Literature DB >> 23551538

Managing the difficult penile prosthesis patient.

Landon W Trost1, Neil Baum, Wayne J G Hellstrom.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs) are associated with excellent long-term outcomes and patient/partner satisfaction. A small percentage of patients remain dissatisfied, despite acceptable surgical results. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate factors associated with patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction, define patient characteristics, which may identify elevated risk of postoperative dissatisfaction, and describe management strategies to optimize functional and psychological patient outcomes.
METHODS: A review of urologic and non-urologic cosmetic surgery literature was performed to identify factors associated with patient satisfaction/dissatisfaction. Emphasis was placed on articles defining "high risk" or psychologically challenging patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative factors associated with patient satisfaction/dissatisfaction and character traits, which may identify elevated risk of postoperative dissatisfaction or otherwise indicate a psychologically challenging patient.
RESULTS: Contemporary patient and partner satisfaction rates following IPP are 92-100% and 91-95%, respectively. Factors associated with satisfaction include decreased preoperative expectations, favorable female partner sexual function, body mass index ≤30, and absence of Peyronie's disease or prior prostatectomy. Determinants of dissatisfaction include perceived/actual loss of penile length, decreased glanular engorgement, altered erectile/ejaculatory sensation, pain, diminished cosmetic outcome, difficulty with device function, partner dissatisfaction and perception of unnatural sensation, complications, and extent of alternative treatments offered. Personality characteristics which may indicate psychologically challenging IPP patients include obsessive/compulsive tendencies, unrealistic expectations, patients undergoing revision surgery, those seeking multiple surgical opinions, feeling of entitlement, patients in denial of their prior erectile/sexual function and current disease status, or those with other psychiatric disorders. The mnemonic CURSED Patient is presented: "Compulsive/obsessive, Unrealistic, Revision, Surgeon Shopping, Entitled, Denial, and Psychiatric."
CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of IPP patients experience excellent, durable satisfaction and outcomes, a challenging subset of patients may be at increased risk of postoperative dissatisfaction. Appropriate recognition/prevention and management of this cohort may help to establish and strengthen relationships, reduce physical, emotional, and legal risk, and ultimately enhance patient satisfaction.
© 2013 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23551538     DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  28 in total

Review 1.  A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Philip Wanzek; George Bailey
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  [Current therapeutic options for Peyronie's disease].

Authors:  A Hauptmann; T Diemer; W Weidner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Intraoperative Intracavernosal Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel) Injection Does Not Affect Systemic Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Hisanori Taniguchi; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 4.  Strategies for penile prosthesis placement in Peyronie's disease and corporal fibrosis.

Authors:  Faysal A Yafi; Premsant Sangkum; Ian Ross McCaslin; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Manufacturers' data show increasing implanted cylinder sizes and measured corporal lengths in inflatable penile implants.

Authors:  Charles Welliver; Michael Kottwitz; Ardalan E Ahmad; Steven K Wilson; Tobias S Köhler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Satisfaction assessment with malleable prosthetic implant of Spectra (AMS) and Genesis (Coloplast) models.

Authors:  A R Casabé; N Sarotto; C Gutierrez; A J Bechara
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.896

7.  Comparison of patient satisfaction rates for the malleable and two piece-inflatable penile prostheses.

Authors:  Hakan Kılıçarslan; Yurdaer Kaynak; Kaan Gökcen; Burhan Coşkun; Onur Kaygısız
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-12

Review 8.  [The "right" patient for implant surgery in urology : Why patient selection, informed consent, and communication are so important for patient satisfaction].

Authors:  C Leiber; A Katzenwadel; D Schlager
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Faysal A Yafi; Lawrence Jenkins; Maarten Albersen; Giovanni Corona; Andrea M Isidori; Shari Goldfarb; Mario Maggi; Christian J Nelson; Sharon Parish; Andrea Salonia; Ronny Tan; John P Mulhall; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 52.329

10.  Shortened penis post penile prosthesis implantation treated with subcutaneous soft silicone penile implant: case report.

Authors:  V Shirvanian; G Lemperle; C Araujo Pinto; J J Elist
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.