Literature DB >> 23606134

The bilingual L2 advantage in recognition memory.

Wendy S Francis1, E Natalia Strobach.   

Abstract

To better understand the mechanisms by which bilingual proficiency impacts memory processes, two recognition memory experiments were conducted with matched monolingual and bilingual samples. In Experiment 1, monolingual speakers of English and Spanish studied high- and low-frequency words under full attention or cognitive load conditions. In Experiment 2, Spanish-English bilingual participants studied high- and low-frequency words under full-attention conditions in each language. For both monolinguals and bilinguals, low-frequency words were better recognized than high-frequency words. The central new findings were that bilingual recognition was more accurate in the less fluent language (L2) than in the more fluent language (L1) and that bilingual L2 recognition was more accurate than monolingual recognition. The bilingual L2 advantage parallels word frequency effects in recognition and is attributed to the greater episodic distinctiveness of L2 words, relative to L1 words.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23606134     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0427-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory.

Authors:  J L Hicks; R L Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The effect of divided attention on memory for items and their context.

Authors:  A K Troyer; F I Craik
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2000-09

3.  Bilingual recognition memory: stronger performance but weaker levels-of-processing effects in the less fluent language.

Authors:  Wendy S Francis; Marisela Gutiérrez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

4.  More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis.

Authors:  Tamar H Gollan; Rosa I Montoya; Cynthia Cera; Tiffany C Sandoval
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: the resiliency of retrieval processes.

Authors:  M Naveh-Benjamin; F I Craik; J G Perretta; S T Tonev
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-08

6.  Word frequency effects on recall, recognition, and word fragment completion tests.

Authors:  C M MacLeod; K E Kampe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: further support for an asymmetry.

Authors:  M Naveh-Benjamin; F I Craik; J Guez; H Dori
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The word-frequency paradox in recognition.

Authors:  G Mandler; G O Goodman; D L Wilkes-Gibbs
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-01

10.  Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: the frequency-lag hypothesis.

Authors:  Tamar H Gollan; Timothy J Slattery; Diane Goldenberg; Eva Van Assche; Wouter Duyck; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-05
View more
  7 in total

1.  Word-context associations in episodic memory are learned at the conceptual level: Word frequency, bilingual proficiency, and bilingual status effects on source memory.

Authors:  Wendy S Francis; E Natalia Strobach; Renee M Penalver; Michelle Martínez; Bianca V Gurrola; Amaris Soltero
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The effect of language proficiency and associative strength on false memory.

Authors:  Maria Soledad Beato; Jason Arndt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-02

3.  Temporal dynamics of free recall: The role of rehearsal efficiency in word frequency and bilingual language proficiency effects.

Authors:  Wendy S Francis; Marcela M Arteaga; Mary K Liaño; Randolph S Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-01-09

4.  The effects of bilingual language proficiency on recall accuracy and semantic clustering in free recall output: evidence for shared semantic associations across languages.

Authors:  Wendy S Francis; Randolph S Taylor; Marisela Gutiérrez; Mary K Liaño; Diana G Manzanera; Renee M Penalver
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2018-05-19

5.  Effects of Bilingualism on Verbal and Nonverbal Memory Measures in Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Mónica Rosselli; David A Loewenstein; Rosie E Curiel; Ailyn Penate; Valeria L Torres; Merike Lang; Maria T Greig; William W Barker; Ranjan Duara
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  Order effects in bilingual recognition memory partially confirm predictions of the frequency-lag hypothesis.

Authors:  Reina Mizrahi; John T Wixted; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2021-03-30

7.  Fuzzy Lexical Representations in Adult Second Language Speakers.

Authors:  Kira Gor; Svetlana Cook; Denisa Bordag; Anna Chrabaszcz; Andreas Opitz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-11-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.