OBJECTIVES: To identify an accurate and reproducible method to define myocardial infarct (MI) size, we conducted a study in a closed-chest canine model of acute myocardial infarction, in which MI size was measured using different thresholding techniques and by imaging at different delay times after contrast administration. BACKGROUND: The MI size by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) is directly related to long-term prognosis. However, previous measurements were done using nonuniform methods and tended to overestimate nonviable areas. METHODS: Thirteen animals underwent 90 min of coronary artery occlusion, followed by reperfusion. The CE-MRI data were acquired within 24 h after reperfusion and compared with triphenyltetrazolium chloride pathology. In the first nine animals, images were obtained approximately 15 min after gadolinium diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA) using an inversion-recovery gradient-echo pulse sequence. To identify the most accurate method, MI size by CE-MRI was measured visually and by semi-automatic thresholding techniques, using different criteria. In four additional animals, images were acquired every 6 min until 30 min after Gd-DTPA. RESULTS: Postmortem MI size was 13.5 +/- 2.6% of left ventricular volume. Semi-automatic techniques, using full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) criterion, correlated best with postmortem data (r(2) = 0.94, p < 0.001; results confirmed by Bland-Altman plots). Using FWHM, there was no difference in MI size between different delay times after contrast (15.2 +/- 2.9% to 14.5 +/- 4.2% at 6 and 30 min, respectively; p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: When an objective technique is used to define MI size by CE-MRI, accurate infarct size measurements can be obtained from images obtained up to 30 min after contrast administration.
OBJECTIVES: To identify an accurate and reproducible method to define myocardial infarct (MI) size, we conducted a study in a closed-chest canine model of acute myocardial infarction, in which MI size was measured using different thresholding techniques and by imaging at different delay times after contrast administration. BACKGROUND: The MI size by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) is directly related to long-term prognosis. However, previous measurements were done using nonuniform methods and tended to overestimate nonviable areas. METHODS: Thirteen animals underwent 90 min of coronary artery occlusion, followed by reperfusion. The CE-MRI data were acquired within 24 h after reperfusion and compared with triphenyltetrazolium chloride pathology. In the first nine animals, images were obtained approximately 15 min after gadolinium diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA) using an inversion-recovery gradient-echo pulse sequence. To identify the most accurate method, MI size by CE-MRI was measured visually and by semi-automatic thresholding techniques, using different criteria. In four additional animals, images were acquired every 6 min until 30 min after Gd-DTPA. RESULTS: Postmortem MI size was 13.5 +/- 2.6% of left ventricular volume. Semi-automatic techniques, using full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) criterion, correlated best with postmortem data (r(2) = 0.94, p < 0.001; results confirmed by Bland-Altman plots). Using FWHM, there was no difference in MI size between different delay times after contrast (15.2 +/- 2.9% to 14.5 +/- 4.2% at 6 and 30 min, respectively; p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: When an objective technique is used to define MI size by CE-MRI, accurate infarct size measurements can be obtained from images obtained up to 30 min after contrast administration.
Authors: Ronald J Beyers; R Scott Smith; Yaqin Xu; Bryan A Piras; Michael Salerno; Stuart S Berr; Craig H Meyer; Christopher M Kramer; Brent A French; Frederick H Epstein Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jose C Quinaglia e Silva; Otavio Rizzi Coelho-Filho; Joalbo M Andrade; Thiago Quinaglia; Rodrigo G P Modolo; Breno O Almeida; Rob J van der Geest; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Otavio Rizzi Coelho; Andrei C Sposito Journal: Inflammation Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.092
Authors: Daniel R Ludwig; Mati Friehling; Erik B Schelbert; David Schwartzman Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-11-09 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Karl H Schuleri; Andrew J Boyle; Marco Centola; Luciano C Amado; Robert Evers; Jeffrey M Zimmet; Kristine S Evers; Katherine M Ostbye; Diana G Scorpio; Joshua M Hare; Albert C Lardo Journal: Comp Med Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 0.982