Literature DB >> 15820156

Which parameters on magnetic resonance imaging determine Q waves on the electrocardiogram?

Theodorus A M Kaandorp1, Jeroen J Bax, Hildo J Lamb, Eric P Viergever, Eric Boersma, Don Poldermans, Ernst E van der Wall, Albert de Roos.   

Abstract

Studies have demonstrated that patients with Q-wave infarctions on the electrocardiogram (ECG) frequently have nontransmural scar formation, whereas non-Q-wave infarctions may have transmural scars. The precise pathophysiologic substrate that underlies Q waves remains unclear. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred technique to evaluate patients who have infarction because information can be obtained on function, contractile reserve (viability), and scar tissue. Consecutive patients (n = 69) who had coronary artery disease and a history of myocardial infarction underwent MRI; the protocol included MRI at rest, small-dose dobutamine MRI, and contrast-enhanced MRI. Parameters included left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular volumes, end-diastolic wall thickness and contractile reserve in the infarct region, transmurality and spatial extent of scar tissue, total scar score, and quantified percent left ventricular scar tissue. MRI data were related to the presence/absence of Q waves on the ECG. Q waves were present in 39 patients (57%). Univariate analysis identified transmurality, spatial extent, total scar score, and quantified percent scar tissue as predictors of Q waves. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that quantified percent scar tissue was the single best predictor of Q waves on the ECG. A cut-off value of 17% infarcted tissue of the left ventricle yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 90% to predict the presence/absence of Q waves. When quantified percent scar tissue was removed from the model, spatial extent of infarction was the best predictor. Thus, Q waves on the ECG correlate best with quantified percent scar tissue on contrast-enhanced MR images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15820156     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Can we still rely on the ECG for detecting past myocardial injury?

Authors:  Gautam G Lalani; Andrew M Kahn; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-02-20

2.  Prevalence and Correlates of Ischemic ECG Findings among Adults With and Without HIV in Tanzania.

Authors:  Sainikitha Prattipati; Francis M Sakita; Tumsifu G Tarimo; Godfrey L Kweka; Jerome J Mlangi; Amedeus V Maro; Lauren A Coaxum; Sophie W Galson; Alexander T Limkakeng; Anzibert Rugakingira; Sarah J Urasa; Nwora L Okeke; Blandina T Mmbaga; Gerald S Bloomfield; Julian T Hertz
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  Usefulness of Q-wave area for threshold-based stratification of global left ventricular myocardial infarct size.

Authors:  Jonathan D Kochav; Peter M Okin; Sean Wilson; Anika Afroz; Alfredo Renilla; Jonathan W Weinsaft
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Mitigation of myocardial fibrosis by molecular cardiac surgery-mediated gene overexpression.

Authors:  Michael G Katz; Elizabeth Brandon-Warner; Anthony S Fargnoli; Richard D Williams; Andrew P Kendle; Roger J Hajjar; Laura W Schrum; Charles R Bridges
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Q wave area for stratification of global left ventricular infarct size: comparison to conventional ECG assessment using Selvester QRS-score.

Authors:  Jonathan W Weinsaft; Jonathan D Kochav; Anika Afroz; Peter M Okin
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.439

6.  Validation of black blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) for evaluation of myocardial infarction in patients with or without pathological Q-wave on electrocardiogram (ECG).

Authors:  Linsheng Song; Xiaohai Ma; Xinxiang Zhao; Lei Zhao; Mark DeLano; Yang Fan; Bin Wu; Aijia Lu; Jie Tian; Liping He
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-04

7.  Prognostic value of electrocardiographic detection of unrecognized myocardial infarction in persons with stable coronary artery disease: data from the Heart and Soul Study.

Authors:  Devin W Kehl; Ramin Farzaneh-Far; Beeya Na; Mary A Whooley
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 8.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in ischemic heart disease: a clinical review.

Authors:  A Florian; R Jurcut; C Ginghina; J Bogaert
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2011-11-24

9.  Prediction of nonviable myocardium by ECG Q-Wave parameters: A 3.0 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Pathompong Kumpamool; Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul; Aisawan Petchlorlian; Nonthikorn Theerasuwipakorn; Yongkasem Vorasettakarnkij; Monravee Tumkosit; Pattarapong Makarawate; Smonporn Boonyaratavej; Pairoj Chattranukulchai
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2022-02-09

10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of scar and ischemia burden early after acute ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Sven Plein; John F Younger; Patrick Sparrow; John P Ridgway; Stephen G Ball; John P Greenwood
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.