Literature DB >> 19006210

Community consultation and communication for a population-based DNA biobank: the Marshfield clinic personalized medicine research project.

Catherine A McCarty1, Donna Chapman-Stone, Teresa Derfus, Philip F Giampietro, Norman Fost.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to describe community consultation and communication efforts for the Personalized Medicine Research Project (PMRP), a population-based biobank. A series of focus group discussions was held in the year preceding initial recruitment efforts with potentially eligible community residents and slightly less than a year after initial recruitment with eligible residents who had declined participation in PMRP. A Community Advisory Group, with 19 members reflecting the demographics of the eligible community, was formed and meets twice yearly to provide advice and feedback to the PMRP Principal Investigator and the local IRB. Ongoing communication with study subjects, who consent on the condition that personal genetic results will not be disclosed, takes place through a newsletter that is distributed twice yearly, community talks and media coverage. Most focus group participants were concerned about the confidentiality of both their medical and genetic data. Focus group discussions with eligible residents who elected not to participate in PMRP revealed that many knew very little about the project, but thought that too much information had been provided, leading them to believe that it would take too long for them to understand and enroll in the study. In conclusion, an engaged community advisory group can provide a sounding board to study investigators for many study issues and can provide guidance for broader communication activities. Researchers need to balance the provision of information for potential subjects to make informed decisions about study participation, with respect for individuals' time to read and interpret study materials. Copyright (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19006210      PMCID: PMC2588646          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  10 in total

1.  What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation.

Authors:  N Dickert; C Grady
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Monitoring ethical, legal, and social issues in developing population genetic databases.

Authors:  Melissa A Austin; Sarah E Harding; Courtney E McElroy
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?

Authors:  Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Gather ye shibboleths while ye may.

Authors:  Norman Fost
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 6.  Public willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rene Sterling; Gail E Henderson; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Community engagement and informed consent in the International HapMap project.

Authors:  Charles Rotimi; Mark Leppert; Ichiro Matsuda; Changqing Zeng; Houcan Zhang; Clement Adebamowo; Ike Ajayi; Toyin Aniagwu; Missy Dixon; Yoshimitsu Fukushima; Darryl Macer; Patricia Marshall; Chibuzor Nkwodimmah; Andy Peiffer; Charmaine Royal; Eiko Suda; Hui Zhao; Vivian Ota Wang; Jean McEwen
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007

8.  Community engagement in genetic research: results of the first public consultation for the Quebec CARTaGENE project.

Authors:  Béatrice Godard; Jennifer Marshall; Claude Laberge
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007

9.  Payment of clinical research subjects.

Authors:  Christine Grady
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Informed consent and subject motivation to participate in a large, population-based genomics study: the Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project.

Authors:  Catherine A McCarty; Anuradha Nair; Diane M Austin; Philip F Giampietro
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007
  10 in total
  46 in total

Review 1.  Biobanks: importance, implications and opportunities for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Alice K Hawkins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Structuring public engagement for effective input in policy development on human tissue biobanking.

Authors:  Kieran C O'Doherty; A Hawkins
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Genetics and cardiovascular disease: a policy statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Euan A Ashley; Ray E Hershberger; Colleen Caleshu; Patrick T Ellinor; Joe G N Garcia; David M Herrington; Carolyn Y Ho; Julie A Johnson; Steven J Kittner; Calum A Macrae; Gia Mudd-Martin; Daniel J Rader; Dan M Roden; Derek Scholes; Frank W Sellke; Jeffrey A Towbin; Jennifer Van Eyk; Bradford B Worrall
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Research participation as work: comparing the perspectives of researchers and economically marginalized populations.

Authors:  Peter Davidson; Kimberly Page
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Application of clinical text data for phenome-wide association studies (PheWASs).

Authors:  Scott J Hebbring; Majid Rastegar-Mojarad; Zhan Ye; John Mayer; Crystal Jacobson; Simon Lin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  The role of nonverbal and verbal communication in a multimedia informed consent process.

Authors:  Joseph M Plasek; David S Pieczkiewicz; Andrea N Mahnke; Catherine A McCarty; Justin B Starren; Bonnie L Westra
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  'Cool! and creepy': engaging with college student stakeholders in Michigan's biobank.

Authors:  Tevah Platt; Jodyn Platt; Daniel B Thiel; Nicole Fisher; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-06-12

8.  Community engagement in US biobanking: multiplicity of meaning and method.

Authors:  K M Haldeman; R J Cadigan; A Davis; A Goldenberg; G E Henderson; D Lassiter; E Reavely
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Characterization of statin dose response in electronic medical records.

Authors:  W-Q Wei; Q Feng; L Jiang; M S Waitara; O F Iwuchukwu; D M Roden; M Jiang; H Xu; R M Krauss; J I Rotter; D A Nickerson; R L Davis; R L Berg; P L Peissig; C A McCarty; R A Wilke; J C Denny
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Merging Electronic Health Record Data and Genomics for Cardiovascular Research: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hall; John J Ryan; Bruce E Bray; Candice Brown; David Lanfear; L Kristin Newby; Mary V Relling; Neil J Risch; Dan M Roden; Stanley Y Shaw; James E Tcheng; Jessica Tenenbaum; Thomas N Wang; William S Weintraub
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2016-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.