Literature DB >> 24935618

The frequency of precocious segregation of sister chromatids in mouse female meiosis I is affected by genetic background.

Anna Danylevska1, Kristina Kovacovicova, Thuraya Awadova, Martin Anger.   

Abstract

Mammalian female gametes frequently suffer from numerical chromosomal aberrations, the main cause of miscarriages and severe developmental defects. The underlying mechanisms responsible for the development of aneuploidy in oocytes are still not completely understood and remain a subject of extensive research. From studies focused on prevalence of aneuploidy in mouse oocytes, it has become obvious that reported rates of aneuploidy are strongly dependent on the method used for chromosome counting. In addition, it seems likely that differences between mouse strains could influence the frequency of aneuploidy as well; however, up till now, such a comparison has not been available. Therefore, in our study, we measured the levels of aneuploidy which has resulted from missegregation in meiosis I, in oocytes of three commonly used mouse strains-CD-1, C3H/HeJ, and C57BL/6. Our results revealed that, although the overall chromosomal numerical aberration rates were similar in all three strains, a different number of oocytes in each strain contained prematurely segregated sister chromatids (PSSC). This indicates that a predisposition for this type of chromosome segregation error in oocyte meiosis I is dependent on genetic background.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24935618     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-014-9428-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  54 in total

1.  Effect of aging on superovulation efficiency, aneuploidy rates, and sister chromatid cohesion in mice aged up to 15 months.

Authors:  Julie A Merriman; Phoebe C Jennings; Eileen A McLaughlin; Keith T Jones
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Rec8-containing cohesin maintains bivalents without turnover during the growing phase of mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Kikuë Tachibana-Konwalski; Jonathan Godwin; Louise van der Weyden; Lysie Champion; Nobuaki R Kudo; David J Adams; Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Aneuploidy in bovine oocytes matured in vitro.

Authors:  D Lechniak; M Switoński
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 4.  Meiosis errors in over 20,000 oocytes studied in the practice of preimplantation aneuploidy testing.

Authors:  Anver Kuliev; Zev Zlatopolsky; Irina Kirillova; Julia Spivakova; Jeanine Cieslak Janzen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  Meiotic recombination and segregation of human-derived artificial chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D D Sears; J H Hegemann; P Hieter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Age-associated increase in aneuploidy and changes in gene expression in mouse eggs.

Authors:  Hua Pan; Pengpeng Ma; Wenting Zhu; Richard M Schultz
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 7.  Genetics of oocyte ageing.

Authors:  U Eichenlaub-Ritter
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1998-10-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Maternal age, morphology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  S Munné; S Chen; P Colls; J Garrisi; X Zheng; N Cekleniak; M Lenzi; P Hughes; J Fischer; M Garrisi; G Tomkin; J Cohen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Frequency of aneuploidy related to age in porcine oocytes.

Authors:  Miroslav Hornak; Michal Jeseta; Petra Musilova; Antonin Pavlok; Michal Kubelka; Jan Motlik; Jiri Rubes; Martin Anger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  MG-132, an inhibitor of proteasomes and calpains, induced inhibition of oocyte maturation and aneuploidy in mouse oocytes.

Authors:  John B Mailhes; Colette Hilliard; Mary Lowery; Steve N London
Journal:  Cell Chromosome       Date:  2002-10-08
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  How oocytes try to get it right: spindle checkpoint control in meiosis.

Authors:  Sandra A Touati; Katja Wassmann
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Human oocytes. Error-prone chromosome-mediated spindle assembly favors chromosome segregation defects in human oocytes.

Authors:  Zuzana Holubcová; Martyn Blayney; Kay Elder; Melina Schuh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Actin-microtubule interplay coordinates spindle assembly in human oocytes.

Authors:  Johannes Roeles; Georgios Tsiavaliaris
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Selfish centromeres and the wastefulness of human reproduction.

Authors:  Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 9.593

5.  Sister kinetochore splitting and precocious disintegration of bivalents could explain the maternal age effect.

Authors:  Agata P Zielinska; Zuzana Holubcova; Martyn Blayney; Kay Elder; Melina Schuh
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  ProTAME Arrest in Mammalian Oocytes and Embryos Does Not Require Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Activity.

Authors:  Lenka Radonova; Tereza Svobodova; Michal Skultety; Ondrej Mrkva; Lenka Libichova; Paula Stein; Martin Anger
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Meiotic Kinetochores Fragment into Multiple Lobes upon Cohesin Loss in Aging Eggs.

Authors:  Agata P Zielinska; Eirini Bellou; Ninadini Sharma; Ann-Sophie Frombach; K Bianka Seres; Jennifer R Gruhn; Martyn Blayney; Heike Eckel; Rüdiger Moltrecht; Kay Elder; Eva R Hoffmann; Melina Schuh
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 10.834

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.