Literature DB >> 16579933

The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support.

Aimee Summers1, Lisa A Winkel, Hero K Hussain, John O L DeLancey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the degree of anterior compartment (bladder) and apical compartment (cervix) prolapse are correlated, and whether 2 anterior compartment elements (urethra and bladder) are related at maximal Valsalva. STUDY
DESIGN: Women with a complete spectrum of pelvic support were recruited for a pelvic support study. Dynamic magnetic resonance scans were taken during Valsalva. A convenience sample of 153 women with a mean age of 53.3 +/- 12.5 (SD) years with a uterus in situ was studied. Anterior compartment status was assessed by the most caudal bladder point and the internal urinary meatus. The external cervical os was used to assess the apical compartment. The position of the bladder, urethra, and uterus were determined in 20 nulliparous women to determine their reference locations. The distances of each structure below the reference positions were calculated at maximum Valsalva.
RESULTS: Average distances of the bladder base, urethra, and uterus from the reference positions at maximal Valsalva were 4.1 +/- 2.4 cm, 3.1 +/- 1.3 cm, and 4.3 +/- 2.4 cm, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient of the relationship between the bladder base and uterine distances was r = 0.73 (r2 = 0.53). The Pearson correlation coefficient of the bladder distance and urethral distance was r = 0.82 (r2 = 0.67).
CONCLUSION: Half of the observed variation in anterior compartment support may be explained by apical support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16579933      PMCID: PMC1475726          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997.

Authors:  Sarah Hamilton Boyles; Anne M Weber; Leslie Meyn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Clinical evaluation of anterior vaginal wall support defects: interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability.

Authors:  James L Whiteside; Matthew D Barber; Marie F Paraiso; Cathy M Hugney; Mark D Walters
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy.

Authors:  J O DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of defects in DeLancey's vaginal support levels I, II, and III.

Authors:  H T Huddleston; D R Dunnihoo; P M Huddleston; P C Meyers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging.

Authors:  D Vanbeckevoort; L Van Hoe; R Oyen; E Ponette; D De Ridder; J Deprest
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit.

Authors:  Katharina M Bertschinger; Frank H Hetzer; Justus E Roos; Karl Treiber; Borut Marincek; Paul R Hilfiker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Sonographic diagnosis of paravaginal defects: a standardization of technique.

Authors:  J K Nguyen; C D Hall; E Taber; N N Bhatia
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2000-12

8.  Ultrasonography as a screening tool for paravaginal defects in women with stress incontinence: a pilot study.

Authors:  A Ostrzenski; N G Osborne
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

9.  Paravaginal defects: prevalence and accuracy of preoperative detection.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Segal; Brett J Vassallo; Steven D Kleeman; William A Silva; Mickey M Karram
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-07-01

10.  Fascial and muscular abnormalities in women with urethral hypermobility and anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

Authors:  John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  83 in total

1.  Structural position of the posterior vagina and pelvic floor in women with and without posterior vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Aisha Yousuf; Kindra A Larson; Dee E Fenner; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: more FDA concerns--positive reactions are possible.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Peter K Sand; Steven E Swift; Christopher Maher; Paul A Moran; Robert M Freeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Surgery for cystocele III: do all cystoceles involve apical descent? : Observations on cause and effect.

Authors:  John O L Delancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Evaluating the porcine dermis graft InteXen in three-compartment transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Rajeev Ramanah; Julian Mairot; Marie-Caroline Clement; Bernard Parratte; Robert Maillet; Didier Riethmuller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Laparoscopic sacral colpoperineopexy: abdominal versus abdominal-vaginal posterior graft attachment.

Authors:  Colleen D McDermott; Jean Park; Colin L Terry; Patrick J Woodman; Douglass S Hale
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Posterior vaginal compartment repairs: Where are the main anatomical defects?

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Sushen Naidoo; Stephen J Kerr; Chin H Yong; Warwick Birrell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Concomitant apical suspensory procedures in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse in the United States in 2011.

Authors:  Gina M Northington; Catherine O Hudson; Deborah R Karp; Sarah A Huber
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Introducing a true minimally invasive meshless and dissectionless anchoring system for pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Masha Tsivian; Adi Y Weintraub; Menahem Neuman; Alex Tsivian
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  3D analysis of cystoceles using magnetic resonance imaging assessing midline, paravaginal, and apical defects.

Authors:  Kindra A Larson; Jiajia Luo; Kenneth E Guire; Luyun Chen; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Anterior vaginal wall length and degree of anterior compartment prolapse seen on dynamic MRI.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Luyun Chen; Aimee Summers; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey; James O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.