Literature DB >> 10966711

Coronary arterial stents: safety and artifacts during MR imaging.

J Hug1, E Nagel, A Bornstedt, B Schnackenburg, H Oswald, E Fleck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the safety and imaging artifacts with different coronary arterial stents and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The heating, artifacts, and ferromagnetism with different stents were studied with a 1.5-T MR tomograph with ultrafast gradients by using turbo spin-echo, turbo gradient-echo, and echo-planar imaging sequences. Nineteen stents, which were 8-25 mm in length and 3.0-4.5 mm in diameter, were evaluated. Stent deviation induced by the magnetic field and during MR imaging, migration, and heating caused by the radio-frequency pulses were examined. The size of imaging artifacts was measured with all the stents under standardized conditions and with six stents after their implantation into the coronary arteries of freshly explanted pig hearts.
RESULTS: All except two types of stents showed minimal ferromagnetism. No device migration or heating was induced. Turbo spin-echo images had minimal artifacts; larger artifacts were seen on the turbo gradient-echo and echo-planar images. With ultrafast gradients, the artifacts on the echo-planar images were substantially reduced.
CONCLUSION: The studied coronary stents were not influenced by heating or motion during 1.5-T MR imaging. Artifact size differed according to the type and size of the stent and the MR imaging sequence used. Thus, patients with these stents can be safely examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10966711     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se03781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  19 in total

1.  Magnetic stents retain nanoparticle-bound antirestenotic drugs transported by lipid microbubbles.

Authors:  T Räthel; H Mannell; J Pircher; B Gleich; U Pohl; F Krötz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Detachable coil for cerebral aneurysms: in vitro evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 3T.

Authors:  Frank G Shellock; Matthew Gounis; Ajay Wakhloo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Safety of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with cardiovascular implants and devices.

Authors:  S K Prasad; D J Pennell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the hyperacute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Eric Larose; Julie Côté; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Bernard Noël; Gerald Barbeau; Edith Bordeleau; Santiago Miró; Bernard Brochu; Robert Delarochellière; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Blankenstein; B T Truong; A Thomas; N Thieme; C Zachriat
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  MRI with intraoral orthodontic appliance-a comparative in vitro and in vivo study of image artefacts at 1.5 T.

Authors:  C Zachriat; P Asbach; K I Blankenstein; I Peroz; F H Blankenstein
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents.

Authors:  David Maintz; Harald Seifarth; Rainer Raupach; Thomas Flohr; Michael Rink; Torsten Sommer; Murat Ozgün; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Intravascular Photoacoustic Imaging.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Jimmy L Su; Andrei B Karpiouk; Konstantin V Sokolov; Richard W Smalling; Stanislav Y Emelianov
Journal:  IEEE J Quantum Electron       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 2.318

9.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging safety following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jason W Curtis; Donna C Lesniak; James H Wible; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  MRI in patients with cardiac devices.

Authors:  Edward T Martin; David A Sandler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.