Literature DB >> 23631897

Partial removal of pore and loosely bound water by low-energy drying decreases cortical bone toughness in young and old donors.

Jeffry S Nyman1, Lacey E Gorochow, R Adam Horch, Sasidhar Uppuganti, Ahbid Zein-Sabatto, Mary Katherine Manhard, Mark D Does.   

Abstract

With an ability to quantify matrix-bound and pore water in bone, (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxometry can potentially be implemented in clinical imaging to assess the fracture resistance of bone in a way that is independent of current X-ray techniques, which assess bone mineral density as a correlate of bone strength. Working towards that goal, we quantified the effect of partial dehydration in air on the mechanical and NMR properties of human cortical bone in order to understand whether NMR is sensitive to water-bone interactions at low energy and whether such interactions contribute to the age-related difference in the toughness of bone. Cadaveric femurs were collected from male and female donors falling into two age groups: 21-60 years of age (young) and 74-99 years of age (old). After extracting two samples from the medial cortex of the mid-shaft, tensile tests were conducted on Wet specimens and paired, Partially Dry (PtlD) specimens (prepared by low-energy drying in air to remove ∼3% of original mass before testing). Prior analysis by micro-computed tomography found that there were no differences in intra-cortical porosity between the Wet and PtlD specimens nor did an age-related difference in porosity exist. PtlD specimens from young and old donors had significantly less toughness than Wet specimens, primarily due to a dehydration-related decrease in post-yield strain. The low-energy drying protocol did not affect the modulus and yield strength of bone. Subsequent dehydration of the PtlD specimens in a vacuum oven at 62°C and then 103°C, with quantification of water loss at each temperature, revealed an age-related shift from more loosely bound water to more tightly bound water. NMR detected a change in both bound and pore water pools with low-energy air-drying, and both pools were effectively removed when bone was oven-dried at 62°C, irrespective of donor age. Although not strictly significant due to variability in the drying and testing conditions, the absolute difference in toughness between Wet and PtlD tended to be greater for the younger donors that had higher bone toughness and more bound water for the wet condition than did the older donors. With sensitivity to low-energy bone-water interactions, NMR, which underpins magnetic resonance imaging, has potential to assess fracture resistance of bone as it relates to bone toughness. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23631897      PMCID: PMC3655090          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  46 in total

1.  Effect of collagen crosslinking on collagen-water interactions (a DSC investigation).

Authors:  J Kopp; M Bonnet; J P Renou
Journal:  Matrix       Date:  1989

2.  Physiocochemical structure of bone.

Authors:  R A Robinson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The influence of water removal on the strength and toughness of cortical bone.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Anuradha Roy; Xinmei Shen; Rae L Acuna; Jerrod H Tyler; Xiaodu Wang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Hydration structure of a collagen peptide.

Authors:  J Bella; B Brodsky; H M Berman
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure.

Authors:  R W McCalden; J A McGeough; M B Barker; C M Court-Brown
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Clinically compatible MRI strategies for discriminating bound and pore water in cortical bone.

Authors:  R Adam Horch; Daniel F Gochberg; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Factors affecting the determination of the physical properties of femoral cortical bone.

Authors:  E D Sedlin; C Hirsch
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1966

8.  Weakly and strongly associated nonfreezable water bound in bones.

Authors:  V V Turov; V M Gun'ko; V I Zarko; R Leboda; M Jablonski; M Gorzelak; E Jagiello-Wojtowicz
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.268

9.  Fracture toughness and work of fracture of hydrated, dehydrated, and ashed bovine bone.

Authors:  Jiahau Yan; Amit Daga; Rajendra Kumar; John J Mecholsky
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Age-related changes in the collagen network and toughness of bone.

Authors:  X Wang; X Shen; X Li; C Mauli Agrawal
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  25 in total

1.  The use of nano-computed tomography to enhance musculoskeletal research.

Authors:  Basma M Khoury; Erin M R Bigelow; Lauren M Smith; Stephen H Schlecht; Erica L Scheller; Nelly Andarawis-Puri; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.417

2.  Interfibril hydrogen bonding improves the strain-rate response of natural armour.

Authors:  D Arola; S Ghods; C Son; S Murcia; E A Ossa
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Identifying Novel Clinical Surrogates to Assess Human Bone Fracture Toughness.

Authors:  Mathilde Granke; Alexander J Makowski; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mark D Does; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Non-destructive NIR spectral imaging assessment of bone water: Comparison to MRI measurements.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Mugdha V Padalkar; Hee Jin Yang; Mikayel Ispiryan; Nancy Pleshko
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Bone mineral (31)P and matrix-bound water densities measured by solid-state (31)P and (1)H MRI.

Authors:  Alan C Seifert; Cheng Li; Chamith S Rajapakse; Mahdieh Bashoor-Zadeh; Yusuf A Bhagat; Alexander C Wright; Babette S Zemel; Antonios Zavaliangos; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 6.  The Role of Water Compartments in the Material Properties of Cortical Bone.

Authors:  Mathilde Granke; Mark D Does; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Near infrared spectroscopic assessment of loosely and tightly bound cortical bone water.

Authors:  Ramyasri Ailavajhala; William Querido; Chamith S Rajapakse; Nancy Pleshko
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.616

8.  Raman spectral classification of mineral- and collagen-bound water's associations to elastic and post-yield mechanical properties of cortical bone.

Authors:  Mustafa Unal; Ozan Akkus
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  MRI-derived bound and pore water concentrations as predictors of fracture resistance.

Authors:  Mary Kate Manhard; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Daniel F Gochberg; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Coupling Effect of Water and Proteoglycans on the In Situ Toughness of Bone.

Authors:  Xiaodu Wang; Haoran Xu; Yehong Huang; Sumin Gu; Jean X Jiang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.