Literature DB >> 25783011

The Role of Water Compartments in the Material Properties of Cortical Bone.

Mathilde Granke1, Mark D Does, Jeffry S Nyman.   

Abstract

Comprising ~20% of the volume, water is a key determinant of the mechanical behavior of cortical bone. It essentially exists in two general compartments: within pores and bound to the matrix. The amount of pore water-residing in the vascular-lacunar-canalicular space-primarily reflects intracortical porosity (i.e., open spaces within the matrix largely due to Haversian canals and resorption sites) and as such is inversely proportional to most mechanical properties of bone. Movement of water according to pressure gradients generated during dynamic loading likely confers hydraulic stiffening to the bone as well. Nonetheless, bound water is a primary contributor to the mechanical behavior of bone in that it is responsible for giving collagen the ability to confer ductility or plasticity to bone (i.e., allows deformation to continue once permanent damage begins to form in the matrix) and decreases with age along with fracture resistance. Thus, dehydration by air-drying or by solvents with less hydrogen bonding capacity causes bone to become brittle, but interestingly, it also increases stiffness and strength across the hierarchical levels of organization. Despite the importance of matrix hydration to fracture resistance, little is known about why bound water decreases with age in hydrated human bone. Using (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), both bound and pore water concentrations in bone can be measured ex vivo because the proton relaxation times differ between the two water compartments, giving rise to two distinct signals. There are also emerging techniques to measure bound and pore water in vivo with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The NMR/MRI-derived bound water concentration is positively correlated with both the strength and toughness of hydrated bone and may become a useful clinical marker of fracture risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25783011      PMCID: PMC4526331          DOI: 10.1007/s00223-015-9977-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  97 in total

1.  Diffusion of exchangeable water in cortical bone studied by nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Maria A Fernández-Seara; Suzanne L Wehrli; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Mechanical properties of porcine femoral cortical bone measured by nanoindentation.

Authors:  Liang Feng; Michael Chittenden; Jeffrey Schirer; Michelle Dickinson; Iwona Jasiuk
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Hydraulic strengthening affects the stiffness and strength of cortical bone.

Authors:  Michael A K Liebschner; Tony S Keller
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Physiocochemical structure of bone.

Authors:  R A Robinson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure.

Authors:  R W McCalden; J A McGeough; M B Barker; C M Court-Brown
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Effect of water on piezoelectric, dielectric, and elastic properties of bone.

Authors:  H Maeda; E Fukada
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  Nanoindentation discriminates the elastic properties of individual human bone lamellae under dry and physiological conditions.

Authors:  S Hengsberger; A Kulik; Ph Zysset
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Clinically compatible MRI strategies for discriminating bound and pore water in cortical bone.

Authors:  R Adam Horch; Daniel F Gochberg; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Non-destructive characterization of microdamage in cortical bone using low field pulsed NMR.

Authors:  Daniel P Nicolella; Qingwen Ni; Kwai S Chan
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2010-11-21

10.  Nanomechanical Characterization of Canine Femur Bone for Strain Rate Sensitivity in the Quasistatic Range under Dry versus Wet Conditions.

Authors:  Kun-Lin Lee; Marta Baldassarri; Nikhil Gupta; Dinesh Pinisetty; Malvin N Janal; Nick Tovar; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-12-25
View more
  55 in total

1.  Zoledronate treatment has different effects in mouse strains with contrasting baseline bone mechanical phenotypes.

Authors:  M W Aref; E M B McNerny; D Brown; K J Jepsen; M R Allen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Microstructure, mineral and mechanical properties of teleost intermuscular bones.

Authors:  I A K Fiedler; S Zeveleva; A Duarte; X Zhao; B Depalle; L Cardoso; S Jin; J P Berteau
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images.

Authors:  Dieter H Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Rad GTPase is essential for the regulation of bone density and bone marrow adipose tissue in mice.

Authors:  Catherine N Withers; Drew M Brown; Innocent Byiringiro; Matthew R Allen; Keith W Condon; Jonathan Satin; Douglas A Andres
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  Vibrational spectroscopic techniques to assess bone quality.

Authors:  E P Paschalis; S Gamsjaeger; K Klaushofer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Cortical bone quality affectations and their strength impact analysis using holographic interferometry.

Authors:  Cesar G Tavera Ruiz; Manuel H De La Torre-Ibarra; J M Flores-Moreno; Claudio Frausto-Reyes; Fernando Mendoza Santoyo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 7.  Cortical Bone Porosity: What Is It, Why Is It Important, and How Can We Detect It?

Authors:  D M L Cooper; C E Kawalilak; K Harrison; B D Johnston; J D Johnston
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 8.  Post-yield and failure properties of cortical bone.

Authors:  Uwe Wolfram; Jakob Schwiedrzik
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-08-24

9.  Age-related changes in the fracture resistance of male Fischer F344 rat bone.

Authors:  Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Alexander J Makowski; Mark D Does; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  The Behavior of Water in Collagen and Hydroxyapatite Sites of Cortical Bone: Fracture, Mechanical Wear, and Load Bearing Studies.

Authors:  Farhana Gul-E-Noor; Chandan Singh; Antonios Papaioannou; Neeraj Sinha; Gregory S Boutis
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.126

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.