| Literature DB >> 23554864 |
Tefera Belachew1, David Lindstrom, Abebe Gebremariam, Dennis Hogan, Carl Lachat, Lieven Huybregts, Patrick Kolsteren.
Abstract
Despite the high prevalence of adolescent food insecurity in Ethiopia, there is no study which documented its association with suboptimal dietary practices. The objective of this study is to determine the association between adolescent food insecurity and dietary practices. We used data on 2084 adolescents in the age group of 13-17 years involved in the first round survey of the five year longitudinal family study in Southwest Ethiopia. Adolescents were selected using residence stratified random sampling methods. Food insecurity was measured using scales validated in developing countries. Dietary practices were measured using dietary diversity score, food variety score and frequency of consuming animal source food. Multivariable regression models were used to compare dietary behaviors by food security status after controlling for socio-demographic and economic covariates. Food insecure adolescents had low dietary diversity score (P<0.001), low mean food variety score (P<0.001) and low frequency of consuming animal source foods (P<0.001). After adjusting for other variables in a multivariable logistic regression model, adolescent food insecurity (P<0.001) and rural residence (P<0.001) were negatively associated with the likelihood of having a diversified diet (P<0.001) and frequency of consuming animal source foods, while a high household income tertile was positively associated. Similarly, multivariable linear regression model showed that adolescent food insecurity was negatively associated with food variety score, while residence in semi-urban areas (P<0.001), in urban areas (P<0.001) and high household income tertile (P = 0.013) were positively associated. Girls were less likely to have diversified diet (P = 0.001) compared with boys. Our findings suggest that food insecurity has negative consequence on optimal dietary intake of adolescents. Food security interventions should look into ways of targeting adolescents to mitigate these dietary consequences and provide alternative strategies to improve dietary quality of adolescents in Southwest Ethiopia.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23554864 PMCID: PMC3595236 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057643
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Proportion of adolescents who consumed specific food item at least once in a week in any given week during the last 3 months before the survey by their food security status.*
| Food items consumed | Adolescent Food security Status | |||
| Food secure (%) (n = 1656) | Food insecure (%) (n = 428) | Total (%) (n = 2084) |
| |
|
| ||||
| Teff ( | 99.486.759.066.779.842.9 | 98.181.354.951.981.128.7 | 99.185.658.263.780.040.0 | 0.0120.0050.126<0.0010.547<0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Sweet potatoPotatoCarrotsTomatoCauliflowerGreen leafy vegetables | 67.087.750.369.712.781.3 | 68.087.140.469.29.386.0 | 67.287.648.369.612.082.3 | 0.7060.740<0.0010.8140.0540.025 |
|
| ||||
| AvocadoPapayaBananaPineappleOranges | 44.466.791.212.779.4 | 29.755.684.610.772.7 | 41.464.489.812.378.0 | <0.001<0.001<0.0010.2770.003 |
|
| ||||
| MilkCheese | 57.067.8 | 42.359.8 | 54.066.1 | <0.0010.002 |
|
| ||||
| BeefFishChickenGoat or muttonLiverEggsNutsLegumes | 32.44.95.726.98.062.468.094.1 | 20.82.63.016.98.242.551.093.2 | 30.04.45.124.88.158.364.693.9 | <0.0010.0370.027<0.0010.9217<0.001<0.0010.508 |
|
| ||||
| ButterOil | 71.498.1 | 61.997.2 | 69.497.9 | <0.0010.227 |
|
| ||||
| Soft drinks | 25.4 | 12.4 | 22.7 | <0.001 |
Most of the significant differences observed were on food items which became very expensive.
Percentages refer to the proportion of adolescents who consumed the food item over the last 7 days and are calculated from column total. 1The significance level is 0.0016 [0.05/30) due to Bonferroni correction.
A Chi-square test was used to calculate the P values.
