Literature DB >> 23572204

Interaction between scene-based and array-based contextual cueing.

Gail M Rosenbaum1, Yuhong V Jiang.   

Abstract

Contextual cueing refers to the cueing of spatial attention by repeated spatial context. Previous studies have demonstrated distinctive properties of contextual cueing by background scenes and by an array of search items. Whereas scene-based contextual cueing reflects explicit learning of the scene-target association, array-based contextual cueing is supported primarily by implicit learning. In this study, we investigated the interaction between scene-based and array-based contextual cueing. Participants searched for a target that was predicted by both the background scene and the locations of distractor items. We tested three possible patterns of interaction: (1) The scene and the array could be learned independently, in which case cueing should be expressed even when only one cue was preserved; (2) the scene and array could be learned jointly, in which case cueing should occur only when both cues were preserved; (3) overshadowing might occur, in which case learning of the stronger cue should preclude learning of the weaker cue. In several experiments, we manipulated the nature of the contextual cues present during training and testing. We also tested explicit awareness of scenes, scene-target associations, and arrays. The results supported the overshadowing account: Specifically, scene-based contextual cueing precluded array-based contextual cueing when both were predictive of the location of a search target. We suggest that explicit, endogenous cues dominate over implicit cues in guiding spatial attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23572204     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0446-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  11 in total

1.  Meaning in learning: Contextual cueing relies on objects' visual features and not on objects' meaning.

Authors:  Tal Makovski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

Review 2.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Response time modeling reveals multiple contextual cuing mechanisms.

Authors:  David K Sewell; Ben Colagiuri; Evan J Livesey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

4.  Modulation of spatial attention by goals, statistical learning, and monetary reward.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Li Z Sha; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Bo-Yeong Won; Julia D Cistera; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Scene-based contextual cueing in pigeons.

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Yuejia Teng; Daniel I Brooks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.478

7.  First saccadic eye movement reveals persistent attentional guidance by implicit learning.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Pigeons exhibit contextual cueing to both simple and complex backgrounds.

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Yuejia Teng; Leyre Castro
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  From Foreground to Background: How Task-Neutral Context Influences Contextual Cueing of Visual Search.

Authors:  Xuelian Zang; Thomas Geyer; Leonardo Assumpção; Hermann J Müller; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-07

10.  Differential Effects of Salient Visual Events on Memory-Guided Attention in Adults and Children.

Authors:  Kate Nussenbaum; Gaia Scerif; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2018-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.