Literature DB >> 11170078

Consent to the use of stored DNA for genetics research: a survey of attitudes in the Jewish population.

M D Schwartz1, K Rothenberg, L Joseph, J Benkendorf, C Lerman.   

Abstract

The use of anonymized stored tissue is a routine practice in genetic research. Investigators who utilize stored samples are neither required nor able to obtain informed consent before each use. Many genetic studies, however, are conducted on specific ethnic populations (e.g., Ashkenazi Jews). The results in these cases, although individually anonymous, are not anonymous with respect to the ethnicity of the participants. This lack of group anonymity has led to concern about the possibility of stigmatization and discrimination based on the results of the genetic research. In the present study we surveyed Jewish individuals about their attitudes regarding the practice of using stored DNA samples for genetic research. Specifically, we were interested in whether attitudes about informed consent and willingness to participate in genetics research using stored DNA would depend on the circumstances in which the material was collected (i.e., clinical setting vs. research setting) and the characteristics of the disease or trait under investigation. Overall, most respondents reported that written informed consent should be required and that they would be willing to provide such consent. Participants were most willing to provide consent, however, when the sample had been collected in a research rather than clinical setting. Further, participants were more likely to endorse the need for obtaining consent when the sample was collected in a clinical setting. Finally, participants were significantly less willing to participate in research that examined stereotypical or potentially stigmatizing traits as opposed to research that examined medical or mental illnesses. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11170078     DOI: 10.1002/1096-8628(20010201)98:4<336::aid-ajmg1100>3.0.co;2-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  26 in total

1.  Biobank Recruitment: Motivations for Nonparticipation.

Authors:  Katrina A B Goddard; K Sabina Smith; Chuhe Chen; Carmit McMullen; Cheryl Johnson
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Considerations in the construction of an instrument to assess attitudes regarding critical illness gene variation research.

Authors:  Bradley D Freeman; Carie R Kennedy; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Alexander Eastman; Ellen Iverson; Erica Shehane; Aaron Celious; Jennifer Barillas; Brian Clarridge
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Blurring lines. The research activities of direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies raise questions about consumers as research subjects.

Authors:  Heidi C Howard; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Pascal Borry
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  The relevance of empirical research in bioethics.

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; David Wendler
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  Ashkenazi Jews and breast cancer: the consequences of linking ethnic identity to genetic disease.

Authors:  Sherry I Brandt-Rauf; Victoria H Raveis; Nathan F Drummond; Jill A Conte; Sheila M Rothman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Public willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rene Sterling; Gail E Henderson; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  One-time general consent for research on biological samples.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-04

8.  Ethical and practical challenges to studying patients who opt out of large-scale biorepository research.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Jennifer L Madison; Kyle B Brothers; Erica A Bowton; Ellen Wright Clayton; Bradley A Malin; Dan M Roden; Jill Pulley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Factors associated with willingness to participate in biospecimen research among Chinese Americans.

Authors:  Wanzhen Gao; Grace X Ma; Yin Tan; Carolyn Fang; JoEllen Weaver; Ming Jin; Philip Lai
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens: The Views of Actual Donors at Four U.S. Medical Centers.

Authors:  Teddy D Warner; Carol J Weil; Christopher Andry; Howard B Degenholtz; Lisa Parker; Latarsha J Carithers; Michelle Feige; David Wendler; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.