Literature DB >> 8233259

Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor relaxation: dynamic analysis and evaluation of patients before and after surgical repair.

M A Goodrich1, M J Webb, B F King, A E Bampton, N G Campeau, S J Riederer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate structures involved in pelvic support using conventional and snapshot magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: We used conventional spin-echo MRI and dynamic snapshot GRASS MRI at various levels of the Valsalva maneuver to describe and quantitate the anatomy of pelvic floor relaxation and to assess anatomical changes produced by surgical repair. Ten female volunteers were evaluated to define normal anatomy and reference measurements. Five women with pelvic floor relaxation were evaluated before and after surgical repair.
RESULTS: Static and dynamic MRI were more sensitive than clinical pelvic examination in assessing and grading pelvic floor relaxation. Quantitative results showed widening of the levator hiatus and more vertical lie of the levator plate postoperatively. Descent of the pelvic organs on maximal straining postoperatively was the same as that in normal volunteers. The posterior urethrovesical angle on MRI was more than 110 degrees in 14 of 15 continent subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging may be valuable in analyzing and assessing pelvic floor relaxation and in understanding anatomical changes occurring before and after surgical repair. The increased sensitivity of MRI in grading prolapse may make it useful in evaluating women with symptoms of pelvic floor relaxation but who have negative findings on clinical examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8233259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  15 in total

1.  Levator plate angle in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared to women with normal support using dynamic MR imaging.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Aimee Summers; Hero K Hussain; Kenneth E Guire; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks.

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz; Mark E Vierhout; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-07

3.  Do the anatomical defects associated with cystocele affect the outcome of the anterior repair? A clinical and radiological study.

Authors:  Olugbenga A Adekanmi; Robert M Freeman; Simon A Jackson; Mark Puckett; Luigi Bombieri; Malcolm R Waterfield
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-11

Review 4.  How to develop and sustain a successful pelvic floor MRI practice.

Authors:  Ari Steiner; Robert Marks; Simin Bahrami; Hina Arif-Tiwari
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-04

5.  Computer aided three-dimensional reconstruction and modeling of the pelvis, by using plastinated cross sections, as a powerful tool for morphological investigations.

Authors:  Mircea-Constantin Sora; Radu Jilavu; Petru Matusz
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Dynamic magnetic resonance defecography in 10 asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Andreas G Schreyer; Christian Paetzel; Alois Fürst; Lena M Dendl; Elisabeth Hutzel; René Müller-Wille; Philipp Wiggermann; Stephan Schleder; Christian Stroszczynski; Patrick Hoffstetter
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Imaging in urogynaecology.

Authors:  Alexandros Derpapas; Giuseppe Alessandro Digesu; Ruwan Fernando; Vik Khullar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance defecography versus clinical examination and fluoroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Ramage; C Simillis; C Yen; C Lutterodt; S Qiu; E Tan; C Kontovounisios; P Tekkis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Pelvic floor changes in the first term pregnancy and postpartum period.

Authors:  Emily Wu; Thomas J Kuehl; Jilene M Gendron; Wendy White; Paul M Yandell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Novel rat model of stress urinary incontinence with a retroflexed bladder.

Authors:  Naoki Kawamorita; Yasuhiro Kaiho; Haruo Nakagawa; Minoru Miyazato; Mabumi Matsushita; Yoichi Arai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.