Literature DB >> 23606054

Simultaneous imaging of in vivo conductivity and susceptibility.

Dong-Hyun Kim1, Narae Choi, Sung-Min Gho, Jaewook Shin, Chunlei Liu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Approaches for quantitative mapping of electric conductivity and magnetic susceptibility using MRI have been developed independently. The purpose of this study is to present a method to simultaneously acquire information on conductivity and susceptibility and to produce images based on these properties.
METHODS: A 3D multiecho gradient-echo sequence was used. Phase evolution during the multiecho was used to produce quantitative susceptibility maps, while the phase value at zero echo time was retrieved, and used to generates quantitative conductivity maps. Electromagnetic simulations were performed to evaluate the phase distribution due to conductivity variations. Phantom and in vivo data were also acquired to assess the quality of images produced.
RESULTS: Simulations demonstrated that phase differences across objects increases with size and conductivity. For an accurate conductivity estimate, the maximum echo time was approximately equal to the true T2* value in order to achieve signal-to-noise ratio maximization. The most accurate susceptibility was obtained when separating phase contribution from conductivity. Phantom and in vivo results showed good quality images representing the electromagnetic properties.
CONCLUSION: A simultaneous quantitative electromagnetic property imaging approach is demonstrated here. The approach not only improves the efficiency of mapping electromagnetic properties, but can also improve the accuracy of susceptibility mapping by separating image phases introduced by conductivity and susceptibility.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23606054      PMCID: PMC3883903          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  33 in total

1.  Error analysis of nonconstant admittivity for MR-based electric property imaging.

Authors:  Jin Keun Seo; Min-Oh Kim; Joonsung Lee; Narae Choi; Eung Je Woo; Hyung Joong Kim; Oh In Kwon; Dong-Hyun Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Vivek Sehgal; Zachary Delproposto; E Mark Haacke; Karen A Tong; Nathaniel Wycliffe; Daniel K Kido; Yingbiao Xu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Djamel Haddar; Jürgen R Reichenbach
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Actual flip-angle imaging in the pulsed steady state: a method for rapid three-dimensional mapping of the transmitted radiofrequency field.

Authors:  Vasily L Yarnykh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  The electrical impedance of pulsatile blood flowing through rigid tubes: a theoretical investigation.

Authors:  R L Gaw; B H Cornish; B J Thomas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI.

Authors:  Tian Liu; Pascal Spincemaille; Ludovic de Rochefort; Bryan Kressler; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Reduction of susceptibility-induced signal losses in multi-gradient-echo images: application to improved visualization of the subthalamic nucleus.

Authors:  Steffen Volz; Elke Hattingen; Christine Preibisch; Thomas Gasser; Ralf Deichmann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.

Authors:  Eung Je Woo; Jin Keun Seo
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 2.833

8.  Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field.

Authors:  Ludovic de Rochefort; Ryan Brown; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Berkin Bilgic; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Torsten Rohlfing; Edith V Sullivan; Elfar Adalsteinsson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  B1(+) phase mapping at 7 T and its application for in vivo electrical conductivity mapping.

Authors:  Astrid L H M W van Lier; David O Brunner; Klaas P Pruessmann; Dennis W J Klomp; Peter R Luijten; Jan J W Lagendijk; Cornelis A T van den Berg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  An illustrated comparison of processing methods for phase MRI and QSM: removal of background field contributions from sources outside the region of interest.

Authors:  Ferdinand Schweser; Simon Daniel Robinson; Ludovic de Rochefort; Wei Li; Kristian Bredies
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Saifeng Liu; Sagar Buch; Yongsheng Chen; Hyun-Seok Choi; Yongming Dai; Charbel Habib; Jiani Hu; Joon-Yong Jung; Yu Luo; David Utriainen; Meiyun Wang; Dongmei Wu; Shuang Xia; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Image Guided Radiation Therapy Using Synthetic Computed Tomography Images in Brain Cancer.

Authors:  Ryan G Price; Joshua P Kim; Weili Zheng; Indrin J Chetty; Carri Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Combining phase images from array coils using a short echo time reference scan (COMPOSER).

Authors:  Simon Daniel Robinson; Barbara Dymerska; Wolfgang Bogner; Markus Barth; Olgica Zaric; Sigrun Goluch; Günther Grabner; Xeni Deligianni; Oliver Bieri; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Variation in Reported Human Head Tissue Electrical Conductivity Values.

Authors:  Hannah McCann; Giampaolo Pisano; Leandro Beltrachini
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Numerical Experiments on the Contrast Capability of Magnetic Resonance Electrical Property Tomography.

Authors:  Song Duan; Yurong Zhu; Feng Liu; Sherman Xuegang Xin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Transceive phase mapping using the PLANET method and its application for conductivity mapping in the brain.

Authors:  Soraya Gavazzi; Yulia Shcherbakova; Lambertus W Bartels; Lukas J A Stalpers; Jan J W Lagendijk; Hans Crezee; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Astrid L H M W van Lier
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  An illustrated comparison of processing methods for MR phase imaging and QSM: combining array coil signals and phase unwrapping.

Authors:  Simon Daniel Robinson; Kristian Bredies; Diana Khabipova; Barbara Dymerska; José P Marques; Ferdinand Schweser
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  An MR technique for simultaneous quantitative imaging of water content, conductivity and susceptibility, with application to brain tumours using a 3T hybrid MR-PET scanner.

Authors:  Yupeng Liao; Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens; Johannes Lindemeyer; Nazim Lechea; Carolin Weiß-Lucas; Karl-Josef Langen; N Jon Shah
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.