Literature DB >> 9187668

Multicolour FISH detects frequent chromosomal mosaicism and chaotic division in normal preimplantation embryos from fertile patients.

J D Delhanty1, J C Harper, A Ao, A H Handyside, R M Winston.   

Abstract

We have used multicolour fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) with DNA probes for chromosomes X, Y and l to analyse spare untransferred cleavage-stage embryos after preimplantation diagnosis to avoid X-linked disease. In total, 93 morphologically normal embryos were available from seven patients (six of proven fertility) who had undergone fourteen in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles. The chromosome patterns observed were classified into four groups; normal, abnormal (non-mosaic), mosaic and chaotic (uncontrolled division). Approximately half of the embryos were normal for the chromosomes tested. Two embryos only were aneuploid (non-mosaic) throughout but, after excluding those showing chaotic division, 30% were considered to be chromosomal mosaics. Of these, a minority had arisen because of mitotic non-disjunction or chromosome loss or gain, whereas the majority were ploidy mosaics, with haploidy being the most common. The occurrence of chaotically dividing embryos was strongly patient-related, i.e. some patients had 'chaotic' embryos in repeated cycles, whereas other patients were completely free of this type of anomaly. 'Chaotic' embryos are unlikely to progress beyond implantation. These findings have important implications both for routine IVF and preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9187668     DOI: 10.1007/s004390050443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  66 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy: were we looking at the wrong chromosomes?

Authors:  M Bahçe; J Cohen; S Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis using fluorescent polymerase chain reaction: results and future developments.

Authors:  I Findlay; P Matthews; P Quirke
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in clinical practice.

Authors:  E Kanavakis; J Traeger-Synodinos
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  Is there any evidence for immunologically mediated or immunologically modifiable early pregnancy failure?

Authors:  David A Clark
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation.

Authors:  D Ioannou; K G L Fonseka; E J Meershoek; A R Thornhill; A Abogrein; M Ellis; D K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Confirmation rates of array-CGH in day-3 embryo and blastocyst biopsies for preimplantation genetic screening.

Authors:  P Mir; E Mateu; A Mercader; R Herrer; L Rodrigo; M Vera; V Peinado; M Milán-Sánchez; I Campos-Galindo; S García-Herrero; C Simón; C Rubio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  The cytogenetics of preimplantation human development: insights provided by traditional and novel techniques.

Authors:  Helen G Tempest; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: present and future.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Multiple meiotic errors caused by predivision of chromatids in women of advanced maternal age undergoing in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  Alan H Handyside; Markus Montag; M Cristina Magli; Sjoerd Repping; Joyce Harper; Andreas Schmutzler; Katerina Vesela; Luca Gianaroli; Joep Geraedts
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 10.  Reproduction in the Noughties: will the scientists have all the fun?

Authors:  M H Johnson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.