OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to test and demonstrate the feasibility of simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and upper neck area using a new hybrid PET/MRI system. METHODS: Eight patients with malignant head and neck tumours were included in the pilot study. Directly after routine PET/CT imaging with a whole-body system using the glucose derivative 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) as a radiotracer additional measurements were performed with a prototype PET/MRI system for simultaneous PET and MR imaging. Physiological radiotracer uptake within regular anatomical structures as well as tumour uptake were evaluated visually and semiquantitatively (metabolic ratios) in relation to cerebellar uptake on the PET/MRI and PET/CT systems. RESULTS: The MR datasets showed excellent image quality without any recognisable artefacts caused by the inserted PET system. PET images obtained with the PET/MRI system exhibited better detailed resolution and greater image contrast in comparison to those from the PET/CT system. An excellent agreement between metabolic ratios obtained with both PET systems was found: R = 0.99 for structures with physiological tracer uptake, R = 0.96 for tumours. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous PET/MRI of the head and upper neck area is feasible with the new hybrid PET/MRI prototype.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to test and demonstrate the feasibility of simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and upper neck area using a new hybrid PET/MRI system. METHODS: Eight patients with malignant head and neck tumours were included in the pilot study. Directly after routine PET/CT imaging with a whole-body system using the glucose derivative 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) as a radiotracer additional measurements were performed with a prototype PET/MRI system for simultaneous PET and MR imaging. Physiological radiotracer uptake within regular anatomical structures as well as tumour uptake were evaluated visually and semiquantitatively (metabolic ratios) in relation to cerebellar uptake on the PET/MRI and PET/CT systems. RESULTS: The MR datasets showed excellent image quality without any recognisable artefacts caused by the inserted PET system. PET images obtained with the PET/MRI system exhibited better detailed resolution and greater image contrast in comparison to those from the PET/CT system. An excellent agreement between metabolic ratios obtained with both PET systems was found: R = 0.99 for structures with physiological tracer uptake, R = 0.96 for tumours. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous PET/MRI of the head and upper neck area is feasible with the new hybrid PET/MRI prototype.
Authors: Marco Brambilla; Chiara Secco; Marco Dominietto; Roberta Matheoud; Gianmauro Sacchetti; Eugenio Inglese Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Martin S Judenhofer; Hans F Wehrl; Danny F Newport; Ciprian Catana; Stefan B Siegel; Markus Becker; Axel Thielscher; Manfred Kneilling; Matthias P Lichy; Martin Eichner; Karin Klingel; Gerald Reischl; Stefan Widmaier; Martin Röcken; Robert E Nutt; Hans-Jürgen Machulla; Kamil Uludag; Simon R Cherry; Claus D Claussen; Bernd J Pichler Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-03-23 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Gerhard W Goerres; Katarzyna Mosna-Firlejczyk; Johann Steurer; Gustav K von Schulthess; Lucas M Bachmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: P Bruschini; A Giorgetti; L Bruschini; A Nacci; D Volterrani; M Cosottini; F Ursino; G Mariani; B Fattori Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 2.124
Authors: S D Rege; L Chaiken; C K Hoh; Y Choi; R Lufkin; Y Anzai; G Juillard; J Maddahi; M E Phelps; R A Hawkins Journal: Radiology Date: 1993-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: B A Jabour; Y Choi; C K Hoh; S D Rege; J C Soong; R B Lufkin; W N Hanafee; J Maddahi; L Chaiken; J Bailet Journal: Radiology Date: 1993-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: K Kubiessa; S Purz; M Gawlitza; A Kühn; J Fuchs; K G Steinhoff; A Boehm; O Sabri; R Kluge; T Kahn; P Stumpp Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-11-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sasan Partovi; Andres Kohan; Christian Rubbert; Jose Luis Vercher-Conejero; Chiara Gaeta; Roger Yuh; Lisa Zipp; Karin A Herrmann; Mark R Robbin; Zhenghong Lee; Raymond F Muzic; Peter Faulhaber; Pablo R Ros Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-03-20
Authors: J H Rasmussen; B M Fischer; M C Aznar; A E Hansen; I R Vogelius; J Löfgren; F L Andersen; A Loft; A Kjaer; L Højgaard; L Specht Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Svetlana Balyasnikova; Johan Löfgren; Robin de Nijs; Yanna Zamogilnaya; Liselotte Højgaard; Barbara M Fischer Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-10-15
Authors: Marco Wiesmüller; Harald H Quick; Bharath Navalpakkam; Michael M Lell; Michael Uder; Philipp Ritt; Daniela Schmidt; Michael Beck; Torsten Kuwert; Carl C von Gall Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-10-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sasan Partovi; Andres A Kohan; Lisa Zipp; Peter Faulhaber; Christos Kosmas; Pablo R Ros; Mark R Robbin Journal: Int J Clin Exp Med Date: 2014-03-15
Authors: Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Kent Friedman; Hersh Chandarana; Amy Melsaether; Linda Moy; Yu-Shin Ding; Komal Jhaveri; Luis Beltran; Rajan Jain Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 3.959