Literature DB >> 23610049

Practices and policies of clinical exome sequencing providers: analysis and implications.

Seema M Jamal1, Joon-Ho Yu, Jessica X Chong, Karin M Dent, Jessie H Conta, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad.   

Abstract

Exome and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) offer potential advantages over traditional approaches to diagnostic genetic testing. Consequently, use of ES/WGS in clinical settings is rapidly becoming commonplace. Yet there are myriad moral, ethical, and perhaps legal implications attached to the use of ES and health care professionals and institutions will need to consider these implications in the context of the varied practices and policies of ES service providers. We developed "core elements" of content and procedures for informed consent, data sharing, and results management and a quantitative scale to assess the extent to which research protocols met the standards established by these core elements. We then used these tools to evaluate the practices and policies of each of the 6 U.S. CLIA-certified labs offering clinical ES. Approaches toward informed consent, data sharing, and results return vary widely among ES providers as do the overall potential merits and disadvantages of each, and more importantly, the balance between the two.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23610049      PMCID: PMC3708985          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  20 in total

1.  The tricky matter of secondary genomic findings: ACMG plans to issue recommendations.

Authors:  Deborah Levenson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 2.  Whole exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  David Bick; David Dimmock
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.856

3.  Whole-genome sequencing for optimized patient management.

Authors:  Matthew N Bainbridge; Wojciech Wiszniewski; David R Murdock; Jennifer Friedman; Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui; Irene Newsham; Jeffrey G Reid; John K Fink; Margaret B Morgan; Marie-Claude Gingras; Donna M Muzny; Linh D Hoang; Shahed Yousaf; James R Lupski; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  The Centers for Mendelian Genomics: a new large-scale initiative to identify the genes underlying rare Mendelian conditions.

Authors:  Michael J Bamshad; Jay A Shendure; David Valle; Ada Hamosh; James R Lupski; Richard A Gibbs; Eric Boerwinkle; Richard P Lifton; Mark Gerstein; Murat Gunel; Shrikant Mane; Deborah A Nickerson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: genome research participants' perspectives.

Authors:  J M Oliver; M J Slashinski; T Wang; P A Kelly; S G Hilsenbeck; A L McGuire
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Genomics really gets personal: how exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research.

Authors:  Holly K Tabor; Benjamin E Berkman; Sara Chandros Hull; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Evolution and functional impact of rare coding variation from deep sequencing of human exomes.

Authors:  Jacob A Tennessen; Abigail W Bigham; Timothy D O'Connor; Wenqing Fu; Eimear E Kenny; Simon Gravel; Sean McGee; Ron Do; Xiaoming Liu; Goo Jun; Hyun Min Kang; Daniel Jordan; Suzanne M Leal; Stacey Gabriel; Mark J Rieder; Goncalo Abecasis; David Altshuler; Deborah A Nickerson; Eric Boerwinkle; Shamil Sunyaev; Carlos D Bustamante; Michael J Bamshad; Joshua M Akey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Downsizing genomic medicine: approaching the ethical complexity of whole-genome sequencing by starting small.

Authors:  Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Gerard T Berry; Leslie G Biesecker; David P Dimmock; James P Evans; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri R Hegde; Sarah Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Ian Krantz; Amy L McGuire; David T Miller; Michael F Murray; Robert L Nussbaum; Sharon E Plon; Heidi L Rehm; Howard J Jacob
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Making a definitive diagnosis: successful clinical application of whole exome sequencing in a child with intractable inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Worthey; Alan N Mayer; Grant D Syverson; Daniel Helbling; Benedetta B Bonacci; Brennan Decker; Jaime M Serpe; Trivikram Dasu; Michael R Tschannen; Regan L Veith; Monica J Basehore; Ulrich Broeckel; Aoy Tomita-Mitchell; Marjorie J Arca; James T Casper; David A Margolis; David P Bick; Martin J Hessner; John M Routes; James W Verbsky; Howard J Jacob; David P Dimmock
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Massively parallel sequencing: the new frontier of hematologic genomics.

Authors:  Jill M Johnsen; Deborah A Nickerson; Alex P Reiner
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  A genetic counselor's guide to using next-generation sequencing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Flavia M Facio; Kristy Lee; Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Compare and contrast: a cross-national study across UK, USA and Greek experts regarding return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.

Authors:  Elli G Gourna; Natalie Armstrong; Susan E Wallace
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Identifying and Classifying Tools for Health Policy Ethics Review: A Systematic Search and Review.

Authors:  Mary Henein; Carolyn Ells
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2021-01-01

5.  My Identical Twin Sequenced our Genome.

Authors:  Samantha L P Schilit; Arielle Schilit Nitenson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Analysis of VUS reporting, variant reinterpretation and recontact policies in clinical genomic sequencing consent forms.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Emilia Niemiec; Heidi Carmen Howard; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 7.  Whole exome sequencing: a state-of-the-art approach for defining (and exploring!) genetic landscapes in pediatric nephrology.

Authors:  Ashima Gulati; Stefan Somlo
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Julia Crouch; Seema M Jamal; Michael J Bamshad; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Informed consent for exome sequencing research in families with genetic disease: the emerging issue of incidental findings.

Authors:  Amanda L Bergner; Juli Bollinger; Karen S Raraigh; Crystal Tichnell; Brittney Murray; Carrie Lynn Blout; Aida Bytyci Telegrafi; Cynthia A James
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 10.  A review of consent practices and perspectives for pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.