Literature DB >> 23565744

Attentional guidance by working memory overrides salience cues in visual search.

Emma Wu Dowd1, Stephen R Mitroff.   

Abstract

Many factors influence visual search, including how much targets stand out (i.e., their visual salience) and whether they are currently relevant (i.e., Are they in working memory?). Although these are two known influences on search performance, it is unclear how they interact to guide attention. The present study explored this interplay by having participants hold an item in memory for a subsequent test while simultaneously conducting a multiple-target visual search. Importantly, the memory item could match one or neither of two targets from the search. In Experiment 1, when the memory item did not match either target, participants found a high-salience target first, demonstrating a baseline salience effect. This effect was exaggerated when a high-salience target was in working memory and completely reversed when a low-salience target was in memory, demonstrating a powerful influence of working memory guidance. Experiment 2 amplified the salience effect by including very high-salience, "pop-out"-like targets. Yet this salience effect was still attenuated when the memory item matched a less salient target. Experiment 3 confirmed these were memory-based effects and not priming. Collectively, these findings illustrate the influential role of working memory in guiding visual attention, even in the face of competing bottom-up salience cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23565744     DOI: 10.1037/a0032548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Attention to future actions: the influence of instructed S-R versus S-S mappings on attentional control.

Authors:  Helen Tibboel; Baptist Liefooghe; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-06

2.  Opposing effects of stimulus-driven and memory-driven attention in visual search.

Authors:  Koeun Jung; Suk Won Han; Yoonki Min
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02

3.  Visual search in breast imaging.

Authors:  Ziba Gandomkar; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Similar mechanisms of temporary bindings for identity and location of objects in healthy ageing: an eye-tracking study with naturalistic scenes.

Authors:  Giorgia D'Innocenzo; Sergio Della Sala; Moreno I Coco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27

Review 6.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Understanding occipital and parietal contributions to visual working memory: Commentary on Xu (2020).

Authors:  Chunyue Teng; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2021-02-15

9.  Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback.

Authors:  Patrick H Cox; Dwight J Kravitz; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-03-19

10.  Resource-sharing between internal maintenance and external selection modulates attentional capture by working memory content.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.