PURPOSE: Approaches for quantitative mapping of electric conductivity and magnetic susceptibility using MRI have been developed independently. The purpose of this study is to present a method to simultaneously acquire information on conductivity and susceptibility and to produce images based on these properties. METHODS: A 3D multiecho gradient-echo sequence was used. Phase evolution during the multiecho was used to produce quantitative susceptibility maps, while the phase value at zero echo time was retrieved, and used to generates quantitative conductivity maps. Electromagnetic simulations were performed to evaluate the phase distribution due to conductivity variations. Phantom and in vivo data were also acquired to assess the quality of images produced. RESULTS: Simulations demonstrated that phase differences across objects increases with size and conductivity. For an accurate conductivity estimate, the maximum echo time was approximately equal to the true T2* value in order to achieve signal-to-noise ratio maximization. The most accurate susceptibility was obtained when separating phase contribution from conductivity. Phantom and in vivo results showed good quality images representing the electromagnetic properties. CONCLUSION: A simultaneous quantitative electromagnetic property imaging approach is demonstrated here. The approach not only improves the efficiency of mapping electromagnetic properties, but can also improve the accuracy of susceptibility mapping by separating image phases introduced by conductivity and susceptibility.
PURPOSE: Approaches for quantitative mapping of electric conductivity and magnetic susceptibility using MRI have been developed independently. The purpose of this study is to present a method to simultaneously acquire information on conductivity and susceptibility and to produce images based on these properties. METHODS: A 3D multiecho gradient-echo sequence was used. Phase evolution during the multiecho was used to produce quantitative susceptibility maps, while the phase value at zero echo time was retrieved, and used to generates quantitative conductivity maps. Electromagnetic simulations were performed to evaluate the phase distribution due to conductivity variations. Phantom and in vivo data were also acquired to assess the quality of images produced. RESULTS: Simulations demonstrated that phase differences across objects increases with size and conductivity. For an accurate conductivity estimate, the maximum echo time was approximately equal to the true T2* value in order to achieve signal-to-noise ratio maximization. The most accurate susceptibility was obtained when separating phase contribution from conductivity. Phantom and in vivo results showed good quality images representing the electromagnetic properties. CONCLUSION: A simultaneous quantitative electromagnetic property imaging approach is demonstrated here. The approach not only improves the efficiency of mapping electromagnetic properties, but can also improve the accuracy of susceptibility mapping by separating image phases introduced by conductivity and susceptibility.
Authors: Vivek Sehgal; Zachary Delproposto; E Mark Haacke; Karen A Tong; Nathaniel Wycliffe; Daniel K Kido; Yingbiao Xu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Djamel Haddar; Jürgen R Reichenbach Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Astrid L H M W van Lier; David O Brunner; Klaas P Pruessmann; Dennis W J Klomp; Peter R Luijten; Jan J W Lagendijk; Cornelis A T van den Berg Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-06-27 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ferdinand Schweser; Simon Daniel Robinson; Ludovic de Rochefort; Wei Li; Kristian Bredies Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Simon Daniel Robinson; Barbara Dymerska; Wolfgang Bogner; Markus Barth; Olgica Zaric; Sigrun Goluch; Günther Grabner; Xeni Deligianni; Oliver Bieri; Siegfried Trattnig Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Soraya Gavazzi; Yulia Shcherbakova; Lambertus W Bartels; Lukas J A Stalpers; Jan J W Lagendijk; Hans Crezee; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Astrid L H M W van Lier Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Simon Daniel Robinson; Kristian Bredies; Diana Khabipova; Barbara Dymerska; José P Marques; Ferdinand Schweser Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Yupeng Liao; Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens; Johannes Lindemeyer; Nazim Lechea; Carolin Weiß-Lucas; Karl-Josef Langen; N Jon Shah Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 4.379