OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to assess the validity of a 52-item semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) by comparing it with multiple 24-hour dietary recalls. DESIGN: Three non-consecutive 24-hour dietary recalls and one FFQ were administered over a one-month period. SETTING: Four communities of El Progreso, Guatemala. SUBJECTS: Seventy-three individuals aged 22-55 years. RESULTS: : Intakes of energy and other nutrients as measured by the FFQ were higher than intakes measured by 24-hour recalls. Energy was overestimated by 361 kcal, and nutrient overestimates were particularly great for vitamin C and iron. Pearson correlation coefficients for crude energy and nutrients intakes ranged from 0.64 for energy to 0.12 for vitamin C. Exact agreement for both methods (measured by the concordance correlation coefficient) ranged from 0.59 (fat) to 0.06 (vitamin C). Pearson correlation coefficients for energy-adjusted nutrients ranged from 0.59 (carbohydrates) to 0.11 (thiamin). Pearson correlation coefficients for the proportion of total energy derived from specific foods ranged from 0.59 (tortillas) to 0.01 (sugared beverages). Cross-classification of quartiles of crude nutrient intakes for both methods indicated that <11% were grossly misclassified; after adjusting for energy intake, <13% were grossly misclassified. CONCLUSIONS: This FFQ provides good measures of energy and macronutrient intakes and a reasonably reliable measure of micronutrient intake, indicating its suitability for comparing exposures within a study population in reference to heath-related endpoints. Our results highlight the need to adapt any FFQ to specific cultural needs - in this case, the Guatemalan 'core foods' (tortilla, bread and beans), for which inter-individual variability in intake is high.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to assess the validity of a 52-item semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) by comparing it with multiple 24-hour dietary recalls. DESIGN: Three non-consecutive 24-hour dietary recalls and one FFQ were administered over a one-month period. SETTING: Four communities of El Progreso, Guatemala. SUBJECTS: Seventy-three individuals aged 22-55 years. RESULTS: : Intakes of energy and other nutrients as measured by the FFQ were higher than intakes measured by 24-hour recalls. Energy was overestimated by 361 kcal, and nutrient overestimates were particularly great for vitamin C and iron. Pearson correlation coefficients for crude energy and nutrients intakes ranged from 0.64 for energy to 0.12 for vitamin C. Exact agreement for both methods (measured by the concordance correlation coefficient) ranged from 0.59 (fat) to 0.06 (vitamin C). Pearson correlation coefficients for energy-adjusted nutrients ranged from 0.59 (carbohydrates) to 0.11 (thiamin). Pearson correlation coefficients for the proportion of total energy derived from specific foods ranged from 0.59 (tortillas) to 0.01 (sugared beverages). Cross-classification of quartiles of crude nutrient intakes for both methods indicated that <11% were grossly misclassified; after adjusting for energy intake, <13% were grossly misclassified. CONCLUSIONS: This FFQ provides good measures of energy and macronutrient intakes and a reasonably reliable measure of micronutrient intake, indicating its suitability for comparing exposures within a study population in reference to heath-related endpoints. Our results highlight the need to adapt any FFQ to specific cultural needs - in this case, the Guatemalan 'core foods' (tortilla, bread and beans), for which inter-individual variability in intake is high.
Authors: Rachel M Zack; Kahema Irema; Patrick Kazonda; Germana H Leyna; Enju Liu; Susan Gilbert; Zohra Lukmanji; Donna Spiegelman; Wafaie Fawzi; Marina Njelekela; Japhet Killewo; Goodarz Danaei Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Cria O Gregory; Reynaldo Martorell; K M Narayan; Manuel Ramirez-Zea; Aryeh D Stein Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Pedro Marques-Vidal; Alastair Ross; Emma Wynn; Serge Rezzi; Fred Paccaud; Bernard Decarli Journal: Food Nutr Res Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Lin Liu; Peizhong Peter Wang; Barbara Roebothan; Ann Ryan; Christina Sandra Tucker; Jennifer Colbourne; Natasha Baker; Michelle Cotterchio; Yanqing Yi; Guang Sun Journal: Nutr J Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Tefera Belachew; David Lindstrom; Abebe Gebremariam; Dennis Hogan; Carl Lachat; Lieven Huybregts; Patrick Kolsteren Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 3.240