Literature DB >> 33386534

Identifying and Classifying Tools for Health Policy Ethics Review: A Systematic Search and Review.

Mary Henein1, Carolyn Ells2,3,4.   

Abstract

Ethical review and analysis of health policy may help to ensure policies address the needs of society and align with relevant values and principles. Indeed, researchers and bioethicists have recognized the need for ethical frameworks specifically for public health applications. The objective of this research was to compile structured tools for ethical review of (drafted or existing) health policy and to analyze these tools for their scope and philosophical underpinnings. A systematic search and review of academic and grey literature was conducted to compile existing tools designed for health policy ethics review. The search yielded 13 health policy ethical review tools. Qualitative content analysis revealed that all of the tools were influenced by multiple ethical values and that a majority were influenced by more than one ethical theory. The most common values were non-maleficence and beneficence (92.3%). The most common influencing ethical theory was the Principles Approach (92.3%). The structure of the tools demonstrates a heterogeneity of methodology designs to approach policy ethics review. This research offers a unique contribution to the bioethics field that provides a useful resource and understanding of the current ethical review tools for health policy.

Keywords:  Ethical review; Healthcare policy ethics; Public health ethics framework

Year:  2021        PMID: 33386534     DOI: 10.1007/s10728-020-00422-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  12 in total

Review 1.  Benchmarks of fairness for health care reform: a policy tool for developing countries.

Authors:  N Daniels; J Bryant; R A Castano; O G Dantes; K S Khan; S Pannarunothai
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Health policy analysis: a tool to evaluate in policy documents the alignment between policy statements and intended outcomes.

Authors:  K Katherine Cheung; Masoud Mirzaei; Stephen Leeder
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

4.  Wanted: a new ethics field for health policy analysis.

Authors:  Nuala Kenny; Mita Giacomini
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2005-12

5.  Public health ethics. Public justification and public trust.

Authors:  J F Childress; R Gaare Bernheim
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Including organizational ethics in policy review processes in healthcare institutions: a view from Canada.

Authors:  Fiona McDonald; Christy Simpson; Fran O'Brien
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2008-06

7.  Ethics frameworks in Canadian health policies: foundation, scaffolding, or window dressing?

Authors:  Mita Giacomini; Nuala Kenny; Deirdre DeJean
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Ethics policy review: a case study in quality improvement.

Authors:  Andrea Nadine Frolic; Katherine Drolet
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Practices and policies of clinical exome sequencing providers: analysis and implications.

Authors:  Seema M Jamal; Joon-Ho Yu; Jessica X Chong; Karin M Dent; Jessie H Conta; Holly K Tabor; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Bioethics as a Governance Practice.

Authors:  Jonathan Montgomery
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2016-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.