Literature DB >> 11185778

Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory.

J L Hicks1, R L Marsh.   

Abstract

Previous studies have concluded that recognition memory is immune to disruption from divided attention and therefore is a relatively automatic process (A. Baddeley, V. Lewis, M. Eldridge, & N. Thomson, 1984; F. I. M. Craik, R. Govoni, M. Naveh-Benjamin, & N. D. Anderson, 1996). Because costs have been found on the concurrent task used to divide attention, recognition may nevertheless require some attentional resources (M. Naveh-Benjamin, F. I. M. Craik, J. Guez, & H. Dori, 1998). The present authors used attention-demanding concurrent tasks to demonstrate significant costs on both the concurrent task and recognition memory performance. Decrements in recognition accuracy were found for classes of items that were studied deeply but not for more shallowly learned materials. The present findings suggest that recognition processes can require significant attentional resources when tested under the appropriate conditions. The results are discussed in terms of the requirements both at encoding and at test that are needed to observe dual-task decrements to recognition accuracy.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11185778     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  26 in total

1.  Divided attention and prerecognition processing of spoken words and nonwords.

Authors:  W P Wallace; T R Shaffer; M D Amberg; V L Silvers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-12

2.  The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Thomas W Hancock; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

3.  "Nonparametric" A' and other modern misconceptions about signal detection theory.

Authors:  Richard E Pastore; Edward J Crawley; Melody S Berens; Michael A Skelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

4.  Bilingual recognition memory: stronger performance but weaker levels-of-processing effects in the less fluent language.

Authors:  Wendy S Francis; Marisela Gutiérrez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

5.  An imperfect relationship between prospective memory and the prospective interference effect.

Authors:  M Windy McNerney; Robert West
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

6.  The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: a comparison of DRM and categorized lists.

Authors:  Lauren M Knott; Stephen A Dewhurst
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

7.  Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.

Authors:  Jennifer C Weeks; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

8.  How Does the Linguistic Distance Between Spoken and Standard Language in Arabic Affect Recall and Recognition Performances During Verbal Memory Examination.

Authors:  Haitham Taha
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-06

9.  The bilingual L2 advantage in recognition memory.

Authors:  Wendy S Francis; E Natalia Strobach
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

10.  The interplay between inhibitory control and metaphor conventionality.

Authors:  Faria Sana; Juana Park; Christina L Gagné; Thomas L Spalding
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.