Literature DB >> 27163282

Potential Role of PET/MRI for Imaging Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer.

Sungheon Gene Kim1,2, Kent Friedman1,2, Sohil Patel1,2, Mari Hagiwara1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article explores recent developments in PET and MRI, separately or combined, for assessing metastatic lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer.
CONCLUSION: The synergistic role of PET and MRI for imaging metastatic lymph nodes has not been fully explored. To facilitate the understanding of the areas that need further investigation, we discuss potential mechanisms and evidence reported so far, as well as future directions and challenges for continued development and clinical research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; PET; head and neck cancer; lymph nodes; metastasis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27163282      PMCID: PMC5756667          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.16265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  91 in total

1.  Results of a prospective study of positron emission tomography-directed management of residual nodal abnormalities in node-positive head and neck cancer after definitive radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy.

Authors:  Sandro V Porceddu; David I Pryor; Elizabeth Burmeister; Bryan H Burmeister; Michael G Poulsen; Matthew C Foote; Benedict Panizza; Scott Coman; David McFarlane; William Coman
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  On the origin of cancer cells.

Authors:  O WARBURG
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Sixteenth Daniel C. Baker, Jr, memorial lecture. Surgical management of supraglottic cancer and its lymph node metastases in a conservative perspective.

Authors:  E Bocca
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 4.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Response assessment by combined PET-CT scan versus CT scan alone using RECIST in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  V A Passero; B F Branstetter; Y Shuai; D E Heron; M K Gibson; S Y Lai; S W Kim; J R Grandis; R L Ferris; J T Johnson; A Argiris
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Prediction of survival with fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxyglucose and PET in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  H Minn; M Lapela; P J Klemi; R Grénman; S Leskinen; P Lindholm; J Bergman; E Eronen; M Haaparanta; H Joensuu
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting and detecting early response to chemoradiation therapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

Authors:  Sungheon Kim; Laurie Loevner; Harry Quon; Eric Sherman; Gregory Weinstein; Alex Kilger; Harish Poptani
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Use of decision analysis in planning a management strategy for the stage N0 neck.

Authors:  M H Weiss; L B Harrison; R S Isaacs
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-07

9.  Can FDG PET predict radiation treatment outcome in head and neck cancer? Results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Dominic A X Schinagl; Paul N Span; Wim J Oyen; Johannes H A M Kaanders
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  FDG-PET. A possible prognostic factor in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  W Halfpenny; S F Hain; L Biassoni; M N Maisey; J A Sherman; M McGurk
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-02-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  The impact of 18F-FDG PET on initial staging and therapy planning of pediatric soft-tissue sarcoma patients.

Authors:  Alaa Elmanzalawy; Reza Vali; Govind B Chavhan; Abha A Gupta; Yusuf Omarkhail; Afsaneh Amirabadi; Amer Shammas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-10-18

2.  Use of Quantitative Morphological and Functional Features for Assessment of Axillary Lymph Node in Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Roberta Fusco; Mario Sansone; Vincenza Granata; Maurizio Di Bonito; Franca Avino; Orlando Catalano; Gerardo Botti; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  The Prognostic Role of Maximum Standardized Uptake Value of 18 F-FlouroDeoxy Glucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Kondaveeti Satish Srinivas; M Arunan; E Venkatachalapathy; Christopher John; M Manickavasagam; C V Divyambika
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2019-04-12

4.  Usefulness of Hybrid PET/MRI in Clinical Evaluation of Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Natalia Samolyk-Kogaczewska; Ewa Sierko; Dorota Dziemianczyk-Pakiela; Klaudia Beata Nowaszewska; Malgorzata Lukasik; Joanna Reszec
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Correlation between histogram-based DCE-MRI parameters and 18F-FDG PET values in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Evaluation in primary tumors and metastatic nodes.

Authors:  Antonello Vidiri; Emma Gangemi; Emanuela Ruberto; Rosella Pasqualoni; Rosa Sciuto; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Alessia Farneti; Maria Benevolo; Francesca Rollo; Francesca Sperati; Filomena Spasiano; Raul Pellini; Simona Marzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Assessment of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas using simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET and MRI.

Authors:  Jenny Chen; Mari Hagiwara; Babak Givi; Brian Schmidt; Cheng Liu; Qi Chen; Jean Logan; Artem Mikheev; Henry Rusinek; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.