Literature DB >> 12436236

Metrics for objective Assessment.

R M Satava1, A Cuschieri, J Hamdorf.   

Abstract

As the need for improved methods of assessing surgical competence grows, it is imperative to establish the basic infrastructure to ensure the ability to communicate among educators, education researchers, responsible training bodies, and credentialing boards. A workshop was conducted to provide a foundation for communication and a standardization of definitions, measurements, and criteria. Future conferences and workshops will be needed to review and refine this initial framework.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12436236     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8869-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

Review 1.  Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery.

Authors:  Krishna Moorthy; Yaron Munz; Sudip K Sarker; Ara Darzi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-01

2.  A head-to-head comparison between virtual reality and physical reality simulation training for basic skills acquisition.

Authors:  Constantinos Loukas; Nikolaos Nikiteas; Dimitrios Schizas; Vasileios Lahanas; Evangelos Georgiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Procedural performance in gastrointestinal endoscopy: live and simulated.

Authors:  Sudip K Sarker; Tark Albrani; Atiquaz Zaman; Isis Kumar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  High-level visual-spatial ability for novices correlates with performance in a visual-spatial complex surgical simulator task.

Authors:  L Hedman; P Ström; P Andersson; A Kjellin; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic surgical skills assessment: can simulators replace experts?

Authors:  Michael Pellen; Liam Horgan; J Roger Barton; Stephen Attwood
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Does rating with a checklist improve the effect of E-learning for cognitive and practical skills in bariatric surgery? A rater-blinded, randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Javier R De La Garza; Mona W Schmidt; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Laura Benner; Philip C Müller; Hannes G Kenngott; Lars Fischer; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting.

Authors:  Kai S Lehmann; Joerg P Ritz; Heiko Maass; Hueseyin K Cakmak; Uwe G Kuehnapfel; Christoph T Germer; Georg Bretthauer; Heinz J Buhr
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Construct validity of individual and summary performance metrics associated with a computer-based laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  Justin D Rivard; Ashley S Vergis; Bertram J Unger; Krista M Hardy; Chris G Andrew; Lawrence M Gillman; Jason Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Thomas S Lendvay; Timothy C Brand; Lee White; Timothy Kowalewski; Saikiran Jonnadula; Laina D Mercer; Derek Khorsand; Justin Andros; Blake Hannaford; Richard M Satava
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 10.  Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of present, past, and future.

Authors:  B M A Schout; A J M Hendrikx; F Scheele; B L H Bemelmans; A J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.