Literature DB >> 22922251

Bone regeneration in strong porous bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds with an oriented microstructure implanted in rat calvarial defects.

Xin Liu1, Mohamed N Rahaman, Qiang Fu.   

Abstract

There is a need for synthetic bone graft substitutes to repair large bone defects resulting from trauma, malignancy and congenital diseases. Bioactive glass has attractive properties as a scaffold material but factors that influence its ability to regenerate bone in vivo are not well understood. In the present work, the ability of strong porous scaffolds of 13-93 bioactive glass with an oriented microstructure to regenerate bone was evaluated in vivo using a rat calvarial defect model. Scaffolds with an oriented microstructure of columnar pores (porosity=50%; pore diameter=50-150 μm) showed mostly osteoconductive bone regeneration, and new bone formation, normalized to the available pore area (volume) of the scaffolds, increased from 37% at 12 weeks to 55% at 24 weeks. Scaffolds of the same glass with a trabecular microstructure (porosity=80%; pore width=100-500 μm), used as the positive control, showed bone regeneration in the pores of 25% and 46% at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively. The brittle mechanical response of the as-fabricated scaffolds changed markedly to an elastoplastic response in vivo at both implantation times. These results indicate that both groups of 13-93 bioactive glass scaffolds could potentially be used to repair large bone defects, but scaffolds with the oriented microstructure could also be considered for the repair of loaded bone.
Copyright © 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22922251      PMCID: PMC3508352          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  34 in total

1.  Mechanical properties and cytocompatibility of poly(ε-caprolactone)-infiltrated biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds with bimodal pore distribution.

Authors:  Marianna Peroglio; Laurent Gremillard; Catherine Gauthier; Laurent Chazeau; Sophie Verrier; Mauro Alini; Jérôme Chevalier
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Preparation and in vitro evaluation of bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds with oriented microstructures for repair and regeneration of load-bearing bones.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Mohamed N Rahaman; B Sonny Bal; Roger F Brown
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  In vitro transformation of bioactive glass granules into Ca-P shells.

Authors:  S Radin; P Ducheyne; S Falaize; A Hammond
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-02

4.  In vivo evaluation of 13-93 bioactive glass scaffolds with trabecular and oriented microstructures in a subcutaneous rat implantation model.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Mohamed N Rahaman; B Sonny Bal; Keiichi Kuroki; Roger F Brown
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. I. Preparation and in vitro degradation.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Hailuo Fu; Xin Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Eduardo Saiz; Mohamed N Rahaman; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 7.328

7.  The mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multi-scale porosity.

Authors:  Joseph R Woodard; Amanda J Hilldore; Sheeny K Lan; C J Park; Abby W Morgan; Jo Ann C Eurell; Sherrie G Clark; Matthew B Wheeler; Russell D Jamison; Amy J Wagoner Johnson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W.

Authors:  T Kokubo; H Kushitani; S Sakka; T Kitsugi; T Yamamuro
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1990-06

Review 9.  Bone morphogenetic proteins and cancer: review of the literature.

Authors:  Jayesh P Thawani; Anthony C Wang; Khoi D Than; Chia-Ying Lin; Frank La Marca; Paul Park
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Osteogenesis in calvarial defects: contribution of the dura, the pericranium, and the surrounding bone in adult versus infant animals.

Authors:  Arun K Gosain; Timothy D Santoro; Lian-Sheng Song; Christopher C Capel; P V Sudhakar; Hani S Matloub
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Bioactive-glass in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Andrea Corrado Profeta; Christoph Huppa
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-05-21

2.  Mesoporous bioactive glass as a drug delivery system: fabrication, bactericidal properties and biocompatibility.

Authors:  Yang Li; Yi-Zhuo Liu; Teng Long; Xi-Bin Yu; Ting-Ting Tang; Ke-Rong Dai; Bo Tian; Ya-Ping Guo; Zhen-An Zhu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  A collagen-based hydrogel containing tacrolimus for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Mir Hamed Nabavi; Majid Salehi; Arian Ehterami; Farshid Bastami; Hassan Semyari; Maryam Tehranchi; Mir Ahmad Nabavi; Hossein Semyari
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.617

4.  Splitting fracture in bovine bone using a porosity-based spring network model.

Authors:  Ashwij Mayya; P Praveen; Anuradha Banerjee; R Rajesh
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Effects of sequentially released BMP-2 and BMP-7 from PELA microcapsule-based scaffolds on the bone regeneration.

Authors:  Xialin Li; Weihong Yi; Anmin Jin; Yang Duan; Shaoxiong Min
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Additive manufacturing of biomaterials.

Authors:  Susmita Bose; Dongxu Ke; Himanshu Sahasrabudhe; Amit Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Prog Mater Sci       Date:  2017-08-26

7.  Antibacterial and anticancerous drug loading kinetics for (10-x)CuO-xZnO-20CaO-60SiO2-10P2O5 (2 ≤ x ≤ 8) mesoporous bioactive glasses.

Authors:  Shikha Garg; Swati Thakur; Aayush Gupta; Gurbinder Kaur; Om Prakash Pandey
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Biomechanical analysis of engineered bone with anti-BMP2 antibody immobilized on different scaffolds.

Authors:  Sahar Ansari; Jin-Ho Phark; Sillas Duarte; Maike Paulino da Silva; Navid Sharifzadeh; Alireza Moshaverinia; Homayoun H Zadeh
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.368

9.  Enhanced bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects implanted with surface-modified and BMP-loaded bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Yongxing Liu; B Sonny Bal; Lynda F Bonewald
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 10.  Foam Replica Method in the Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: Out-of-Date Technology or Still Underexploited Potential?

Authors:  Elisa Fiume; Sara Ciavattini; Enrica Verné; Francesco Baino
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.