Literature DB >> 23477909

Polar body analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization accurately predicts aneuploidies of maternal meiotic origin in cleavage stage embryos of women of advanced maternal age.

Dimitra Christopikou1, Erika Tsorva, Konstantinos Economou, Piran Shelley, Stephen Davies, Minas Mastrominas, Alan H Handyside.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: How accurate is array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) analysis of the first polar body (PB1) and second polar body (PB2) in predicting aneuploidies of maternal meiotic origin in the cleavage stage embryos of women of advanced maternal age? SUMMARY ANSWER: Almost all of the aneuploidies detected in cleavage stage embryos were associated with copy number changes in the polar bodies (93%) and all but one (98.5%) were predicted to be aneuploid. A minority of copy number changes (17%), mainly in PB1, did not result in the predicted changes in the embryo, but many of these were small copy number changes, which are likely to be artefacts. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Chromosome aneuploidy is a major cause of pregnancy failure and loss, abnormal pregnancy and live births. Most aneuploidy is of maternal meiotic origin and increases exponentially in the decade preceding the menopause. A pilot study demonstrated a high rate of concordance between the chromosomal status predicted by polar body analysis and the corresponding zygotes in women of advanced maternal age. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: Polar body biopsy and array CGH analysis of mature oocytes, which fertilized normally, to identify segregation errors in meiosis, followed by the analysis of the corresponding cleavage stage embryos (n = 34), in a consecutive series of stimulated and natural IVF cycles in women of advanced maternal age. MATERIALS, SETTING AND METHODS: Twenty couples requesting aneuploidy screening (mean ± SD of maternal age 39 ± 3 years) had 16 controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and 7 natural IVF cycles. PB1 and PB2 were biopsied from mature oocytes, prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and following confirmation of normal fertilization, respectively. Array CGH was used to detect chromosome copy number changes and to predict aneuploidy in the corresponding embryos. Embryos with normal copy number in both polar bodies were transferred but, 34 cleavage stage embryos, most of which were predicted to have one or more aneuploidies of maternal meiotic origin, were analysed in whole after removal of the zona by array CGH, on Day 3 post-ICSI. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Thirty cleavage stage embryos, predicted to have one or more aneuploidies, were all confirmed to be aneuploid (100% concordant). Seventy four aneuploidies were detected in these embryos. Sixty-nine (93%) aneuploidies were associated with copy number changes in the polar bodies and 68 (98.5%) of these had been predicted to be aneuploid. Also, 19 of 20 (95%) balanced combinations of chromatid gain/loss in PB1/PB2 accurately predicted normal copy number in the corresponding embryos. However, 17 (12%) copy number changes in the polar bodies did not result in the expected outcome, including 12 false positive predictions of aneuploidy. Most of these involved copy number changes that were smaller than would be expected for whole chromosome or chromatid imbalance and occurred significantly more often in PB1 than PB2 (P < 0.0005). Three other embryos with only small copy number changes and one embryo with a partial chromosome loss in PB2, were all confirmed to be euploid. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Accurate false positive and negative rates will require follow-up of both euploid and aneuploid embryos, ideally using molecular genetic markers to detect aneuploidy independently and to identify their origin. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Polar body biopsy and array CGH analysis is efficient and accurately predicts most aneuploidies in cleavage stage embryos. However, the size of the ratio shifts, particularly in PB1, should always be compared with the X chromosome shift before it can be concluded that there is a real copy number change. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Study funded by Embryogenesis, Athens. P.S. and A.H.H. are employed full time and part time, respectively, by BlueGnome Ltd, Cambridge, UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23477909     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  15 in total

1.  Chromosomal characteristics at cleavage and blastocyst stages from the same embryos.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Nan Zhao; Xiaozhu Wang; Jie Qiao; Ping Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Rehabilitating human oocytes by polar body transplantation.

Authors:  David F Albertini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Generation of meiomaps of genome-wide recombination and chromosome segregation in human oocytes.

Authors:  Christian S Ottolini; Antonio Capalbo; Louise Newnham; Danilo Cimadomo; Senthilkumar A Natesan; Eva R Hoffmann; Filippo M Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi; Alan H Handyside
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  The combination of calcium ionophore A23187 and GM-CSF can safely salvage aged human unfertilized oocytes after ICSI.

Authors:  Konstantinos A Economou; Dimitra Christopikou; Erika Tsorva; Stephen Davies; Minas Mastrominas; Haris Cazlaris; Michael Koutsilieris; Panagoula Angelogianni; Dimitris Loutradis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Next-generation sequencing analysis of each blastomere in good-quality embryos: insights into the origins and mechanisms of embryonic aneuploidy in cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Qiuwen Shi; Ying Qiu; Changlong Xu; Hua Yang; Chunyuan Li; Nina Li; Yumei Gao; Caiyun Yu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli; Samer Alfarawati; Katharina Spath; Souraya Jaroudi; Jonas Sarasa; Maria Enciso; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Multiple Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes Resulting from Maternal Meiosis I or II Errors.

Authors:  Ron Hochstenbach; Beata Nowakowska; Marianne Volleth; Amber Ummels; Anna Kutkowska-Kaźmierczak; Ewa Obersztyn; Kamila Ziemkiewicz; Claudia Gerloff; Denny Schanze; Martin Zenker; Petra Muschke; Ina Schanze; Martin Poot; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2015-10-31

8.  Increasing live birth rate by preimplantation genetic screening of pooled polar bodies using array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Michael Feichtinger; Tina Stopp; Christian Göbl; Elisabeth Feichtinger; Enrico Vaccari; Ulrike Mädel; Franco Laccone; Monika Stroh-Weigert; Markus Hengstschläger; Wilfried Feichtinger; Jürgen Neesen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Altered levels of mitochondrial DNA are associated with female age, aneuploidy, and provide an independent measure of embryonic implantation potential.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli; Katharina Spath; Samer Alfarawati; Fiona Kaper; Andrew Craig; Claude-Edouard Michel; Felix Kokocinski; Jacques Cohen; Santiago Munne; Dagan Wells
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  New tools for embryo selection: comprehensive chromosome screening by array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Lorena Rodrigo; Emilia Mateu; Amparo Mercader; Ana Cristina Cobo; Vanessa Peinado; Miguel Milán; Nasser Al-Asmar; Inmaculada Campos-Galindo; Sandra García-Herrero; Pere Mir; Carlos Simón; Carmen Rubio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.