| Literature DB >> 20214090 |
Nurul Alam1, Swapan Kumar Roy, Tahmeed Ahmed, A M Shamsir Ahmed.
Abstract
This study estimated the levels and differentials in nutritional status and dietary intake and relevant knowledge of adolescent girls in rural Bangladesh using data from the Baseline Survey 2004 of the National Nutrition Programme. A stratified two-stage random cluster-sampling was used for selecting 4,993 unmarried adolescent girls aged 13-18 years in 708 rural clusters. Female interviewers visited girls at home to record their education, occupation, dietary knowledge, seven-day food-frequency, intake of iron and folic acid, morbidity, weight, and height. They inquired mothers about age of their daughters and possessions of durable assets to divide households into asset quintiles. Results revealed that 26% of the girls were thin, with body mass index (BMI)-for-age <15th percentile), 0.3% obese (BMI-for-age >95th percentile), and 32% stunted (height-for-age < or = 2SD). Risks of being thin and stunted were higher if girls had general morbidity in the last fortnight and foul-smelling vaginal discharge than their peers. Consumptions of non-staple good-quality food items in the last week were less frequent and correlated well positively with the household asset quintile. Girls of the highest asset quintile ate fish/meat 2.1 (55%) days more and egg/milk two (91%) days more than the girls in the lowest asset quintile. The overall dietary knowledge was low. More than half could not name the main food sources of energy and protein, and 36% were not aware of the importance of taking extra nutrients during adolescence for growth spurt. The use of iron supplement was 21% in nutrition-intervention areas compared to 8% in non-intervention areas. Factors associated with the increased use of iron supplements were related to awareness of the girls about extra nutrients and their access to mass media and education. Community-based adolescent-friendly health and nutrition education and services and economic development may improve the overall health and nutritional knowledge and status of adolescents.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20214090 PMCID: PMC2975850 DOI: 10.3329/jhpn.v28i1.4527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Levels and differentials in prevalence (%) and odds ratio of severe and moderate thinness among never-married adolescent girls aged 13–18 years (n=4,993) for different characteristics
| Characteristics | % of adolescent girls | Thinness (BMI <15th percentile) | Stunting (HAZ <-2SD) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence (%) | Adjusted OR | Prevalence (%) | Adjusted OR | ||
| Age (years) | |||||
| 13 | 20.2 | 30.7 | 1.00 | 15.9 | 1.00 |
| 14 | 23.7 | 23.0 | 0.73 | 26.4 | 2.18 |
| 15 | 21.8 | 19.6 | 0.63 | 34.2 | 3.48 |
| 16 | 15.9 | 23.4 | 0.77 | 42.7 | 5.61 |
| 17 | 10.2 | 28.4 | 1.05 (0.79–1.41) | 43.9 | 5.74 |
| 18 | 8.1 | 33.0 | 1.27 (0.93–1.74) | 48.3 | 6.67 |
| Morbidity in the last two weeks | |||||
| No | 66.5 | 24.5 | 1.00 | 31.0 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 33.5 | 27.0 | 1.17 | 34.2 | 1.03 (0.88–1.21) |
| Foul-smelling vaginal discharge | |||||
| No | 73.9 | 22.4 | 1.00 | 31.4 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 20.7 | 26.7 | 1.21 | 33.5 | 1.20 |
| No menarche yet | 5.5 | 58.0 | 5.40 | 37.3 | 2.86 |
| Knew need of extra nutrients | |||||
| No | 35.7 | 25.0 | 1.00 | 32.8 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 64.3 | 25.4 | 1.01 (0.85–1.20) | 31.7 | 0.91 (0.78–1.06) |
| Exposure to mass media | |||||
| Low | 41.2 | 25.3 | 1.00 | 34.7 | 1.00 |
| High | 58.8 | 25.3 | 0.99 (0.83–1.17) | 30.3 | 0.85 (0.73–1.00) |
| Education level | |||||
| Up to primary | 31.6 | 25.6 | 1.00 | 37.2 | 1.00 |
| Secondary + | 68.4 | 25.1 | 1.05 (0.86–1.27) | 29.8 | 0.60 |
| Household asset quintile | |||||
| Lowest | 20.1 | 24.9 | 1.00 | 34.5 | 1.00 |
| Second lowest | 20.2 | 25.0 | 0.87 (0.68–1.11) | 33.6 | 1.09 (0.88–1.35) |
| Middle | 20.2 | 24.3 | 0.93 (0.72–1.19) | 31.9 | 0.99 (0.78–1.25) |
| Fourth | 19.9 | 25.7 | 0.98 (0.76–1.27) | 29.0 | 0.85 (0.66–1.09) |
| Highest | 19.7 | 26.3 | 1.05 (0.80–1.38) | 31.6 | 1.01 (0.78–1.31) |
| Survey upazila | |||||
| NNP | 46.1 | 26.3 | 1.00 | 31.6 | 1.00 |
