Literature DB >> 19025944

Safety of gadoversetamide in patients with acute and chronic myocardial infarction.

S Huber1, R Muthupillai, B Cheong, J H Wible, D Shah, P Woodard, F Grothues, H Mahrholdt, C E Rochitte, O Masoli, R J Kim, C M Schwaiger, A Fuisz, C Kramer, A C van Rossum, R Biederman, M Lombardi, E Martin, R Kevorkian, S D Flamm.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the safety data from two large, multicenter, phase 2 trials on the use of gadoversetamide (OptiMARK, Tyco Healthcare/Mallinckrodt, St. Louis, MO) as a contrast agent in delayed hyperenhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) in patients with acute and chronic myocardial infarction (MI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population from both trials comprised 577 patients who were randomly assigned to one of four dose groups (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mmol/kg) before undergoing DE-MRI. Safety evaluations included physical and electrocardiographic (ECG) examinations. Vital signs, laboratory values, adverse events (AE), and serious adverse events (SAE) were monitored before and after contrast administration.
RESULTS: Of the 577 patients who received gadoversetamide, 124 (21.5%) reported a total of 164 AEs; most were mild (139 AEs; 84.8%) or moderate (25 AEs; 15.2%). ECG-related changes were the most frequent AE. Site investigators judged only eight AEs as likely related to gadoversetamide and only two of the eight as clinically relevant. Further evaluation suggested neither AE was related to gadoversetamide. Two SAEs were reported, but none was judged related to gadoversetamide by the site investigators.
CONCLUSION: Gadoversetamide is safe for use in patients with acute or chronic MI up to a dose of 0.3 mmol/kg. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19025944     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

1.  Adaptive removal of gradients-induced artefacts on ECG in MRI: a performance analysis of RLS filtering.

Authors:  Mario Sansone; Luciano Mirarchi; Marcello Bracale
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  The Impact of Excess Ligand on the Retention of Nonionic, Linear Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Patients With Various Levels of Renal Dysfunction: A Review and Simulation Analysis.

Authors:  John P Prybylski; Michael Jay
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.620

3.  Gadolinium can depict area at risk and myocardial infarction: a double-edged sword?

Authors:  Andrew E Arai
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06

4.  Three-dimensional maximum principal strain using cardiac computed tomography for identification of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yuki Tanabe; Teruhito Kido; Akira Kurata; Shun Sawada; Hiroshi Suekuni; Tomoyuki Kido; Takahiro Yokoi; Teruyoshi Uetani; Katsuji Inoue; Masao Miyagawa; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging safety following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jason W Curtis; Donna C Lesniak; James H Wible; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.