Literature DB >> 14722904

Biophysical stimulation of bone fracture repair, regeneration and remodelling.

Edmund Y S Chao1, Nozomu Inoue.   

Abstract

Biophysical stimulation to enhance bone fracture repair and bone regenerate maturation to restore its structural strength must rely on both the biological and biomechanical principle according to the local tissue environment and the type of mechanical stress to be born by the skeletal joint system. This paper reviews the possible interactions between biophysical stimuli and cellular responses in healing bone fractures and proceeds to speculate the prospects and limitations of different experimental models in evaluating and optimising such non-invasive interventions. It is important to realize that bone fracture repair has several pathways with various combinations of bone formation mechanisms, but there may only be one bone remodeling principle regulated by the hypothesis proposed by Wolff. There are different mechanical and biophysical stimuli that could provide effective augmentation of fracture healing and bone regenerate maturation. The key requirements of establishing these positive interactions are to define the precise cellular response to the stimulation signal in an in vitro environment and to use well-established animal models to quantify and optimise the therapeutic regimen in a time-dependent manner. This can only be achieved through research collaboration among different disciplines using scientific methodologies. In addition, the specific forms of biophysical stimulation and its dose effect and application timing must be carefully determined and validated. Technological advances in achieving focalized stimulus delivery with adjustable signal type and intensity, in the ability to monitor healing callus mechanical property non-invasively, and in the establishment of a robust knowledge base to develop effective and reliable treatment protocols are the essential pre-requisites to make biophysical stimulation acceptable in the main arena of health care. Finally, it is important to bear in mind that successful fracture repair or bone regeneration through callus distraction without adequate remodeling process through physiological loading would seriously undermine the value of biophysical stimulation in meeting the biomechanical demand of a long bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14722904     DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v006a07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Cell Mater        ISSN: 1473-2262            Impact factor:   3.942


  20 in total

1.  One lesson from arthroplasty to osseointegration in search for better fixation of in-bone implanted prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark Pitkin
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

2.  Physical Stimulations for Bone and Cartilage Regeneration.

Authors:  Xiaobin Huang; Ritopa Das; Avi Patel; Thanh Duc Nguyen
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2018-06-25

3.  p38-MAPK signaling pathway is not involved in osteogenic differentiation during early response of mesenchymal stem cells to continuous mechanical strain.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Yuqiong Wu; Qinggang Dai; Bing Fang; Lingyong Jiang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.396

4.  Photostimulation of osteogenic differentiation on silk scaffolds by plasma arc light source.

Authors:  Anıl Sera Çakmak; Soner Çakmak; H Seda Vatansever; Menemşe Gümüşderelioğlu
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Effects of continuous or intermittent low-magnitude high-frequency vibration on fracture healing in sheep.

Authors:  Yanhui Li; Guozhao Liu; Jing Yu; Chen Li; Lei Tan; Baohui Hao; Chao Liu; Junhao Lin; Dong Zhu; Xizheng Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Play and players in bone fracture healing match.

Authors:  Lorenzo Marzona; Bernardo Pavolini
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-05

7.  Post-partum sacral fracture associated with heparin treatment.

Authors:  Vincent Goëb; Victor Strotz; Mathieu Verdet; Xavier Le Loët; Olivier Vittecoq
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Anabolic therapies.

Authors:  Nancy E Lane; Stuart L Silverman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Musculoskeletal response to whole-body vibration during fracture healing in intact and ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Ewa K Stuermer; Marina Komrakova; Carsten Werner; Michael Wicke; Leila Kolios; Stephan Sehmisch; Mohammad Tezval; Clara Utesch; Orzala Mangal; Sebastian Zimmer; Christian Dullin; Klaus M Stuermer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Enhanced bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects implanted with surface-modified and BMP-loaded bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Yongxing Liu; B Sonny Bal; Lynda F Bonewald
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.