Literature DB >> 23620267

The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy.

Elpida Fragouli1, Samer Alfarawati, Katharina Spath, Souraya Jaroudi, Jonas Sarasa, Maria Enciso, Dagan Wells.   

Abstract

Despite the clinical importance of aneuploidy, surprisingly little is known concerning its impact during the earliest stages of human development. This study aimed to shed light on the genesis, progression, and survival of different types of chromosome anomaly from the fertilized oocyte through the final stage of preimplantation development (blastocyst). 2,204 oocytes and embryos were examined using comprehensive cytogenetic methodology. A diverse array of chromosome abnormalities was detected, including many forms never recorded later in development. Advancing female age was associated with dramatic increase in aneuploidy rate and complex chromosomal abnormalities. Anaphase lag and congression failure were found to be important malsegregation causing mechanisms in oogenesis and during the first few mitotic divisions. All abnormalities appeared to be tolerated until activation of the embryonic genome, after which some forms started to decline in frequency. However, many aneuploidies continued to have little impact, with affected embryos successfully reaching the blastocyst stage. Results from the direct analyses of female meiotic divisions and early embryonic stages suggest that chromosome errors present during preimplantation development have origins that are more varied than those seen in later pregnancy, raising the intriguing possibility that the source of aneuploidy might modulate impact on embryo viability. The results of this study also narrow the window of time for selection against aneuploid embryos, indicating that most survive until the blastocyst stage and, since they are not detected in clinical pregnancies, must be lost around the time of implantation or shortly thereafter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23620267     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-013-1309-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  43 in total

1.  Chromosome mosaicism in cleavage-stage human embryos: evidence of a maternal age effect.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Mireia Sandalinas; Tomas Escudero; Carmen Márquez; Jacques Cohen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Molecular studies of parental origin and mosaicism in 45,X conceptuses.

Authors:  T Hassold; D Pettay; A Robinson; I Uchida
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Multiple meiotic errors caused by predivision of chromatids in women of advanced maternal age undergoing in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  Alan H Handyside; Markus Montag; M Cristina Magli; Sjoerd Repping; Joyce Harper; Andreas Schmutzler; Katerina Vesela; Luca Gianaroli; Joep Geraedts
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Could sperm aneuploidy rate determination be used as a predictive test before intracytoplasmic sperm injection?

Authors:  François M Petit; Nelly Frydman; Moncef Benkhalifa; Anne Le Du; Azzedine Aboura; Renato Fanchin; Rene Frydman; Gerard Tachdjian
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr

5.  Polar body analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization accurately predicts aneuploidies of maternal meiotic origin in cleavage stage embryos of women of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Dimitra Christopikou; Erika Tsorva; Konstantinos Economou; Piran Shelley; Stephen Davies; Minas Mastrominas; Alan H Handyside
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Multicolour FISH detects frequent chromosomal mosaicism and chaotic division in normal preimplantation embryos from fertile patients.

Authors:  J D Delhanty; J C Harper; A Ao; A H Handyside; R M Winston
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in women older than 37 years.

Authors:  Peter Platteau; Catherine Staessen; An Michiels; Andre Van Steirteghem; Inge Liebaers; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Chromosomal abnormalities in a series of 6,733 human oocytes in preimplantation diagnosis for age-related aneuploidies.

Authors:  Anver Kuliev; Jeanine Cieslak; Yury Ilkevitch; Yury Verlinsky
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Alteration of gene expression in human cumulus cells as a potential indicator of oocyte aneuploidy.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli; Dagan Wells; Amy E Iager; Umit A Kayisli; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Maternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: new data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes.

Authors:  Franck Pellestor; Brigitte Andréo; Françoise Arnal; Claude Humeau; Jacques Demaille
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  80 in total

1.  Mathematical modeling of human oocyte aneuploidy.

Authors:  Katarzyna M Tyc; Rajiv C McCoy; Karen Schindler; Jinchuan Xing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Chromosomal abnormalities in products of conception of first-trimester miscarriages detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis: a review of 1000 cases.

Authors:  Larysa Y Pylyp; Lyudmyla O Spynenko; Nataliya V Verhoglyad; Anna O Mishenko; Dmytro O Mykytenko; Valery D Zukin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Cytogenetic Analysis of the Products of Conception After Spontaneous Abortion in the First Trimester.

Authors:  Xueluo Zhang; Junmei Fan; Yanhua Chen; Jun Wang; Zhijiao Song; Jinghui Zhao; Zhongyun Li; Xueqing Wu; Yuanjing Hu
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Trends, fads and ART!

Authors:  Brian Dale; Yves Menezo; Gianfranco Coppola
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The frequency of precocious segregation of sister chromatids in mouse female meiosis I is affected by genetic background.

Authors:  Anna Danylevska; Kristina Kovacovicova; Thuraya Awadova; Martin Anger
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Natural selection between day 3 and day 5/6 PGD embryos in couples with reciprocal or Robertsonian translocations.

Authors:  Claire E Beyer; E Willats
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Absolute risks of obstetric outcomes by maternal age at first birth: a population-based cohort.

Authors:  Laura Schummers; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Michele R Hacker; Tyler J VanderWeele; Paige L Williams; Thomas F McElrath; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Next-generation sequencing analysis of each blastomere in good-quality embryos: insights into the origins and mechanisms of embryonic aneuploidy in cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Qiuwen Shi; Ying Qiu; Changlong Xu; Hua Yang; Chunyuan Li; Nina Li; Yumei Gao; Caiyun Yu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Sperm count affects cumulative birth rate of assisted reproduction cycles in relation to ovarian response.

Authors:  Carlotta Zacà; Giovanni Coticchio; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Marco Nadalini; Cristina Lagalla; Andrea Garolla; Andrea Borini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Polymorphisms in the MTHFR gene influence embryo viability and the incidence of aneuploidy.

Authors:  María Enciso; Jonás Sarasa; Leoni Xanthopoulou; Sara Bristow; Megan Bowles; Elpida Fragouli; Joy Delhanty; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.