Literature DB >> 33740159

Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback.

Patrick H Cox1, Dwight J Kravitz2, Stephen R Mitroff2.   

Abstract

Professions such as radiology and aviation security screening that rely on visual search-the act of looking for targets among distractors-often cannot provide operators immediate feedback, which can create situations where performance may be largely driven by the searchers' own expectations. For example, if searchers do not expect relatively hard-to-spot targets to be present in a given search, they may find easy-to-spot targets but systematically quit searching before finding more difficult ones. Without feedback, searchers can create self-fulfilling prophecies where they incorrectly reinforce initial biases (e.g., first assuming and then, perhaps wrongly, concluding hard-to-spot targets are rare). In the current study, two groups of searchers completed an identical visual search task but with just a single difference in their initial task instructions before the experiment started; those in the "high-expectation" condition were told that each trial could have one or two targets present (i.e., correctly implying no target-absent trials) and those in the "low-expectation" condition were told that each trial would have up to two targets (i.e., incorrectly implying there could be target-absent trials). Compared to the high-expectation group, the low-expectation group had a lower hit rate, lower false alarm rate and quit trials more quickly, consistent with a lower quitting threshold (i.e., performing less exhaustive searches) and a potentially higher target-present decision criterion. The expectation effect was present from the start and remained across the experiment-despite exposure to the same true distribution of targets, the groups' performances remained divergent, primarily driven by the different subjective experiences caused by each groups' self-fulfilling prophecies. The effects were limited to the single-targets trials, which provides insights into the mechanisms affected by the initial expectations set by the instructions. In sum, initial expectations can have dramatic influences-searchers who do not expect to find a target, are less likely to find a target as they are more likely to quit searching earlier.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Expectation; Feedback; Instructions; Self-fulling prophecy; Visual search

Year:  2021        PMID: 33740159      PMCID: PMC7975232          DOI: 10.1186/s41235-021-00286-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic        ISSN: 2365-7464


  42 in total

1.  Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Luca Brunese
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-28

2.  The effects of local prevalence and explicit expectations on search termination times.

Authors:  Kazuya Ishibashi; Shinichi Kita; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.

Authors:  M M Chun; Y Jiang
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  K S Berbaum; E A Franken; D D Dorfman; S A Rooholamini; M H Kathol; T J Barloon; F M Behlke; Y Sato; C H Lu; G Y el-Khoury
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Differences in multiple-target visual search performance between non-professional and professional searchers due to decision-making criteria.

Authors:  Adam T Biggs; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2014-09-30

6.  Generalized "satisfaction of search": adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy.

Authors:  Mathias S Fleck; Ehsan Samei; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2010-03

7.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

8.  Examining perceptual and conceptual set biases in multiple-target visual search.

Authors:  Adam T Biggs; Stephen H Adamo; Emma Wu Dowd; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Visual search.

Authors:  Louis K H Chan; William G Hayward
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-03-19

10.  Probability cueing influences miss rate and decision criterion in visual searches.

Authors:  Kazuya Ishibashi; Shinichi Kita
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-08-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  How one block of trials influences the next: persistent effects of disease prevalence and feedback on decisions about images of skin lesions in a large online study.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-02-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.