCIPP line--an aid in interpreting the voiding lateral cystourethrogram.

Authors:  L E Noll; J A Hutch
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent.

Authors:  A Lienemann; C Anthuber; A Baron; P Kohz; M Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data.

Authors:  G Wu; P R Cavanagh
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support.

Authors:  Aimee Summers; Lisa A Winkel; Hero K Hussain; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display.

Authors:  A Yang; J L Mostwin; N B Rosenshein; E A Zerhouni
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; Sohrab Gollogly; Eric Berthonnaud; Johanes Dimnet
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor relaxation: dynamic analysis and evaluation of patients before and after surgical repair.

Authors:  M A Goodrich; M J Webb; B F King; A E Bampton; N G Campeau; S J Riederer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  28 in total

1.  Standardization of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging measurements of pelvic organ prolapse: can the PICS line help?

Authors:  Diaa E E Rizk; Ralf Tunn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Traction force needed to reproduce physiologically observed uterine movement: technique development, feasibility assessment, and preliminary findings.

Authors:  Carolyn W Swenson; Jiajia Luo; Luyun Chen; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  A new method for the evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse in women using a three-dimensional optic scanner.

Authors:  George R Kasyan; Nataliya V Tupikina; Dmitry Yu Pushkar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Technique development and measurement of cross-sectional area of the pubovisceral muscle on MRI scans of living women.

Authors:  Mariana Masteling; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Quantitative assessment of new MRI-based measurements to differentiate low and high stages of pelvic organ prolapse using support vector machines.

Authors:  S Onal; S Lai-Yuen; P Bao; A Weitzenfeld; D Hogue; S Hart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The 3D Pelvic Inclination Correction System (PICS): A universally applicable coordinate system for isovolumetric imaging measurements, tested in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Authors:  Caecilia S Reiner; Tom Williamson; Thomas Winklehner; Sean Lisse; Daniel Fink; John O L DeLancey; Cornelia Betschart
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Positional pelvic organ prolapse (POP) evaluation using open, weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Authors:  Boris Friedman; Lynn Stothers; Darren Lazare; Andrew Macnab
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Assessment of a semiautomated pelvic floor measurement model for evaluating pelvic organ prolapse on MRI.

Authors:  S Onal; S Lai-Yuen; P Bao; A Weitzenfeld; K Greene; R Kedar; S Hart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  The length of anterior vaginal wall exposed to external pressure on maximal straining MRI: relationship to urogenital hiatus diameter, and apical and bladder location.

Authors:  Aisha Yousuf; Luyun Chen; Kindra Larson; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Quantitative analyses of variability in normal vaginal shape and dimension on MR images.

Authors:  Jiajia Luo; Cornelia Betschart; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.