Literature DB >> 23624930

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging safety following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Jason W Curtis1, Donna C Lesniak, James H Wible, Pamela K Woodard.   

Abstract

In the first 8 weeks after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), possible negative interactions exist between the cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging environment and the weakly ferromagnetic material in coronary stents. There are circumstances when CMR would be indicated shortly following PCI, such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The purpose of this study is to demonstrate CMR safety shortly following stent PCI in AMI patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of safety data in AMI patients with recently placed coronary artery stents enrolled in a multi-center phase II trial for gadoversetamide. Patients underwent 1.5 T CMR within 16 days of PCI. Vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature) and ECGs were taken pre-CMR, 1, 2, and 24 h post-CMR. Any major adverse cardiac event (MACE) or other serious adverse events in the first 24 h after MRI were recorded. There were 258 stents in 211 AMI patients. The mean delay to CMR following PCI was 6.5 ± 4 days, with 62 patients (29 %) receiving CMR within 3 days and 132 patients (63 %) within 1 week. Patients showed no significant vital sign changes following CMR. Ten patients (4.7 %) showed mild, transient ECG changes. Within the 24-h follow-up group, 4 patients (1.9 %) had moderate to severe events, including chest pain (1) and elevated cardiac enzymes (1), resolving in 24 h; heart failure (1) and ischemic stroke (1). There were no deaths. This study demonstrates fewer MACE in AMI patients undergoing 1.5 T CMR within 16 days of stent placement in comparison to post-stent event rate reported in the literature. This study adds to the CMR after stent PCI safety profile suggested by previous studies and is the largest and first study that uses multicenter data to assess stent safety following CMR examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23624930     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0231-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  18 in total

1.  Metallic stents: evaluation of MR imaging safety.

Authors:  F G Shellock; V J Shellock
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Coronary arterial stents: safety and artifacts during MR imaging.

Authors:  J Hug; E Nagel; A Bornstedt; B Schnackenburg; H Oswald; E Fleck
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the hyperacute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Eric Larose; Julie Côté; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Bernard Noël; Gerald Barbeau; Edith Bordeleau; Santiago Miró; Bernard Brochu; Robert Delarochellière; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Aernout M Beek; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Safety of magnetic resonance imaging one to three days after bare metal and drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Italo Porto; Joseph Selvanayagam; Vaishali Ashar; Stefan Neubauer; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Absence of adverse outcomes after magnetic resonance imaging early after stent placement for acute myocardial infarction: a preliminary study.

Authors:  C M Kramer; W J Rogers; D L Pakstis
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging seems safe in patients with intracoronary stents.

Authors:  A P Schroeder; K Houlind; E M Pedersen; L Thuesen; T T Nielsen; H Egeblad
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Clinical safety of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T early after stent placement for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jérôme Jehl; Alexandre Comte; Sébastien Aubry; Nicolas Meneveau; François Schiele; Bruno Kastler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Safety of gadoversetamide in patients with acute and chronic myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S Huber; R Muthupillai; B Cheong; J H Wible; D Shah; P Woodard; F Grothues; H Mahrholdt; C E Rochitte; O Masoli; R J Kim; C M Schwaiger; A Fuisz; C Kramer; A C van Rossum; R Biederman; M Lombardi; E Martin; R Kevorkian; S D Flamm
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Clinical safety of magnetic resonance imaging early after coronary artery stent placement.

Authors:  Thomas C Gerber; Panayotis Fasseas; Ryan J Lennon; Venkata U Valeti; Christopher P Wood; Jerome F Breen; Peter B Berger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2013 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.