| BINP | 38.3 | 24.3 | 0.95 (0.80–1.11) | 32.4 | 1.05 (0.91–1.21) |
| Comparison | 15.5 | 24.7 | 0.90 (0.72–1.12) | 33.2 | 1.06 (0.86–1.30) |
| All | 100 | 25.3 | 32.2 | ||
| Modelχ2 (with df) | 174.8 (17), p<0.001 | 317.9 (17), p<0.001 | |||
The dependent variable equals to 1 if BMI of a girl was below the 15th percentile value of BMI-for-age or height-for-age <-2SD in WHO reference for girls, 0 otherwise;
†OR was adjusted for clustering of nutrition status of girls of the same clusters;
*p<0.05,
**p<0.01 (compared with reference category);
BINP=Bangladesh Integrated Nutrition Project;
BMI=Body mass index;
df=Degree of freedom;
HAZ=Height-for-age z-score;
NNP=National Nutrition Programme;
OR=Odds ratio;
SD=Standard deviation;
WHO=World Health Organization
Self-reported general and reproductive morbidity in adolescent girls
| General morbidity symptoms in the last two weeks | Foul-smelling vaginal discharge | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | Any symptom | Fever | Cough/cold | Diarrhoea | Stomachache | Skin problem | Others | |
| 66.5 | 33.5 | 16.9 | 8.0 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 13.4 | 22.9 |
*Among girls who reached menarche before the date of the survey
Weekly pattern of consumptions of selected food items by adolescent girls
| Food item | Frequency of consumption, days per week | Mean days | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (%) | 1–3 (%) | 4–5 (%) | 6–7 (%) | ||
| Fish | 9.1 | 34.1 | 15.7 | 41.1 | 3.4 |
| Meat | 50.5 | 45.0 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 |
| Eggs | 39.8 | 47.3 | 6.7 | 6.2 | 1.1 |
| Milk | 50.0 | 21.2 | 4.0 | 24.7 | 1.9 |
| 25.3 | 52.6 | 9.3 | 12.7 | 1.7 | |
| Leafy vegetables | 19.8 | 55.9 | 13.2 | 11.0 | 1.7 |
| Fruits | 24.0 | 41.3 | 11.4 | 23.3 | 2.3 |
Household asset quintile and mean days (and 95% confidence interval) of eating fish/meat and egg/milk by unmarried adolescent girls in the last seven days
| Household asset quintile | Mean days of consumption | No. of adolescent girls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fish/meat Mean (95% CI) | Egg/milk Mean (95% CI) | ||
| Overall | 4.7 (4.7–4.8) | 3.3 (3.2–3.4) | 4,993 |
| Lowest | 3.8 (3.7–4.0) | 2.2 (2.0–2.3) | 1,003 |
| Second | 4.1 (4.0–4.3) | 2.9 (2.7–3.1) | 1,011 |
| Middle | 4.6 (4.5–4.8) | 3.5 (3.3–3.7) | 999 |
| Fourth | 5.2 (5.1–5.3) | 3.8 (3.6–4.0) | 994 |
| Highest | 5.9 (5.8–6.0) | 4.2 (4.0–4.4) | 986 |
| Highest:lowest ratio | 1.55 | 1.91 | |
CI=Confidence interval
Percentage and odds ratio of knowing the importance of taking extra nutrients and taking iron supplements during adolescence for different characteristics
| Characteristics | Unaware of extra nutrients | Intake of iron supplements | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude % | Adjusted OR | Crude % | Adjusted OR | |
| Age (years) | ||||
| 13–14 | 55.3 | 1.00 | 8.6 | 1.00 |
| 15–16 | 68.2 | 1.41 | 13.7 | 1.55 |
| 17–18 | 77.9 | 2.13 | 19.1 | 2.14 |
| Knew need of extra nutrients | ||||
| No | Not applicable | 9.3 | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 14.7 | 2.43 | ||
| Exposure to mass media | ||||
| Low | 52.7 | 1.00 | 6.3 | 1.00 |
| High | 72.4 | 1.63 | 15.9 | 1.24 |
| Education level | ||||
| Up to grade V | 44.8 | 1.00 | 8.6 | 1.00 |
| Grade VI or above | 73.3 | 2.13 | 14.3 | 1.36 |
| Household asset quintile | ||||
| Lowest | 47.5 | 1.00 | 9.4 | 1.00 |
| Second lowest | 60.0 | 1.21 (0.99–1.48) | 10.7 | 0.92 (0.66–1.30) |
| Middle | 64.4 | 1.35 | 13.3 | 1.12 (0.80–1.56) |
| Fourth | 69.5 | 1.45 | 14.3 | 1.13 (0.79–1.61) |
| Highest | 80.5 | 2.01 | 14.6 | 0.83 (0.58–1.19) |
| Survey upazila | ||||
| NNP | 62.5 | 1.00 | 8.4 | 1.00 |
| BINP | 66.6 | 1.34 | 20.6 | 3.53 |
| Comparison | 64.0 | 1.11 (0.88–1.38) | 4.6 | 0.83 (0.51–1.36) |
| All | 64.3 | 12.5 | ||
| Model χ2 (with df) | 361.6 (10), p<0.001 | 244.6 (11), p<0.001 | ||
The dependent variable equals to 1 if a girl knew the need of taking extra nutrients during adolescence, took iron supplement, 0 otherwise;
†OR was adjusted for clustering of nutrition knowledge of girls of the same clusters;
*p<0.05,
**p<0.01 (compared with reference category);
BINP=Bangladesh Integrated Nutrition Project;
CI=Confidence interval;
df=Degree of freedom;
NNP=National Nutrition Programme;
OR=Odds ratio