OBJECTIVES: Early childhood malnutrition is a pressing international concern which dietary diversity scores (summary scores of food groups in the diet) may be helpful in addressing. We explored three current research needs surrounding diversity scores: the impact of portion size on score function, the relationship of scores to nutrient adequacy and density and the ability of scores to function as screening tools. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: 1810 children, age 24 months. Cross sectional study of a birth cohort. RESULTS: We evaluated two nine food group dietary diversity scores based on 0 and 10 g minimum food group requirements for their relationship to nutrient adequacy and nutrient density. Both scores were significantly correlated with nutrient adequacy and density and predicted statistically significant increases (P<0.05) in the probability of adequacy for all nutrients. However, correlations and predicted increases were somewhat larger for the 10 g score. We also considered the sensitivity and specificity of each score for detecting low and high nutrient adequacy in the population. The 10 g cutoff improved score ability to predict low nutrient adequacy, and reduced the misclassification of subjects for all comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: This research suggests that the score without portion requirements reflects dietary adequacy, but when feasible, further refinement of diversity scores is desirable through the application of minimum portion requirements.
OBJECTIVES: Early childhood malnutrition is a pressing international concern which dietary diversity scores (summary scores of food groups in the diet) may be helpful in addressing. We explored three current research needs surrounding diversity scores: the impact of portion size on score function, the relationship of scores to nutrient adequacy and density and the ability of scores to function as screening tools. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: 1810 children, age 24 months. Cross sectional study of a birth cohort. RESULTS: We evaluated two nine food group dietary diversity scores based on 0 and 10 g minimum food group requirements for their relationship to nutrient adequacy and nutrient density. Both scores were significantly correlated with nutrient adequacy and density and predicted statistically significant increases (P<0.05) in the probability of adequacy for all nutrients. However, correlations and predicted increases were somewhat larger for the 10 g score. We also considered the sensitivity and specificity of each score for detecting low and high nutrient adequacy in the population. The 10 g cutoff improved score ability to predict low nutrient adequacy, and reduced the misclassification of subjects for all comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: This research suggests that the score without portion requirements reflects dietary adequacy, but when feasible, further refinement of diversity scores is desirable through the application of minimum portion requirements.
Authors: Scott B Ickes; Linda S Adair; Catherine A Brahe; Harsha Thirumurthy; Baguma Charles; Jennifer A Myhre; Margaret E Bentley; Alice S Ammerman Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Tefera Belachew; David Lindstrom; Abebe Gebremariam; Dennis Hogan; Carl Lachat; Lieven Huybregts; Patrick Kolsteren Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dieu T T Huynh; Elvira Estorninos; Maria Rosario Capeding; Jeffery S Oliver; Yen Ling Low; Francisco J Rosales Journal: J Nutr Sci Date: 2016-05-13
Authors: Yohannes Adama Melaku; Tiffany K Gill; Anne W Taylor; Robert Adams; Zumin Shi; Amare Worku Journal: Nutr J Date: 2018-01-29 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Marianne Sandsmark Morseth; Navnit Kaur Grewal; Ida Sophie Kaasa; Anne Hatloy; Ingrid Barikmo; Sigrun Henjum Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 3.295