PURPOSE: Our study aimed to explore the optimal timing as well as the most appropriate prognostic parameter of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for an early prediction of outcome for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: Serial PET data (before and three times during CRT) of 37 patients with advanced stage HNSCC, receiving combined CRT between 2005 and 2009, were evaluated. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), the average SUV (SUV(mean)) and the gross tumour volume determined by FDG PET (GTV PET), based on a source to background algorithm, were analysed. Stratified actuarial analysis was performed for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional control (LRC). The median follow-up time was 26 months (range 8-50). RESULTS: For all patients, OS was 51%, DFS 44% and LRC 55% after 2 years. The 2-year OS (88%) and 2-year LRC (88%) were higher for patients whose SUV(max) of the primary tumour decreased 50% or more from the beginning (0 Gy) to week 1 or 2 (10 or 20 Gy) of CRT (ΔSUV(max10/20) ≥ 50%) than for patients with ΔSUV(max20) < 50% (2-year OS = 38%; p = 0.02; 2-year LRC 40%; p = 0.06). A pretreatment GTV PET below the median of 10.2 ml predicted a better 2-year OS (34% for GTV PET ≥ 10.2 ml vs 83% for GTV PET < 10.2 ml; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The decrease of SUV(max) from before (0 Gy) to week 1 or 2 (10 or 20 Gy) of CRT is a potential prognostic marker for patients with HNSCC. Because GTV PET depends on the applied method of analysis, we suggest the use of SUV(max), especially ΔSUV(max10/20), for an early estimation of therapy outcome. Confirmatory studies are warranted.
PURPOSE: Our study aimed to explore the optimal timing as well as the most appropriate prognostic parameter of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for an early prediction of outcome for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: Serial PET data (before and three times during CRT) of 37 patients with advanced stage HNSCC, receiving combined CRT between 2005 and 2009, were evaluated. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), the average SUV (SUV(mean)) and the gross tumour volume determined by FDG PET (GTV PET), based on a source to background algorithm, were analysed. Stratified actuarial analysis was performed for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional control (LRC). The median follow-up time was 26 months (range 8-50). RESULTS: For all patients, OS was 51%, DFS 44% and LRC 55% after 2 years. The 2-year OS (88%) and 2-year LRC (88%) were higher for patients whose SUV(max) of the primary tumour decreased 50% or more from the beginning (0 Gy) to week 1 or 2 (10 or 20 Gy) of CRT (ΔSUV(max10/20) ≥ 50%) than for patients with ΔSUV(max20) < 50% (2-year OS = 38%; p = 0.02; 2-year LRC 40%; p = 0.06). A pretreatment GTV PET below the median of 10.2 ml predicted a better 2-year OS (34% for GTV PET ≥ 10.2 ml vs 83% for GTV PET < 10.2 ml; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The decrease of SUV(max) from before (0 Gy) to week 1 or 2 (10 or 20 Gy) of CRT is a potential prognostic marker for patients with HNSCC. Because GTV PET depends on the applied method of analysis, we suggest the use of SUV(max), especially ΔSUV(max10/20), for an early estimation of therapy outcome. Confirmatory studies are warranted.
Authors: Vincent Grégoire; Peter Levendag; Kian K Ang; Jacques Bernier; Marijel Braaksma; Volker Budach; Cliff Chao; Emmanuel Coche; Jay S Cooper; Guy Cosnard; Avraham Eisbruch; Samy El-Sayed; Bahman Emami; Cai Grau; Marc Hamoir; Nancy Lee; Philippe Maingon; Karin Muller; Hervé Reychler Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: David L Schwartz; Joseph Rajendran; Bevan Yueh; Marc D Coltrera; Michael Leblanc; Janet Eary; Kenneth Krohn Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2004-12
Authors: Melanie B Fukui; Todd M Blodgett; Carl H Snyderman; Jonas J Johnson; Eugene N Myers; Dave W Townsend; Carolyn C Meltzer Journal: Radiographics Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Eva Brun; Elisabeth Kjellén; Jan Tennvall; Tomas Ohlsson; Anders Sandell; Roland Perfekt; Roland Perfekt; Johan Wennerberg; Sven Erik Strand Journal: Head Neck Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Trang H La; Edith J Filion; Brit B Turnbull; Jackie N Chu; Percy Lee; Khoa Nguyen; Peter Maxim; Andy Quon; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo; Quynh-Thu Le Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-03-14 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: C G Rhodes; R J Wise; J M Gibbs; R S Frackowiak; J Hatazawa; A J Palmer; D G Thomas; T Jones Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1983-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Joël Castelli; A Depeursinge; A Devillers; B Campillo-Gimenez; Y Dicente; J O Prior; E Chajon; F Jegoux; C Sire; O Acosta; E Gherga; X Sun; B De Bari; J Bourhis; R de Crevoisier Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Peter Lin; Myo Min; Mark Lee; Lois Holloway; Dion Forstner; Victoria Bray; Allan Fowler Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Gianpiero Manca; Eleonora Vanzi; Domenico Rubello; Francesco Giammarile; Gaia Grassetto; Ka Kit Wong; Alan C Perkins; Patrick M Colletti; Duccio Volterrani Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 9.236