Literature DB >> 27021618

A comparative study on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement assisted by personalized rapid prototyping template between pre- and post-operation in patients with relatively normal mid-upper thoracic spine.

Yong Hu1, Zhen-Shan Yuan2, William Ryan Spiker3, Wei-Xin Dong2, Xiao-Yang Sun2, Jian-Bing Yuan4, Jiao Zhang2, Bingke Zhu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of rapid prototyping drill template technique for placing pedicle screws in the mid-upper thoracic vertebrae in clinics.
METHODS: 151 consecutive patients underwent thoracic instrumentation and fusion for a total of 582 pedicle screws placed in the mid-upper thoracic vertebrae. Using computer software, the authors constructed drill templates that fit onto the posterior elements of the mid-upper thoracic vertebrae with drill guides designed to instrument the pedicles. The start point and three dimensional location of the planned and inserted screws were measured and compared.
RESULTS: Grading of the CT scans revealed 559 (96.1 %) out of 582 screws completely within the desired pedicle. The direction of pedicle violation included 5 medial, 2 airball, and 16 lateral. The paired t test suggested that these results were statistically significant in more than half of the locations (T1-left-TA(P = 0.024), T2-left-SA(P = 0.031), T3-left-SA(P = 0.014), T4-left-TA(P = 0.004), T5-left-TA(P = 0.034), T7-left-TA(P = 0.000). T1-right-TA(P = 0.049), T2-right-TA(P = 0.044), T3-right-TA(P = 0.014), T5-right-TA(P = 0.013)). The paired t-test suggested that these results were statistically significant at several locations (T4-left-Δy(P = 0.041), T5-left-Δx(P = 0.016), T3-right-Δy(P = 0.015)).
CONCLUSION: Use of a rapid prototyping drill template to assist in the placement of mid and upper thoracic pedicle screws may lead to increased accuracy. This patient specific technology must be combined with an understanding of the patients' anatomy and carefully secured to the posterior elements intraoperatively to avoid nerve or vascular complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pedicle screw; Personalized drill template; Post–pre registration; Rapid prototyping; Thoracic

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27021618     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4540-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  39 in total

1.  Axial and tangential fixation strength of pedicle screws versus hooks in the thoracic spine in relation to bone mineral density.

Authors:  Lars Hackenberg; Thomas Link; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Outcome-based classification for assessment of thoracic pedicular screw placement.

Authors:  Bidre N Upendra; Devkant Meena; Buddhadev Chowdhury; Abrar Ahmad; Arvind Jayaswal
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Intraoperative cone beam-computed tomography with navigation (O-ARM) versus conventional fluoroscopy (C-ARM): a cadaveric study comparing accuracy, efficiency, and safety for spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  Ehsan Tabaraee; Anthony G Gibson; Dean G Karahalios; Eric A Potts; Jean-Pierre Mobasser; Shane Burch
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tao Ma; Yong-Qing Xu; Yu-Bin Cheng; Mu-Yao Jiang; Xing-Ming Xu; Le Xie; Sheng Lu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  A multi-level rapid prototyping drill guide template reduces the perforation risk of pedicle screw placement in the lumbar and sacral spine.

Authors:  Matjaz Merc; Igor Drstvensek; Matjaz Vogrin; Tomaz Brajlih; Gregor Recnik
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Deviation analysis of C2 translaminar screw placement assisted by a novel rapid prototyping drill template: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Yong Hu; Zhen-shan Yuan; William Ryan Spiker; Todd J Albert; Wei-xin Dong; Hui Xie; Jian-bing Yuan; Cheng-tao Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Error rate of multi-level rapid prototyping trajectories for pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine.

Authors:  Matjaz Merc; Igor Drstvensek; Matjaz Vogrin; Tomaz Brajlih; Tomaz Friedrich; Gregor Recnik
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2014

8.  Descending aortic injury by a thoracic pedicle screw during posterior reconstructive surgery: a case report.

Authors:  Kei Watanabe; Akiyoshi Yamazaki; Toru Hirano; Tomohiro Izumi; Atsuki Sano; Osamu Morita; Ren Kikuchi; Takui Ito
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part I: Morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae.

Authors:  A R Vaccaro; S J Rizzolo; T J Allardyce; M Ramsey; J Salvo; R A Balderston; J M Cotler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in scoliosis using the ideal pedicle entry point during the freehand technique.

Authors:  Hitesh Modi; Seung Woo Suh; Hae-Ryong Song; Jae-Hyuk Yang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Measuring and Establishing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of 3D Printed Medical Models.

Authors:  Elizabeth George; Peter Liacouras; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  A Aichmair; M Moser; M R Bauer; E Bachmann; J G Snedeker; M Betz; M Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Pedicle screw insertion with patient-specific 3D-printed guides based on low-dose CT scan is more accurate than free-hand technique in spine deformity patients: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Riccardo Cecchinato; Pedro Berjano; Alberto Zerbi; Marco Damilano; Andrea Redaelli; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Clinical applications and prospects of 3D printing guide templates in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Meng Meng; Jinzuo Wang; Tianze Sun; Wentao Zhang; Jing Zhang; Liming Shu; Zhonghai Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.889

5.  Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Michael Betz; Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Manuel Moser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Occipitocervical instrumented fixation utilising patient-specific C2 3D-printed spinal screw trajectory guides in complex paediatric skeletal dysplasia.

Authors:  Vejay N Vakharia; Luke Smith; Zubair Tahir; Rachel Sparks; Sebastien Ourselin; Stewart Tucker; Dominic Thompson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Generating patient-matched 3D-printed pedicle screw and laminectomy drill guides from Cone Beam CT images: Studies in ovine and porcine cadavers.

Authors:  Andrew Kanawati; Alex Constantinidis; Zoe Williams; Ricky O'Brien; Tess Reynolds
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.506

8.  Accuracy of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Drill Guides for Pedicle and Lateral Mass Screw Insertion: An Analysis of 76 Cervical and Thoracic Screw Trajectories.

Authors:  Peter A J Pijpker; Joep Kraeima; Max J H Witjes; D L Marinus Oterdoom; Rob A Vergeer; Maarten H Coppes; Rob J M Groen; Jos M A Kuijlen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.