Mean (±SD) intake of food groups per week in any given week during the last 3 months before the survey by food security status and sex.
| Food Groups | All (n = 2084) | Boys(n = 1059) | Girls(n = 1025) | |||
| FS(n = 1656) | FIS(n = 428) | FS(n = 892) | FIS(n = 167) | FS(n = 764) | FIS(n = 261) | |
| Grains | 1.00(±0.02) | 1.00(±0.05) | 1.00(±0.03) | 1.00(±0.00) | 1.00(±0.00) | 1.00(±0.06) |
| Vegetables | 0.99(±0.10) | 0.99(±0.08) | 0.99(±0.12) | 0.99(0.11) | 0.99(±0.10) | 0.99(±0.06) |
| Fruits | 0.98(±0.12) | 0.94(±0.23) | 0.98(±0.13) | 0.89(±0.30) | 0.99(±0.11) | 0.97(±0.17) |
| Dairy | 0.80(±0.40) | 0.71(±0.45) | 0.29(±0.46) | 0.12(±0.32) | 0.82(±0.38) | 0.69(±0.46) |
| Protein source foods(both plant and animal) | 1.00(±0.07) | 0.99(±0.11) | 0.99(±0.09) | 0.98(±1.13) | 1.00(±0.00) | 0.99(±0.09) |
| Oils | 0.99(±0.09) | 0.98(±0.14) | 0.99(±0.11) | 0.97(±0.17) | 1.00(±0.04) | 0.99(±0.12) |
| Discretionary calories | 0.25(±0.43) | 0.12(±0.32) | 0.79(±0.41) | 0.74(±0.43) | 0.21(±0.41) | 0.13(0.33)** |
P<0.001, **P<0.01.
T-test was done to assess the differences between food secure and food insecure groups by intake of the different food groups. The food items were grouped according to MyPyramid [USDA, 2005).
Means [±SD) are given unless indicated otherwise.
The p values compare the means frequency of consumption of the different food groups per week between food secure and food insecure adolescents and the maximum value for the group is 1.
FS = food Secure, FIS = Food Insecure.
Food based coping strategies used among food insecure adolescents in southwest Ethiopia during the last three months before the survey.
| Food based coping strategy(n = 428) | Never | 1–7 Days | 8–21 Days | >21 Days |
| % | % | % | % | |
| Number of days adolescent had to reduce the number of meals eaten in a day, because of shortages of food or money to buy food during the last 3 months | 10.7 | 78.0 | 6.8 | 4.4 |
| Number of days the adolescent worried that he/she would run out of food or not have enough money to buy food during the last 3 months | 18.2 | 69.6 | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Number of days the adolescent had to spend the whole day without eating, because of shortages of food or money to buy food during the last 3 months | 76.2 | 19.2 | 1.9 | 2.8 |
| Number of days the adolescent had to ask for food or money to buy food(beg) during the last 3 months | 79.2 | 17.8 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
The last 3 months refer to time before interview of the adolescent.
Percentage is calculated out of row totals.
Dietary diversity, food variety score and the consumption of animal source food by adolescent and household food security status and socio-demographic variables (n = 2084).
| Characteristics | Dietary Diversity Score | FVS | Frequency of ASF Intake* | |||||
| Low (%) (n = 1678) | High (%) |
| Mean(±SD) |
| Low (%) (n = 1161) | High (%) |
| |
| Adolescent food securityFood secureFood Insecure | 78.090.4 | 22.09.6 |
| 17.2(±3.9)15.2(±3.8) |
| 64.772.9 | 35.327.1 |
|
| Sex of the adolescentFemaleMale | 83.977.2 | 16.122.8 |
| 16.7(±3.6)16.8(±4.3) |
| 65.267.5 | 34.832.5 |
|
| Age in completed years1314151617 | 87.382.978.175.476.5 | 12.717.121.924.623.5 |
| 16.3(±3.7)16.9(±3.9)16.7(±4.0)17.1(±4.1)17.1(±4.2) |
| 74.265.665.363.560.9 | 25.834.434.736.539.1 |
|
| Place of residenceUrbanSemi-urbanRural | 72.878.390.0 | 27.221.710.0 |
| 16.7(±4.3)18.0(±3.7)16.0(±3.6) |
| 49.965.483.6 | 50.134.616.4 |
|
| Household income tertileLowMiddleHigh | 87.284.569.9 | 12.815.530.1 |
| 16.4(±3.8)16.5(±4.0)17.5(±4.0) |
| 79.271.448.6 | 20.828.651.4 |
|
| Dependency Ratio, TertilesLowMiddleHigh | 77.379.984.0 | 22.720.116.0 |
| 17.1(±4.0)16.7(±4.0)16.7(±3.8) |
| 61.665.771.4 | 38.434.328.6 |
|
| Educational status of the adolescentPrimarySecondary & above | 83.068.4 | 17.031.6 |
| 16.6(±3.9)17.3(±4.2) |
| 69.751.4 | 30.348.6 |
|
High = 3rd tertile of frequency of ASF consumption, Low = the two lower tertiles of frequency of ASF consumption combined.
