Literature DB >> 11545106

Magnetic resonance imaging seems safe in patients with intracoronary stents.

A P Schroeder1, K Houlind, E M Pedersen, L Thuesen, T T Nielsen, H Egeblad.   

Abstract

We elucidated whether exposure to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with implanted intracoronary stents is associated with increased risk of stent-thrombosis, stent-restenosis, or other cardiovascular complications. Forty-seven patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were studied. Twenty-three were included in a serial cardiac MRI study, using 1.5-T scanners with standard gradient systems. The remaining patients were control subjects who were matched for age and gender with the MRI group. All patient had intracoronary stents implanted in connection with primary angioplastic treatment (PTCA) of AMI (n = 21), secondary PTCA procedures due to recurrent angina (n = 22), or both (n = 4). In the MRI group (n = 23, aged 58 +/- 10 yr), MRI was carried out one to five times in each patient a median of 166 days (range, 1-501) after stent implantation. The control group comprised 24 patients, ages 59 +/- 11 yr. The incidences of stent-thrombosis, stent-restenosis, and other cardiovascular complications did not differ statistically significantly between the two groups. In the MRI group, stent-related thrombosis (n = 1) or restenosis (n = 7) was observed in eight cases a median of 102 days (range, 7-547) after MR examination and a median of 318 days (range, 138-713) after stent implantation, compared with nine cases in the control group (thrombosis, n = 1; restenosis, n = 8) observed a median of 147 days (range, 1-267) after stent implantation. No acute thromboembolic or other complication occurred in immediate connection with MRI. The follow-up time was 21.3 +/- 4.5 months. This small study shows no evidence of an MRI-related risk of stent-restenosis or other cardiovascular complications, not even if cardiac MRI is performed early after stent implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11545106     DOI: 10.3109/10976640009148672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  6 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging safety following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jason W Curtis; Donna C Lesniak; James H Wible; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Detailing radio frequency heating induced by coronary stents: a 7.0 Tesla magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Davide Santoro; Lukas Winter; Alexander Müller; Julia Vogt; Wolfgang Renz; Celal Ozerdem; Andreas Grässl; Valeriy Tkachenko; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  3.0 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients treated with coronary stenting for myocardial infarction: evaluation of short term safety and image quality.

Authors:  Robin Nijveldt; Alexander Hirsch; Mark B M Hofman; Aernout M Beek; Anje M Spijkerboer; Jan J Piek; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary arteries.

Authors:  S C Gerretsen; M E Kooi; S Schalla; T Delhaas; G Snoep; J M A Van Engelshoven; T Leiner
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.167

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.