Jonathan W Weinsaft1, Jonathan D Kochav, Anika Afroz, Peter M Okin. 1. aDepartment of Medicine, Greenberg Cardiology Division, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York bDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular (LV) infarct size is a prognostic determinant after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). ECG data have been used to measure infarct size, but conventional approaches use multiparametric algorithms that have limited clinical applicability. This study tested a novel ECG approach - based solely on Q wave area - for calculation of LV infarct size. METHODS: Serial 12-lead ECGs were performed in AMI patients. Computerized software was used to quantify Q wave area (summed across surface ECG leads) and Selvester QRS-score components. ECG analysis was compared to the reference of myocardial infarct size quantified by delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance. RESULTS: Overall, 158 patients underwent ECG during early (4±0.4) and follow-up (29±5 days) post-AMI time points. Selvester QRS-score and Q wave area increased stepwise with LV infarct size (P<0.001). Whereas both methods manifested marked increases at a threshold of 10% LV infarction, magnitude was greater for Q wave area (>2.5-fold) than Selvester QRS-score (<two-fold). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, Q wave area (area under the curve=0.83-0.86) and Selvester QRS-score (0.82-0.87) manifested similar performance in relation to a 10% infarct cutoff. When Selvester QRS-score and Q wave area thresholds were selected to optimize sensitivity, both methods yielded similar negative predictive value (Q wave area: 89-91%, Selvester QRS-score: 92-94%) although specificity was higher for Q wave area (44-45 vs. 17-25%; P≤0.01). CONCLUSION: Q wave area provides an index for stratification of LV infarct size that performs similarly to conventional ECG assessment via the Selvester QRS-score for exclusion of large infarction.
OBJECTIVES:Left ventricular (LV) infarct size is a prognostic determinant after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). ECG data have been used to measure infarct size, but conventional approaches use multiparametric algorithms that have limited clinical applicability. This study tested a novel ECG approach - based solely on Q wave area - for calculation of LV infarct size. METHODS: Serial 12-lead ECGs were performed in AMI patients. Computerized software was used to quantify Q wave area (summed across surface ECG leads) and Selvester QRS-score components. ECG analysis was compared to the reference of myocardial infarct size quantified by delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance. RESULTS: Overall, 158 patients underwent ECG during early (4±0.4) and follow-up (29±5 days) post-AMI time points. Selvester QRS-score and Q wave area increased stepwise with LV infarct size (P<0.001). Whereas both methods manifested marked increases at a threshold of 10% LV infarction, magnitude was greater for Q wave area (>2.5-fold) than Selvester QRS-score (<two-fold). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, Q wave area (area under the curve=0.83-0.86) and Selvester QRS-score (0.82-0.87) manifested similar performance in relation to a 10% infarct cutoff. When Selvester QRS-score and Q wave area thresholds were selected to optimize sensitivity, both methods yielded similar negative predictive value (Q wave area: 89-91%, Selvester QRS-score: 92-94%) although specificity was higher for Q wave area (44-45 vs. 17-25%; P≤0.01). CONCLUSION: Q wave area provides an index for stratification of LV infarct size that performs similarly to conventional ECG assessment via the Selvester QRS-score for exclusion of large infarction.
Authors: B Milan Horácek; James W Warren; Alfred Albano; Michael A Palmeri; Judith C Rembert; Joseph C Greenfield; Galen S Wagner Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2005-11-16 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Henrik Engblom; Erik Hedström; Einar Heiberg; Galen S Wagner; Olle Pahlm; Håkan Arheden Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Theodorus A M Kaandorp; Jeroen J Bax; Hildo J Lamb; Eric P Viergever; Eric Boersma; Don Poldermans; Ernst E van der Wall; Albert de Roos Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2005-04-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Lia E Bang; Rasmus S Ripa; Peer Grande; Jens Kastrup; Peter M Clemmensen; Galen S Wagner Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2008-09-14 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Annika E Welinder; Galen S Wagner; B Milan Horácek; Thomas N Martin; Charles Maynard; Olle Pahlm Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2008-12-18 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Daniël A Geerse; Katherine C Wu; Anton P Gorgels; Jeffrey Zimmet; Galen S Wagner; Julie M Miller Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Walther C M Rovers; Marit C van Boreen; Madeleine Robinson; Thomas N Martin; Charles Maynard; Galen S Wagner; Anton P M Gorgels Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Patrick Badertscher; Ivo Strebel; Ursina Honegger; Nicolas Schaerli; Deborah Mueller; Christian Puelacher; Max Wagener; Roger Abächerli; Joan Walter; Zaid Sabti; Lorraine Sazgary; Stella Marbot; Jeanne du Fay de Lavallaz; Raphael Twerenbold; Jasper Boeddinghaus; Thomas Nestelberger; Nikola Kozhuharov; Tobias Breidthardt; Samyut Shrestha; Dayana Flores; Carmela Schumacher; Damian Wild; Stefan Osswald; Michael J Zellweger; Christian Mueller; Tobias Reichlin Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 5.460