Literature DB >> 23611753

Usefulness of Q-wave area for threshold-based stratification of global left ventricular myocardial infarct size.

Jonathan D Kochav1, Peter M Okin, Sean Wilson, Anika Afroz, Alfredo Renilla, Jonathan W Weinsaft.   

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) infarct size affects prognosis after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) provides accurate infarct quantification but is unavailable or contraindicated in many patients. This study tested whether simple electrocardiography (ECG) parameters can stratify LV infarct size. One hundred fifty-two patients with AMI underwent DE-CMR and serial 12-lead ECG. Electrocardiograms were quantitatively analyzed for multiple aspects of Q-wave morphology, including duration, amplitude, and geometric area (QWAr) summed across all leads except aVR. Patients with pathologic Q waves had larger infarcts measured by DE-CMR or enzymes (both p <0.001), even after controlling for infarct distribution by CMR or x-ray angiography. Comparison between early (4 ± 0.4 days after AMI) and follow-up (29 ± 6 days) ECG demonstrated temporal reductions in Q-wave amplitude (1.8 ± 1.4 vs 1.6 ± 1.6 mV; p = 0.03) but not QWAr (41 ± 38 vs 39 ± 43 mV•ms; p = 0.29). At both times, QWAr augmented stepwise with DE-CMR quantified infarct size (p <0.001). QWAr increased markedly at 10% LV infarct threshold, with differences more than threefold on early ECG (59 ± 39 vs 18 ± 20 mV•ms; p <0.001) and nearly fivefold (59 ± 46 vs 13 ± 16 mV•ms; p <0.001) on follow-up. Diagnostic performance compared with a 10% infarction cutoff was good on early (area under the curve = 0.84) and follow-up (area under the curve = 0.87) ECG. Optimization of sensitivity (95% to 98%) enabled QWAr to exclude affected patients with 90% to 94% negative predictive value at each time point. In conclusion, LV infarct size is accompanied by stepwise increments in Q-wave morphology, with QWAr increased three- to fivefold at a threshold of 10% LV infarction. Stratification based on QWAr provides excellent negative predictive value for exclusion of large (≥10%) LV infarct burden.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23611753      PMCID: PMC3878979          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  26 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing.

Authors:  D S Fieno; R J Kim; E L Chen; J W Lomasney; F J Klocke; R M Judd
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Development of an automated Selvester Scoring System for estimating the size of myocardial infarction from the electrocardiogram.

Authors:  B Milan Horácek; James W Warren; Alfred Albano; Michael A Palmeri; Judith C Rembert; Joseph C Greenfield; Galen S Wagner
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.438

3.  Size and transmural extent of first-time reperfused myocardial infarction assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance can be estimated by 12-lead electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Henrik Engblom; Erik Hedström; Einar Heiberg; Galen S Wagner; Olle Pahlm; Håkan Arheden
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Validation of three myocardial jeopardy scores in a population-based cardiac catheterization cohort.

Authors:  M M Graham; P D Faris; W A Ghali; P D Galbraith; C M Norris; J T Badry; L B Mitchell; M J Curtis; M L Knudtson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.

Authors:  R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Which parameters on magnetic resonance imaging determine Q waves on the electrocardiogram?

Authors:  Theodorus A M Kaandorp; Jeroen J Bax; Hildo J Lamb; Eric P Viergever; Eric Boersma; Don Poldermans; Ernst E van der Wall; Albert de Roos
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Accurate and objective infarct sizing by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a canine myocardial infarction model.

Authors:  Luciano C Amado; Bernhard L Gerber; Sandeep N Gupta; Dan W Rettmann; Gilberto Szarf; Robert Schock; Khurram Nasir; Dara L Kraitchman; João A C Lima
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Effects of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction on early and late infarct size and left ventricular wall characteristics.

Authors:  Timo Baks; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Elena Biagini; Piotr Wielopolski; Nico R Mollet; Filippo Cademartiri; Willem J van der Giessen; Gabriel P Krestin; Patrick W Serruys; Dirk J Duncker; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  The pathologic basis of Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  James C C Moon; Diego Perez De Arenaza; Andrew G Elkington; Anil K Taneja; Anna S John; Duolao Wang; Rajesh Janardhanan; Roxy Senior; Avijit Lahiri; Philip A Poole-Wilson; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  6 in total

1.  Q Wave in the Inferior Leads: There Is More Than Scar.

Authors:  Harilaos Bogossian; Ilias Ninios; Gerrit Frommeyer; Dejan Mijic; Fuad Hasan; Dirk Bandorski; Lars Eckardt; Bernd Lemke; Markus Zarse
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Echocardiography-quantified myocardial strain-a marker of global and regional infarct size that stratifies likelihood of left ventricular thrombus.

Authors:  Jiwon Kim; Sara Rodriguez-Diego; Aparna Srinivasan; Rachel-Maria Brown; Meridith P Pollie; Antonino Di Franco; Samantha R Goldburg; Jonathan Y Siden; Mark B Ratcliffe; Robert A Levine; Richard B Devereux; Jonathan W Weinsaft
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 1.724

3.  Q wave area for stratification of global left ventricular infarct size: comparison to conventional ECG assessment using Selvester QRS-score.

Authors:  Jonathan W Weinsaft; Jonathan D Kochav; Anika Afroz; Peter M Okin
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.439

4.  P wave area for quantitative electrocardiographic assessment of left atrial remodeling.

Authors:  Jonathan W Weinsaft; Jonathan D Kochav; Jiwon Kim; Sergey Gurevich; Samuel C Volo; Anika Afroz; Maya Petashnick; Agnes Kim; Richard B Devereux; Peter M Okin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Morroniside on anti-inflammation activities in rats following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Bangxing Yu; Guoxing Zhang; Yi An; Wen Wang
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.016

6.  Prediction of nonviable myocardium by ECG Q-Wave parameters: A 3.0 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Pathompong Kumpamool; Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul; Aisawan Petchlorlian; Nonthikorn Theerasuwipakorn; Yongkasem Vorasettakarnkij; Monravee Tumkosit; Pattarapong Makarawate; Smonporn Boonyaratavej; Pairoj Chattranukulchai
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2022-02-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.