T-test was used for all mea comparisons with two groups and one way-ANOVA was use for comparing more than 2 means.
Proportions were compared using Chi-square tests.
Consumption of ASF refers to consumption of at least one of the 10 ASF in the food frequency questionnaire once per week.
High = DDS of the highest (3rd) tertile, Low = the two lower DDS tertiles combined.
DDS: dietary diversity score, FVS = food variety score and ASF = Animal Source foods.
Primary = grade 1–8.
Parameter estimates from linear regression predicting food variety score among adolescents.¶
| Predictors(n = 2084) | β | SE |
|
| Adolescent food insecurity (Ref. = food secure) | −1.993 | 0.219 | <0.001 |
| Age of adolescent(Years) | 0.137 | 0.072 | 0.058 |
| Dependency ratio middle tertile (ref: low tertile) | −0.212 | 0.217 | 0.328 |
| Dependency ratio tertile high (ref: lowest tertile) | −0.029 | 0.229 | 0.898 |
| Household income middle tertile (ref: low tertile) | 0.112 | 0.214 | 0.601 |
| Household income tertile high (ref: low tertile) | 0.636 | 0.244 | 0.009 |
| Education: secondary or above (ref: primary) | −0.008 | 0.271 | 0.978 |
| Urban residence (ref :Rural) | 0.513 | 0.244 | 0.036 |
| Semi urban residence (ref: Rural) | 1.818 | 0.232 | <0.001 |
Multivariable linear regression model with the Food Variety Score as a dependent variable and predictors with
P<0.05 of the bivariate model.
Adjusted R2 = 0.085.
Ref = reference category.
Coefficients as obtained from a multivariable linear regression model.
Maximum Variance inflation factor = 1.78.
SE = Standard error.
Table 5. Multivariable logistic regression model predicting the likelihood of having high dietary diversity, high frequency of consuming animal source foods per week among adolescents.¶
| Predictor Variables(n = 2084) | n | High Dietary diversity Score | High frequency of ASF intake | ||||
| β | OR(95%CI) |
| β | OR(95%CI) |
| ||
| Adolescent food security | |||||||
| Food secure (ref) | 1656 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Food insecure | 428 | −0.87 | 0.42(0.29−0.62) |
| −0.41 | 0.67(0.51−0.87) |
|
| Sex of the adolescent | |||||||
| Male (ref) | 1059 | 1 | |||||
| Female | 1025 | −0.41 | 0.66(0.52−0.84) |
| — | — | — |
| Age of the adolescent (years) | 2084 | 0.14 | 1.15(1.04−1.27) |
| 0.07 | 1.07(0.99−1.17) |
|
| Place of residence | |||||||
| Urban (ref) | 746 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Semi-urban | 589 | −0.21 | 0.81(0.61−1.08) |
| −0.51 | 0.60(0.47−0.77) |
|
| Rural | 749 | −1.00 | 0.37(0.26−0.53) |
| −1.26 | 0.28(0.21−0.38) |
|
| Household income (tertiles) | |||||||
| Low(ref) | 687 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Middle | 702 | 0.09 | 1.09(0.79−1.51) |
| 0.28 | 1.32(1.01−1.72) |
|
| High | 695 | 0.48 | 1.61(1.16−2.24) |
| 0.85 | 2.33(1.76−3.08) |
|
| Dependency ratio (tertiles) | |||||||
| Low (ref) | 635 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Middle | 743 | 0.11 | 1.12(0.85−1.49) |
| 0.05 | 1.05(0.83−1.35) |
|
| High | 706 | 0.06 | 1.06(0.78−1.46) |
| 0.10 | 1.10(0.84−1.44) |
|
| Educational status(Adol) | |||||||
| Primary (ref) | 1583 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Secondary and above | 501 | 0.13 | 1.14(0.82−1.59) |
| 0.422 | 1.02(0.76−1.37) |
|
| Hosemer Lemeshow Test (P) | 0.113 | 0.895 | |||||
| Cox and Snell's Pseudo R2 | 0.083 | 0.071 | |||||
Parameters estimates were adjusted for the tabulated variables. Ref: indicates the reference category.
Maximum Variance inflation factor = 1.96.
Parameters estimates adjusted for: Dependency ratio, household income, gender of the household head.
Coefficients as obtained from a multivariable linear regression model.
High = 3rd tertile for both DDS and frequency of ASF consumption.
Adol = Adolescent.