Literature DB >> 25646568

The use of nano-computed tomography to enhance musculoskeletal research.

Basma M Khoury1, Erin M R Bigelow, Lauren M Smith, Stephen H Schlecht, Erica L Scheller, Nelly Andarawis-Puri, Karl J Jepsen.   

Abstract

Advances in computed tomography (CT) imaging are opening new avenues toward more precise characterization and quantification of connective tissue microarchitecture. In the last two decades, micro-computed tomography (microCT) has significantly augmented destructive methods for the 3D micro-analysis of tissue structure, primarily in the bone research field. Recently, microCT has been employed in combination with contrast agents to generate contrast-enhanced images of soft tissues that are otherwise difficult to visualize due to their native radiodensity. More recent advances in CT technology have enabled ultra-high resolution imaging by utilizing a more powerful nano-focused X-ray source, such as that found in nano-computed tomography (nanoCT) systems. NanoCT imaging has facilitated the expansion of musculoskeletal research by reducing acquisition time and significantly expanding the range of samples that can be imaged in terms of size, age and tissue-type (bone, muscle, tendon, cartilage, vessels and adipose tissue). We present the application and early results of nanoCT imaging in various tissue types and how this ultra-high resolution imaging modality is capable of characterizing microstructures at levels of details previously not possible. Contrast-enhanced imaging techniques to enable soft-tissue visualization and characterization are also outlined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone; cellular imaging; connective tissue imaging; contrast enhanced-CT; microCT; nano-computed tomography; vascular imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25646568      PMCID: PMC4755519          DOI: 10.3109/03008207.2015.1005211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Connect Tissue Res        ISSN: 0300-8207            Impact factor:   3.417


  84 in total

1.  The vascular architecture of tubular bone in the rat.

Authors:  M BROOKES
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1958-09

2.  Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure.

Authors:  J L Kuhn; S A Goldstein; L A Feldkamp; R W Goulet; G Jesion
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Imaging of cellular spread on a three-dimensional scaffold by means of a novel cell-labeling technique for high-resolution computed tomography.

Authors:  Benjamin W Thimm; Sandra Hofmann; Philipp Schneider; Roberto Carretta; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.056

4.  Three-dimensional characterization of in vivo intervertebral disc degeneration using EPIC-μCT.

Authors:  T Maerz; M D Newton; K Kristof; O Motovylyak; J S Fischgrund; D K Park; K C Baker
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Three-Dimensional X-ray Microtomography.

Authors:  B P Flannery; H W Deckman; W G Roberge; K L D'Amico
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Quantifying size and number of adipocytes in adipose tissue.

Authors:  Sebastian D Parlee; Stephen I Lentz; Hiroyuki Mori; Ormond A MacDougald
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Three-dimensional imaging of the mouse heart and vasculature using micro-CT and whole-body perfusion of iodine or phosphotungstic acid.

Authors:  P Joy Dunmore-Buyze; Elsbeth Tate; Fu-li Xiang; Sarah A Detombe; Zengxuan Nong; J Geoffrey Pickering; Maria Drangova
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Morphological and mechanical properties of caudal vertebrae in the SAMP6 mouse model of senile osteoporosis.

Authors:  Matthew J Silva; Michael D Brodt; Brian A Uthgenannt
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Effect of contrast agent charge on visualization of articular cartilage using computed tomography: exploiting electrostatic interactions for improved sensitivity.

Authors:  Neel S Joshi; Prashant N Bansal; Rachel C Stewart; Brian D Snyder; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Ultrastructural properties in cortical bone vary greatly in two inbred strains of mice as assessed by synchrotron light based micro- and nano-CT.

Authors:  Philipp Schneider; Martin Stauber; Romain Voide; Marco Stampanoni; Leah Rae Donahue; Ralph Müller
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Investigating Osteocytic Perilacunar/Canalicular Remodeling.

Authors:  Cristal S Yee; Charles A Schurman; Carter R White; Tamara Alliston
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Microvasculature of the Plantar Plate Using Nano-Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Fred T Finney; Aaron McPheters; Natalie V Singer; Jaron C Scott; Karl J Jepsen; James R Holmes; Paul G Talusan
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  The development of inter-strain variation in cortical and trabecular traits during growth of the mouse lumbar vertebral body.

Authors:  M A Ramcharan; M E Faillace; Z Guengerich; V A Williams; K J Jepsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Micro-CT and nano-CT analysis of filling quality of three different endodontic sealers.

Authors:  Yan Huang; Berkan Celikten; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Laura Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo; Nicholas Lippiatt; Arda Buyuksungur; Reinhilde Jacobs; Kaan Orhan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Compound deletion of thrombospondin-1 and -2 results in a skeletal phenotype not predicted by the single gene knockouts.

Authors:  Andrea I Alford; Chris Stephan; Kenneth M Kozloff; Kurt D Hankenson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Reporting Guidelines, Review of Methodological Standards, and Challenges Toward Harmonization in Bone Marrow Adiposity Research. Report of the Methodologies Working Group of the International Bone Marrow Adiposity Society.

Authors:  Josefine Tratwal; Rossella Labella; Nathalie Bravenboer; Greet Kerckhofs; Eleni Douni; Erica L Scheller; Sammy Badr; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Sarah Beck-Cormier; Biagio Palmisano; Antonella Poloni; Maria J Moreno-Aliaga; Jackie Fretz; Matthew S Rodeheffer; Parastoo Boroumand; Clifford J Rosen; Mark C Horowitz; Bram C J van der Eerden; Annegreet G Veldhuis-Vlug; Olaia Naveiras
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  Bone marrow adipocytes resist lipolysis and remodeling in response to β-adrenergic stimulation.

Authors:  Erica L Scheller; Shaima Khandaker; Brian S Learman; William P Cawthorn; Lindsay M Anderson; H A Pham; Hero Robles; Zhaohua Wang; Ziru Li; Sebastian D Parlee; Becky R Simon; Hiroyuki Mori; Adam J Bree; Clarissa S Craft; Ormond A MacDougald
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Presence of Neovascularization in Torn Plantar Plates of the Lesser Metatarsophalangeal Joints.

Authors:  Natalie V Singer; Noah E Saunders; James R Holmes; David M Walton; Fred T Finney; Karl J Jepsen; Paul G Talusan
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 9.  Future of the Renal Biopsy: Time to Change the Conventional Modality Using Nanotechnology.

Authors:  Hamid Tayebi Khosroshahi; Behzad Abedi; Sabalan Daneshvar; Yashar Sarbaz; Abolhassan Shakeri Bavil
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2017-02-19

10.  Region-specific variation in the properties of skeletal adipocytes reveals regulated and constitutive marrow adipose tissues.

Authors:  Erica L Scheller; Casey R Doucette; Brian S Learman; William P Cawthorn; Shaima Khandaker; Benjamin Schell; Brent Wu; Shi-Ying Ding; Miriam A Bredella; Pouneh K Fazeli; Basma Khoury; Karl J Jepsen; Paul F Pilch; Anne Klibanski; Clifford J Rosen; Ormond A MacDougald
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.